For what it's worth, I agree with the Mill explanation of the source of
energy being the angular momentum of electrons, either orbital or intrinsic
or both.
Bob Cook
PS: that’s spin energy.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:09 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Electron-mediated alpha decay in quasi-stable isotopes
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
You seem to be conflating Holmlid with CQM, Robin.
Actually I was conflating it with IRH. Regardless, if one wants to get
energy from somewhere, then an explanation of the source of that energy
needs to be found.
If 50 eV UV is released from the "ash", then 50 eV must have gone into it's
creation.
Robin,
There are any number of way this can happen, including a dynamical Casimir
effect (after all, we are dealing with geometries which are clearly within
the Casimir range) ... but the most provocative possibility comes from a
"hybrid" viewpoint.
Mills suggests that about 54.4 eV can be derived from the loss of angular
momentum of electron at the second level of redundancy. Perhaps Holmlid has
shown us (by improving on Mills theory) that when this level is reached,
the UV energy becomes internalized much of the time, no radiation occurs,
and the species shrinks all the way to "ultradense" with no further emission
of any kind.
... which kinda negates the prior conclusion that "both cannot be correct."
Maybe Holmlid and Mills are both partly correct in a way which goes a long
way towards explaining everything in LENR.
