From Rick:
Was not a stray rocket test. It was a test of a powerful torsion
weapon. Or so says Hoagland:
From Terry:
Was not a stray rocket test. It was a test of a powerful torsion
weapon. Or so says Hoagland:
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Norway-Message.htm
By now, this fascinating stellar event has been widely viewed across the
entire planet.
R. Hoagland represents many things to many people.
My personal epiphany with Hoagland occurred many years ago when I got a
chance to personally view a duplicate of 120mm negative that Hoagland
analyzed. The original negative was taken by Apollo astronauts as they
circled the moon. I believe it was the Apollo 14 mission. Hoagland spent a
great deal of time analyzing what he interpreted to be a strange anomaly
that seemed to be on the surface of Mare Crisium. Richard seemed convinced
Mare Crisium contained an artificially constructed tower... a HUGE tower.
When I viewed a copy of this negative, I had to admit that at first glance
it did look like a massive tower. The tower was so huge that it would have
been impossible for the Apollo astronauts NOT to have spotted or to have
commented on it many times as they orbited above Mare Crisium. Of course,
the fact that the astronauts apparently DIDN'T comment on what they saw
within Mare Crisium only added more fuel to exciting conspiracy theories.
Obviously, the astronauts must have been sworn to secrecy. Whatever...
Meanwhile, within seconds after I viewed the negative I noticed that there
appeared to be several other strange artifacts nearby. These other artifacts
also looked like they could be towers. What was even more interesting was
the fact that all these other artifacts where aligned in an exact same
parallel angle with the original tower. But these other towers were
located on other spots on the moon where the visual 3-D perspective as well
as the natural curvature of the surface of the moon would have changed their
parallel alignment as perceived by the camera. These other tower
artifacts, to have been actually towers should NOT be in an exact parallel
angle with the original tower. And then it hit me like a ton of bricks.
The original tower was nothing more than a simple scratch in the emulsion
of the film. Someone got careless when they were handling the original
negative and they ended up inducing several parallel scratches upon the
surface in several locations. Those scratches was then faithfully duplicated
in all the rest of the negatives.
I was astonished that Mr. Hoagland, with all of his presumed analytic
abilities, appeared to have been incapable of diagnosing a simple emulsion
scratch on the surface of a negative. That pretty much told me everything I
needed to know about how far I should take any of Hoagland's speculative
theories.
Despite what I personally concluded was Hoagland's inexcusable
misinterpretation I must confess that Mare Crisium ITSELF remains a
fascinating mystery. For the curious please take a look at some of the
following images of the Mare. Of particular interest are the first three
photos in the top row. The shape of Mare Crisium is unmistakably hexagonal.
Is this hexagonal shape just a coincidence? A mere artifact of shadow and
other natural events that somehow conspired to make such an interesting
shape? Some have speculated that perhaps there was some artificial
work-at-hand. If so, some speculation suggests that such work-at-hand most
likely occurred billions of years ago when our Moon was much younger, while
life on our Earth was probably no more advanced than single cell protozoa.
Could there have been an observational post on Crisium? Was it possible that
someone was watching us, wondering what might eventually come out of that
gooey soup some day Who knows. ;-)
Enjoy the show!
http://images.google.com/images?source=ighl=enrlz=q=mare+crisiumum=1ie=
UTF-8ei=yv07S-XGEobmM6WyzYwJsa=Xoi=image_result_groupct=titleresnum=4v
ed=0CB4QsAQwAw
http://tinyurl.com/ybh6cqy
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
