Re: [vox-tech] Audio Card Recomendation
Any PCI card with the es1370, es1371 chipset would be up your alley. Cheap, good quality, easy to work with. I doubt it has two inputs, but the Creative PCI-128 is cheap, good and easy. Pete On Fri 17 Nov 06, 4:50 PM, Alex Mandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm planning out my 1st experiment for school. The plan is to record audio to a hard drive, hopefully in FLAC format using a http://www.soekris.com/net4801.htm Anyone have recommendations for an easy to work with quality PCI audio card, two inputs would be optimal so I can have one mic for human audible sound and one for ultrasound (Can you alter the drivers to make some of the outs inputs?). But be resonable on price and power consumption. I'm going to building a custom linux (linux from scratch or maybe just use Debian) so I'll take module and software recommendations too on how to pull this off. An alternate plan is to use Mini-PCI type III although I imagine it'll cost me more in the end. And no, this isn't actually my research question it's just a tool I need to get there. Thanks, Alex PS: On a note from the last social - there is a lab on campus building remote controlled aircraft to take remote sending imagery with a real time feed to a google earth map overlay. ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech -- How VBA rounds a number depends on the number's internal representation. You cannot always predict how it will round when the rounding digit is 5. If you want a rounding function that rounds according to predictable rules, you should write your own. -- MSDN, on Microsoft VBA's stochastic rounding function Peter Jay Salzman, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.dirac.org/p PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] Setting the font in gvim (Vim with GUI)
På 2006-11-16, skrev Ken Bloom:
[...]
Escape the spaces with a backslash:
My .gvimrc contains:
if has(gui_gtk2)
set guifont=Monospace\ 8
else
set guifont=-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-*-120-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1
endif
function Kprinter()
call system('kprinter ' . v:fname_in)
call delete(v:fname_in)
return v:shell_error
endfunc
The Kprinter function is kinda cool. I run :set printexpr=Kprinter()
and then when I use the :hardcopy (:ha) command, I get a proper print
dialog box.
Thanks Ken, this works perfectly!
For :hardcopy, I'm using the following:
set printexpr=PrintFile(v:fname_in)
function PrintFile(fname)
call system(gv . a:fname)
call delete(a:fname)
return v:shell_error
endfunc
set printoptions=paper:letter
which gives me a preview in Ghostview before printing anything.
--
Henry House
+1 530 753 3361 ext. 13
Please don't send me HTML mail! My mail system frequently rejects it.
The unintelligible text that may follow is a digital signature.
See http://hajhouse.org/pgp to find out how to use it.
My OpenPGP key: http://hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] apache2: NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost
I'm trying to understand NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost. Suppose I have a server with hostname satan, IP address 192.168.0.2 that serves two sites: www.dirac.org with DocumentRoot /www/ www.foo.orgwith DocumentRoot /www/foo And I have the following entry in /etc/hosts: 192.168.0.2 satan.diablo.localnet satan dirac.org www.dirac.org The sites-enabled files look like: # /etc/apache2/sites-available/dirac.org VirtualHost dirac.org DocumentRoot /www ServerName www.dirac.org ServerAlias dirac.org *.dirac.org ... /VirtualHost # /etc/apache2/sites-available/foo.org (doesn't work) VirtualHost foo.org DocumentRoot /www/foo ServerName www.dirac.org ServerAlias dirac.org *.dirac.org foo.org *.foo.org ... /VirtualHost Why is the NameVirtualHost directive necessary and how do I use it? Thanks! Peter ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] apache2: NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 12:31:59AM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: VirtualHost dirac.org DocumentRoot /www ServerName www.dirac.org ServerAlias dirac.org *.dirac.org ... /VirtualHost # /etc/apache2/sites-available/foo.org (doesn't work) VirtualHost foo.org DocumentRoot /www/foo ServerName www.dirac.org ServerAlias dirac.org *.dirac.org foo.org *.foo.org ... /VirtualHost Won't your server alias lines confuse things? You might know this already, you can telnet to port 80 and issue http/1.1 directives as follows to better test and isolate behavior: telnet localhost 80 GET / HTTP/1.0 enter This should confirm what the base site is. I typically, with apache 1.3, have to configure a base site, and then add virtualhost directives for the other sites I want. Any time I only have virtual sites, I have odd behaviors (kind of like what you've mentioned). Here's an 1.1 request telnet localhost 80 GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: dirac.org enter repeat that Host: with the different variations of your hosts until you find a pattern... once you see what Apache's doing you should be able to start tweaking the config and measuring the results. -- Ted Deppner http://www.deppner.us/ ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] apache2: NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 22:05 -0800, Micah Cowan wrote: On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 00:31 -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: Why is the NameVirtualHost directive necessary and how do I use it? ... I imagine one might want to add *:443 for virtual hosts on the https ports. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html Actually, at the start of that page, you may notice: Name-based virtual hosting cannot be used with SSL secure servers because of the nature of the SSL protocol. However: 1. It goes on to say a couple paragraphs later that if you plan to use named virtual hosts with SSL, you should add the port to the NamedVirtualHost directive (as I mentioned). 2. That phrase appears in the when to use IP vs. Named virtual hosts. Because of this, I think what is meant by the phrase is not that you /can't/ use it with SSL, but that doing so gives up the server authentication part of the security that SSL offers, leaving just the encryption benefits. -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer... http://micah.cowan.name/ ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
