Re: [Vo]:What if radiation doesn't cause cancer?

2007-07-22 Thread Terry Blanton

On 7/21/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I take it that Repro Man refers to a movie? Having that image of the car
sure makes it difficult to read.


One of the best:

http://imdb.com/title/tt0087995/

more of BB's quote:

J. Frank Parnell: Ever been to Utah? Ra-di-a-tion. Yes, indeed. You
hear the most outrageous lies about it. Half-baked goggle-box
do-gooders telling everybody it's bad for you. Pernicious nonsense.
Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year. They ought to
have them, too. When they canceled the project it almost did me in.
One day my mind was full to bursting. The next day - nothing. Swept
away. But I'll show them. I had a lobotomy in the end.

Otto: Lobotomy? Isn't that for loonies?

Parnell: Not at all. Friend of mine had one. Designer of the neutron
bomb. You ever hear of the neutron bomb? Destroys people - leaves
buildings standing. Fits in a suitcase. It's so small, no one knows
it's there until - BLAMMO. Eyes melt, skin explodes, everybody dead.
So immoral, working on the thing can drive you mad. That's what
happened to this friend of mine. So he had a lobotomy. Now he's well
again.



Re: [Vo]:What if radiation doesn't cause cancer?

2007-07-21 Thread thomas malloy

William Beaty wrote:


Maybe J. Frank Parnell was right after all.


 Risk of Radiation-Induced Cancer Increased in Some Individuals

radiation disease?  Irradiate everyone with low power x-rays, but only
certain families aren't immune?
 



I take it that the study proves that certain families are more resistant 
to radiation than others? Macro evolution is a marvelous thing. Twenty 
years ago at a Global Sciences conference, I met a man who used to work 
in a nuclear facility. He contended that radiation was good for you. I 
wonder if he is still alive.




J. Frank Parnell (from "Repo Man")
http://www.myspace.com/jfrankparnell

 

I take it that Repro Man refers to a movie? Having that image of the car 
sure makes it difficult to read.



--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---



[Vo]:What if radiation doesn't cause cancer?

2007-07-21 Thread William Beaty

Maybe J. Frank Parnell was right after all.

Conventional theory says that radiation-induced cancer occurs with a
certain probability based on accumulated molecular damage.  But why didn't
evolution provide a fix for this long ago?  What if it did, and this
cumulative damage doesn't occur except in certain people who suffer a
genetic disorder which breaks a corrective process?

  Risk of Radiation-Induced Cancer Increased in Some Individuals
  http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/555669
  http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1667%2FRR3329

Apparently the benign menengiomas (brain cancer) caused by theraputic
x-ray treatment widely given in the 1950s was concentrated in certain
groups of people.  A-bomb a city, but only certain people come down with
radiation disease?  Irradiate everyone with low power x-rays, but only
certain families aren't immune?


J. Frank Parnell (from "Repo Man")
http://www.myspace.com/jfrankparnell

 "Ra-di-ation, yes indeed!
  You hear the most outrageous lies about it.
  Half-baked, goggle-boxed do-gooders telling everybody it's bad for you.
  Pernicious nonsense! Everybody could stand a hundred chest x-rays a
  year.  They oughtta have 'em, too."


(( ( (  (   ((O))   )  ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  425-222-5066unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci