Hi Robin
First here a free of hijacking from Academia.edu version::
https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/APS/fc77d112-850f-4db6-997c-e434bd4670b5/UploadedImages/Documents/Meeting_Presentations/H14-3.pdf
This, your reference, is a summary paper of 2009 from an APS meeting...
But, first some basics: A few days ago I uploaded a short paper about
the nature of fields that factually can never be 1/r .
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367405461_Basics_of_fields
Proof by strict 3D multivariable integrals. (this to my knowledge is am
novelty) So this explains why all classic models fail as the 1/r law
only works for point fields, the same holds for the Gauss flux law. So
all classic model GR,QM,QED, LQCD) are fundamentally damaged by this
finding , as all particles = field sources cannot be points due to a
magnetic moment.
Now the summary. 5D models could have been an intermediate step to the
correct solution as in fact dense matter does a full 4D mass like
rotation but not sphere like. (Charges adds a fifth rotation).
Physicist got stock in childhood ideas of points, marbles (balls) and
simple fields... A sphere simply can never be the solution of a physical
problem because the only symmetry is a point, what does not allow for a
force balance. For the same reason circle orbits for planets cannot work
long time stable. A full point symmetry leads to a fully static solution
and does not allow a perturbation. (Funny physics exercise was a
radially oscillating pudding...)
Other blunders are 3D tensor fields of which no sources are known or 3
full matter rotations (Einsteins GR)...Here the error is tricky to
explain. (its in an other paper)
Generally time plays no role for the fields of dense mass because in a
closed orbit time is locked in = is a period. So these folks never
started to think about the real basics. Thus to mix a time based model
GR with e.g. atomic QM, that is in fact timeless (time is a local
period) for its static part, is a certain kind of madness I cannot explain.
Classic physics simply is a graveyard. I myself was shocked by the "non
1/r" finding as it was the last I wanted to understand but for other
reasons...
I usually tell people that in 50 years standard model papers will be
used as party gags to enjoy the folks with outraging garbage...
J.W.
On 29.01.2023 21:21, Robin wrote:
Hi Jürg,
What do you think of this paper?:-
https://www.academia.edu/32985587/Unification_Accomplished_Einsteins_dream_realized_in_the_Single_Field_Theory?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper
Cloud storage:-
Unsafe, Slow, Expensive
...pick any three.
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
