Re: OT: the political economy of energy distribution

2006-05-18 Thread John Steck



Yikes!  Even with grand illustrations of failure why is it not 
recognized that the prime survival instinct in every living thing runs contrary 
to communistic ideology?  The romance of homogenous equality goes right out 
the window as soon as the have-nots become haves.  Isn't "Animal Farm" on 
the required reading list in schools anymore?  For the latest 
example look no further than Zimbabwe and their accelerating 1000%+ 
inflation from Mugabe's Orwellian-style redistribution of land 
resources.
 
Tuesday, January 1, 2002 ...1 US Dollar = 57.34300 Zimbabwe Dollar
Wednesday, January 1, 2003 ... 1 US 
Dollar = 57.14500 Zimbabwe Dollar


  
  

  Thursday, January 1, 2004 ... 1 US Dollar = 818.520 Zimbabwe Dollar 
  
Saturday, January 1, 2005 ... 1 US Dollar = 5,600.10 Zimbabwe 
Dollar
Sunday, January 1, 2006 
... 1 US Dollar = 82,902.0 Zimbabwe Dollar
Thursday, May 18, 2006 ... 1 US Dollar = 101,874 Zimbabwe Dollar 

 
Perhaps just a cynical viewpoint, but 
humanity organized  >>anything<<  is the few looking to 
control the many for the benefit of the self appointed elite; religion, 
politics, sex, work, play, etc.
 
-john
 
 
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:42 
PMTo: vortex-l@eskimo.comCc: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: OT: the political economy of 
energy distribution


In a message dated 5/11/2006 4:51:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the 24th century there is no need for money in Gene 
  Roddenberry'sworld of Star Trek.Gene Roddenberry never really 
  explained how such a society could functionwithout money, but a possible 
  system was outlined decades before Star Trekfirst appeared on 
  television...http://www.technocracy.org/?p=/documents/pamphlets/energy-distributionHarry
Thanks for the above link. 
 
Best Regards, 
 Baron Volsung, www.rhfweb.com/baronPresident Thomas 
D. Clark, Email form: http://www.rhfweb.com/emailform.html, 
Personal Web Page: http://www.rhfweb.com/personal.htmlArchitectural 
Engineers, http://www.rhfweb.com/aeStar Haven 
Community Services, at http://www.rhfweb.com/shRadiation Health 
Foundation Trust at http://www.rhfweb.com/Baron Volsung, www.rhfweb.com/baronMaking 
a difference one person at a timeGet informed. Inform 
others


Re: OT: the political economy of energy distribution

2006-05-18 Thread ThomasClark123




In a message dated 5/11/2006 4:51:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the 24th century there is no need for money in Gene Roddenberry'sworld of Star Trek.Gene Roddenberry never really explained how such a society could functionwithout money, but a possible system was outlined decades before Star Trekfirst appeared on television...http://www.technocracy.org/?p=/documents/pamphlets/energy-distributionHarry
Thanks for the above link. 
 
Best Regards,  Baron Volsung, www.rhfweb.com/baronPresident Thomas D. Clark, Email form: http://www.rhfweb.com/emailform.html, Personal Web Page: http://www.rhfweb.com/personal.htmlArchitectural Engineers, http://www.rhfweb.com/aeStar Haven Community Services, at http://www.rhfweb.com/shRadiation Health Foundation Trust at http://www.rhfweb.com/Baron Volsung, www.rhfweb.com/baronMaking a difference one person at a timeGet informed. Inform others


OT: the political economy of energy distribution

2006-05-11 Thread Harry Veeder

In the 24th century there is no need for money in Gene Roddenberry's
world of Star Trek.

Gene Roddenberry never really explained how such a society could function
without money, but a possible system was outlined decades before Star Trek
first appeared on television...

http://www.technocracy.org/?p=/documents/pamphlets/energy-distribution

Harry