RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter and explains the EM drive

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Bob Higgins—

What do you think about Mikes theory of quantized inertia (QI)? And what about 
his use of QI to explain galactic mechanics without dark matter?  Does the 
emdrive mistake void the concept of QI?

(The Ted talk has been deleted from youtube apparently.

Bob Cook

From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 5:36 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter and 
explains the EM drive

I have read McCulloch's book.  His proposition fails in causality.  Filters do 
not form with a filled state, they have a finite impulse response that he 
hadn't addressed when I asked him about it.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:25 AM, Russ 
mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Here’s Mike McCulloch’s TedX talk last Thursday. It is remarkable work.  
https://youtu.be/ZsGZsgd-944

Mike is what one might call as ‘armchair physics anti-matter’ as he annihilates 
the fiction of dark matter with straight forward math and real data, 
eliminating the dark matter fudge that has made a sticky mess of science for a 
long time.

Re: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter and explains the EM drive

[Bob Higgins]

I have read McCulloch's book.  His proposition fails in causality.  Filters
do not form with a filled state, they have a finite impulse response that
he hadn't addressed when I asked him about it.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:25 AM, Russ  wrote:

> Here’s Mike McCulloch’s TedX talk last Thursday. It is remarkable work.
> https://youtu.be/ZsGZsgd-944
>
>
>
> Mike is what one might call as ‘armchair physics anti-matter’ as he
> annihilates the fiction of dark matter with straight forward math and real
> data, eliminating the dark matter fudge that has made a sticky mess of
> science for a long time.
>