Re:[Vo]:Expanding on De Broglies treatment of the Hydrogen atom

2008-08-19 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
Jones wrote:

Robin -oops ... looks like I left out a not as in
not have but anyway, on another reading, let me
retract previous message and start over with a
hopefully new and improved version.

Ok, I'll reply when you post it.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re:[Vo]:Expanding on De Broglies treatment of the Hydrogen atom

2008-08-19 Thread Jones Beene
Robin, 

I will return to that tomorrow hopefully - got
distracted with a minor success today ... however, I
would be interested in hearing exactly what you see as
the ultimate source (of putative excess energy)? 

If I am not mistaken, you thought it to be nuclear
mass- at one time, but that causes all sorts of
problems the deeper one looks into it (i.e. the
specifics of how and why).

Jones


--- Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Jones wrote:
 
 Robin -oops ... looks like I left out a not as in
 not have but anyway, on another reading, let me
 retract previous message and start over with a
 hopefully new and improved version.
 
 Ok, I'll reply when you post it.
 Regards,
 
 Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



Re: [Vo]:Expanding on De Broglies treatment of the Hydrogen atom

2008-08-18 Thread Jones Beene
Robin -oops ... looks like I left out a not as in
not have but anyway, on another reading, let me
retract previous message and start over with a
hopefully new and improved version.