Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[H LV]

Oh F***. I don't give a Sh*T one way or the other.

Harry



On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Steve High  wrote:

> Why presume that the Court suspects IH as being the party who has
> committed economic crime?
>
> On Monday, June 6, 2016, H LV  wrote:
>
>> ​from
>>
>>
>> https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/good-prospects-for-rossi-and-leonardo-corp-lawsuit/
>> ​
>>
>> ​<<​
>> The reassignment of the lawsuit to the District Court Judge Cecilia
>> Altonaga and the consulting of the economic crime specialist Magistrate
>> John O’Sullivan, indicates that the court already has an initial suspicion
>> towards economic crime and therefore the lawsuit will not be rejected on
>> the basis of technicalities.
>> ​>>​
>>
>> ​Harry​
>>
>>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[Ruby]

If we consider the many autonomous robots that tweet, post, comment, and 
reply for you, it may be!



On 6/6/16 8:44 AM, Bob Higgins wrote:
I have heard that many of the anonymous (avatar) supporters of Rossi's 
case on LENR forum and other blogs are Rossi himself - posting under 
various names.


On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Ruby  wrote:


There is no reasoning with a digital meme.  Elon Musk said it out
loud - we may be living in a simulation, for AI is all around us.

Reason does not exist there.

A true advocate of new energy will always list the many players in
this field making a new energy future happen.
Here is what I wrote after the Oct 2011 test.  I wish more
bloggers would do the same.
http://coldfusionnow.org/steam-punk/

Ruby

On 6/6/16 7:25 AM, Eric Walker wrote:

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jack Cole wrote:

I think the article is representative of the mindset of a lot of
people who have been drawn in as LENR observers, however, and in
that regard it has interest. People who have certain
preconceptions, and then make inferences far beyond the evidence
to fit with those preconceptions, oblivious,
Eric


-- 
Ruby Carat

Eureka, CA USA

r...@coldfusionnow.org
www.coldfusionnow.org
lenrexplained.com





--
Ruby Carat
Eureka, CA USA
1-707-616-4894
r...@coldfusionnow.org 
www.coldfusionnow.org 
lenrexplained.com 

Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[Ruby]

There is no reasoning with a digital meme.  Elon Musk said it out loud - 
we may be living in a simulation, for AI is all around us.


It just doesn't look like what we thought it would.

All the records, pictures, data, comments, tweets, .pdfs, videos, etc of 
Rossi (-and everyone!) LIVES an autonomous digital life - 24-7 alive - 
with no physical body at all.


Reason is from another realm, the physical realm, where you say 
something, I listen, and then respond to your points, and we exchange 
little by little, point-by-point in a linear fashion that our chain of 
logic can handle.


What we have now is all-at-once viral impressions, perceptions seemingly 
amplified by the speed-of-light networks to be everywhere at all times.


Reason does not exist there.

I used to blog on these issues, too.  A true advocate of new energy will 
always list the many players in this field making a new energy future 
happen.  Rossi is but one of the players.  Let's place all the 
researchers in the spotlight, and generate awareness of a very real 
(physical) newly-forming service environment (the ground) from which 
will emerge a usable technology (the figure).


Here is what I wrote after the Oct 2011 test.  I wish more bloggers 
would do the same.

http://coldfusionnow.org/steam-punk/

Now, this legal saga will waste more mental space than my noggin will 
fit.  I'll wait for the "ending"!

Dammit, I hope it's good.
Ruby

On 6/6/16 7:25 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jack Cole > wrote:


I think the article is representative of the mindset of a lot of 
people who have been drawn in as LENR observers, however, and in that 
regard it has interest. People who have certain preconceptions, and 
then make inferences far beyond the evidence to fit with those 
preconceptions, oblivious,

Eric


--
Ruby Carat
Eureka, CA USA

r...@coldfusionnow.org
www.coldfusionnow.org
lenrexplained.com

Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[Bob Higgins]

I have heard that many of the anonymous (avatar) supporters of Rossi's case
on LENR forum and other blogs are Rossi himself - posting under various
names.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Ruby  wrote:

>
> There is no reasoning with a digital meme.  Elon Musk said it out loud -
> we may be living in a simulation, for AI is all around us.
>
> It just doesn't look like what we thought it would.
>
> All the records, pictures, data, comments, tweets, .pdfs, videos, etc of
> Rossi (-and everyone!) LIVES an autonomous digital life - 24-7 alive - with
> no physical body at all.
>
> Reason is from another realm, the physical realm, where you say something,
> I listen, and then respond to your points, and we exchange little by
> little, point-by-point in a linear fashion that our chain of logic can
> handle.
>
> What we have now is all-at-once viral impressions, perceptions seemingly
> amplified by the speed-of-light networks to be everywhere at all times.
>
> Reason does not exist there.
>
> I used to blog on these issues, too.  A true advocate of new energy will
> always list the many players in this field making a new energy future
> happen.  Rossi is but one of the players.  Let's place all the researchers
> in the spotlight, and generate awareness of a very real (physical)
> newly-forming service environment (the ground) from which will emerge a
> usable technology (the figure).
>
> Here is what I wrote after the Oct 2011 test.  I wish more bloggers would
> do the same.
> http://coldfusionnow.org/steam-punk/
>
> Now, this legal saga will waste more mental space than my noggin will
> fit.  I'll wait for the "ending"!
> Dammit, I hope it's good.
> Ruby
>
> On 6/6/16 7:25 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jack Cole  wrote:
>
> I think the article is representative of the mindset of a lot of people
> who have been drawn in as LENR observers, however, and in that regard it
> has interest.  People who have certain preconceptions, and then make
> inferences far beyond the evidence to fit with those preconceptions,
> oblivious,
> Eric
>
>
> --
> Ruby Carat
> Eureka, CA USA
>
> r...@coldfusionnow.org
> www.coldfusionnow.org
> lenrexplained.com
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[Eric Walker]

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jack Cole  wrote:

Steve High wrote: "Why presume that the Court suspects IH as being the
> party who has committed economic crime?"
>
> Yes, that is a painfully presumptive article written as if the
> presumptions are facts.  It is by an anonymous blogger.  It's not worth
> reading unless you enjoy reading propaganda.
>

I think the article is representative of the mindset of a lot of people who
have been drawn in as LENR observers, however, and in that regard it has
interest.  People who have certain preconceptions, and then make inferences
far beyond the evidence to fit with those preconceptions, oblivious, as
this author was, to the possibility that (1) there may be no connection
between the motion to dismiss and the reassignment (and there probably
isn't, due to the slow pace at which lawsuits proceed); and (2) the
reassignment may have more to do with Rossi than IH.

It is difficult to reason with people in this kind of mindset, but there
are many of them, especially on LENR Forum.

Eric

Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[Jack Cole]

Steve High wrote: "Why presume that the Court suspects IH as being the
party who has committed economic crime?"

Yes, that is a painfully presumptive article written as if the presumptions
are facts.  It is by an anonymous blogger.  It's not worth reading unless
you enjoy reading propaganda.



On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:43 AM Steve High  wrote:

> Why presume that the Court suspects IH as being the party who has
> committed economic crime?
>
> On Monday, June 6, 2016, H LV  wrote:
>
>> ​from
>>
>>
>> https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/good-prospects-for-rossi-and-leonardo-corp-lawsuit/
>> ​
>>
>> ​<<​
>> The reassignment of the lawsuit to the District Court Judge Cecilia
>> Altonaga and the consulting of the economic crime specialist Magistrate
>> John O’Sullivan, indicates that the court already has an initial suspicion
>> towards economic crime and therefore the lawsuit will not be rejected on
>> the basis of technicalities.
>> ​>>​
>>
>> ​Harry​
>>
>>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[Steve High]

Why presume that the Court suspects IH as being the party who has committed
economic crime?

On Monday, June 6, 2016, H LV  wrote:

> ​from
>
>
> https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/good-prospects-for-rossi-and-leonardo-corp-lawsuit/
> ​
>
> ​<<​
> The reassignment of the lawsuit to the District Court Judge Cecilia
> Altonaga and the consulting of the economic crime specialist Magistrate
> John O’Sullivan, indicates that the court already has an initial suspicion
> towards economic crime and therefore the lawsuit will not be rejected on
> the basis of technicalities.
> ​>>​
>
> ​Harry​
>
>

[Vo]:Rossi and Leonardo Corp legal position improves

[H LV]

​from

https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/good-prospects-for-rossi-and-leonardo-corp-lawsuit/
​

​<<​
The reassignment of the lawsuit to the District Court Judge Cecilia
Altonaga and the consulting of the economic crime specialist Magistrate
John O’Sullivan, indicates that the court already has an initial suspicion
towards economic crime and therefore the lawsuit will not be rejected on
the basis of technicalities.
​>>​

​Harry​