[Vo]:Volts to vapor

[thomas malloy]

Jones Beene posted;

Does the following (controversial) information change things?:

http://waterfuel.t35.com/water_explosion.html 
http://webmail.usfamily.net/web/services/go.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwaterfuel.t35.com%2Fwater_explosion.html


Note: George Hathaway, who posts here on occasion, and is mentioned in 
the site above, has apparently recanted most of that information.


It would seem to me that if it were that simple to produce energy, 
someone would have taken Puthoff's 1 watt challenge.


Yesterday I saw a Brown's Gas generator. Has anyone seen anybody hook 
one into an automobile?



--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---

[Vo]:Volts to Vapor ?

[Jones Beene]

Here is a question which seems to be a no-brainer at first glance.

Lets say you have a battery pack capable of giving a light automobile a 40 mile 
range, like the Chevy Volt - using an electric 100+ kW electric motor.

Poser: is there any conceivable advantage in NOT using the electric motor as 
the source of power? - i.e. - instead of the electric motor, convert a small 
piston engine of same 100+ kW power - but which has been converted to use 
injected water as the fuel, and the electric power is used to produce arcing 
which explodes the water, turning the engine. 

I predict that upwards to 99% of vorticians will say: No way Jose', this is a 
foolish waste, because the electric motor is probably 90% efficient and the 
piston engine is going to have much more frictional losses, etc. so why bother?


Does the following (controversial) information change things?:

http://waterfuel.t35.com/water_explosion.html

Note: George Hathaway, who posts here on occasion, and is mentioned in the site 
above, has apparently recanted most of that information. 

Is that the final word on this possibility, and/or -- is it worth an effort to 
prototype it to find out, given that the cost to do so is probably not 
excessive ?

Jones