[vpp-dev] VPP 2106 Linux-cp plugin supports ipv6 handling ?
Hi, We are on vpp2106 , We are using linux-cp plugin. Does it support Ipv6 traffic as well ? I can see Ipv4 traffic is going to tap interface created using below command but Ipv6 traffic is still handled by VPP plugin nodes lcp create | host-if netns [tun] Thank, Chetan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20044): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20044 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85245480/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Blocking API call #ACL #binapi
Ravi, > We want to use API calls to create the ACL and ABF policies. We need a > blocking calls because we need to decide next action on the return values. > When I checked using the VAPI, I see only Asynchronous calls and we need to > register callback for return values but I need a blocking calls > For example If I want use Show version with blocking call and return values > how can I achieve. > Is there a way to use Blocking API calls and get return values. > If any example to use Blocking API calls that will be great.. thanks. https://docs.fd.io/vpp/21.06/d4/d09/vapi_doc.html https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/src/vpp-api/vapi/vapi_c_test.c#n424 Best regards, Ole signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20045): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20045 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85224886/21656 Mute #binapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/binapi Mute #acl:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 2106 Linux-cp plugin supports ipv6 handling ?
Hoi, Yes, VPP's 21.06 plugin supports IPv4, IPv6, ARP and Neighbor Discovery to the host through the TAP. groet, Pim On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 9:06 AM chetan bhasin wrote: > Hi, > > We are on vpp2106 , We are using linux-cp plugin. Does it support Ipv6 > traffic as well ? > I can see Ipv4 traffic is going to tap interface created using below > command but Ipv6 traffic is still handled by VPP plugin nodes > lcp create | host-if netns > [tun] > > Thank, > Chetan > > > > -- Pim van Pelt PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20046): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20046 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85245480/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io Maintenance: 2021-08-31 15:00 UTC to 1900 UTC
Maintenance reminder Jenkins will be placed in shutdown mode at 14:00 UTC On 8/27/21 12:55 PM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: > > *What:* > > In preparation for Jenkins and Ingress to migrate to the new data > center The Linux Foundation will be migrating the instances from V2 to > V3 flavors. > > *When:* > > 2021-08-31 15:00 UTC to 1900 UTC > > > *Impact:* > > Due to the Ingress migration, all systems will be unavailable during > the maintenance window. > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20047): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20047 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85192020/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] VAPI ACL addition. Not getting ACL index in response. #acl #acl_plugin #vapi
Hi Experts,
We are trying to use VPP-API(VAPI) to create ACL rules.
We are using the VAPI in blocking mode to get response immediately.
We are getting the response back but the *ACL-INDEX is some other value*. Can
you please see the below code, if I am doing something wrong.
Any pointers are big help.
printf ("--- Basic acl addition- reply test ---\n");
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace *acl= vapi_alloc_acl_add_replace(ctx, 1);
if(acl==NULL)
{
printf("ACL retuns NULL %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
acl->payload.acl_index=-1;
strncpy((char *)acl->payload.tag,"CheckIsWorking",12);
acl->payload.count=1;
vapi_type_prefix src_addr,dst_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].is_permit=1;
src_addr.address.af=0;
src_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("172.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(src_addr.address.un.ip4));
dst_addr.address.af=0;
dst_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("111.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(dst_addr.address.un.ip4));
acl->payload.r[0].src_prefix=src_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].dst_prefix=dst_addr;
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_hton(acl);
rv = vapi_send (ctx, acl);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
vapi_payload_acl_add_replace_reply *resp;
size_t size;
rv = vapi_recv (ctx, (void *) &resp, &size, 0, 0);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
printf("So the reply receivied ACL Index %d Retval
%d\n",resp->acl_index,resp->retval);
vapi_msg_free (ctx, resp);
//Ravi.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20048): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20048
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85263360/21656
Mute #acl_plugin:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl_plugin
Mute #vapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vapi
Mute #acl:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] VAPI ACL addition. Not getting ACL index in response. #acl #acl_plugin #vapi
[Edited Message Follows]
Hi Experts,
We are trying to use VPP-API(VAPI) to create ACL rules.
We are using the VAPI in blocking mode to get response immediately.
We are getting the response back but the *ACL-INDEX is some other value*. Can
you please see the below code, if I am doing something wrong.
Any pointers are big help.
printf ("--- Basic acl addition- reply test ---\n");
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace *acl= vapi_alloc_acl_add_replace(ctx, 1);
if(acl==NULL)
{
printf("ACL retuns NULL %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
acl->payload.acl_index=-1;
strncpy((char *)acl->payload.tag,"CheckIsWorking",12);
acl->payload.count=1;
vapi_type_prefix src_addr,dst_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].is_permit=1;
src_addr.address.af=0;
src_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("172.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(src_addr.address.un.ip4));
dst_addr.address.af=0;
dst_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("111.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(dst_addr.address.un.ip4));
acl->payload.r[0].src_prefix=src_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].dst_prefix=dst_addr;
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_hton(acl);
rv = vapi_send (ctx, acl);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
vapi_payload_acl_add_replace_reply *resp;
size_t size;
rv = vapi_recv (ctx, (void *) &resp, &size, 0, 0);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
printf("So the reply receivied ACL Index %d Retval
%d\n",resp->acl_index,resp->retval);
vapi_msg_free (ctx, resp);
*This is our testing Output:*
# ./vapi_cli
--- Basic show version message - reply test ---
show_version_reply: program: `vpe', version: `21.06.0-2~g99c146915-dirty',
build directory: `/opt/vpp', build date: `2021-07-29T16:36:55'
--- Basic acl addition- reply test ---
So the reply receivied ACL Index 42754 Retval 0
*VPP created the ACL:
*
# vppctl show acl-plugin acl
acl-index 0 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.0.1.0/24 dst 111.0.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 1 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 2 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 3 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 4 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 5 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
I am expecting the vapi_payload_acl_add_replace_reply *resp; should contain the
acl_index but not. Can someone help.
//Ravi.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20048): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20048
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85263360/21656
Mute #vapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vapi
Mute #acl_plugin:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl_plugin
Mute #acl:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] VAPI ACL addition. Not getting ACL index in response. #acl #acl_plugin #vapi
[Edited Message Follows]
Hi Experts,
We are trying to use VPP-API(VAPI) to create ACL rules.
We are using the VAPI in blocking mode to get response immediately.
We are getting the response back but the *ACL-INDEX is some other value*. Can
you please see the below code, if I am doing something wrong.
Any pointers are big help.
printf ("--- Basic acl addition- reply test ---\n");
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace *acl= vapi_alloc_acl_add_replace(ctx, 1);
if(acl==NULL)
{
printf("ACL retuns NULL %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
acl->payload.acl_index=-1;
strncpy((char *)acl->payload.tag,"CheckIsWorking",12);
acl->payload.count=1;
vapi_type_prefix src_addr,dst_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].is_permit=1;
src_addr.address.af=0;
src_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("172.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(src_addr.address.un.ip4));
dst_addr.address.af=0;
dst_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("111.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(dst_addr.address.un.ip4));
acl->payload.r[0].src_prefix=src_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].dst_prefix=dst_addr;
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_hton(acl);
rv = vapi_send (ctx, acl);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
vapi_payload_acl_add_replace_reply *resp;
size_t size;
rv = vapi_recv (ctx, (void *) &resp, &size, 0, 0);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
printf("So the reply receivied ACL Index %d Retval
%d\n",resp->acl_index,resp->retval);
vapi_msg_free (ctx, resp);
*This is our testing Output:*
# ./vapi_cli
--- Basic show version message - reply test ---
show_version_reply: program: `vpe', version: `21.06.0-2~g99c146915-dirty',
build directory: `/opt/vpp', build date: `2021-07-29T16:36:55'
--- Basic acl addition- reply test ---
So the reply receivied *ACL Index 42754 Retval 0*
*VPP created the ACL:
*
# vppctl show acl-plugin acl
acl-index 0 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.0.1.0/24 dst 111.0.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 1 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 2 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 3 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 4 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
acl-index 5 count 1 tag {CheckIsWorki}
0: ipv4 permit src 172.1.1.0/24 dst 111.1.1.0/24 proto 0 sport 0 dport 0
I am expecting the *vapi_payload_acl_add_replace_reply *resp; should contain
the acl_index but not. Any help is truly appreciated.*
//Ravi.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20048): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20048
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85263360/21656
Mute #vapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vapi
Mute #acl_plugin:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl_plugin
Mute #acl:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VAPI ACL addition. Not getting ACL index in response. #acl #acl_plugin #vapi
Sorry for spamming, anyway, I found the problem.
I was sending wrong response structure causing the problem.
We supposed to use,
*vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_reply* *resp;
*vapi_payload_acl_add_replace_reply* *resp;
Its working fine.
Just incase some one wants to use above example, providing working one below.
printf ("--- Basic acl addition- reply test ---\n");
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace *acl= vapi_alloc_acl_add_replace(ctx, 1);
if(acl==NULL)
{
printf("ACL retuns NULL %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
acl->payload.acl_index=-1;
strncpy((char *)acl->payload.tag,"CheckIsWorking",12);
acl->payload.count=1;
vapi_type_prefix src_addr,dst_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].is_permit=1;
src_addr.address.af=0;
src_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("172.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(src_addr.address.un.ip4));
dst_addr.address.af=0;
dst_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("111.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(dst_addr.address.un.ip4));
acl->payload.r[0].src_prefix=src_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].dst_prefix=dst_addr;
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_hton(acl);
rv = vapi_send (ctx, acl);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_reply *resp;
size_t size;
rv = vapi_recv (ctx, (void *) &resp, &size, 0, 0);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_reply_ntoh(resp);
printf("So the reply receivied ACL Index %d Retval
%d\n",resp->payload.acl_index,resp->payload.retval);
vapi_msg_free (ctx, resp);
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20049): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20049
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85263360/21656
Mute #vapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vapi
Mute #acl_plugin:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl_plugin
Mute #acl:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VAPI ACL addition. Not getting ACL index in response. #acl #acl_plugin #vapi
[Edited Message Follows]
Sorry for spamming, anyway, I found the problem.
I was sending wrong response structure causing the problem.
We supposed to use,
*vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_reply* *resp; but I was using
*vapi_payload_acl_add_replace_reply* *resp;
Its working fine.
Just incase some one wants to use above example, providing working one below.
printf ("--- Basic acl addition- reply test ---\n");
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace *acl= vapi_alloc_acl_add_replace(ctx, 1);
if(acl==NULL)
{
printf("ACL retuns NULL %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
acl->payload.acl_index=-1;
strncpy((char *)acl->payload.tag,"CheckIsWorking",12);
acl->payload.count=1;
vapi_type_prefix src_addr,dst_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].is_permit=1;
src_addr.address.af=0;
src_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("172.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(src_addr.address.un.ip4));
dst_addr.address.af=0;
dst_addr.len=24;//prefix len
inet_aton("111.1.1.0",(struct in_addr *)&(dst_addr.address.un.ip4));
acl->payload.r[0].src_prefix=src_addr;
acl->payload.r[0].dst_prefix=dst_addr;
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_hton(acl);
rv = vapi_send (ctx, acl);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_reply *resp;
size_t size;
rv = vapi_recv (ctx, (void *) &resp, &size, 0, 0);
if(rv!=VAPI_OK)
{
printf("vapi_Send %d\n",__LINE__);
exit(1);
}
vapi_msg_acl_add_replace_reply_ntoh(resp);
printf("So the reply receivied ACL Index %d Retval
%d\n",resp->payload.acl_index,resp->payload.retval);
vapi_msg_free (ctx, resp);
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20049): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20049
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85263360/21656
Mute #vapi:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/vapi
Mute #acl_plugin:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl_plugin
Mute #acl:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mutehashtag/acl
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] vpp 2101 , we have to reduce the frame size to 128 for our use case
Hi, As 6windstack uses a vector size of 32 ,so for comparison we are doing some performance testing with VPP using different vector sizes. Thanks, Chetan On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 4:53 PM wrote: > Changing VLIB_FRAME_SIZE “should just work” but you could consider > adjusting whichever input node(s) you’re using to limit the inbound frame > size. > > > > Just to ask: why do you want to reduce the frame-size? > > > > D. > > > > *From:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *On Behalf Of *chetan > bhasin > *Sent:* Friday, August 27, 2021 1:38 AM > *To:* vpp-dev > *Subject:* [vpp-dev] vpp 2101 , we have to reduce the frame size to 128 > for our use case > > > > Hi, > > > > We have a use case where we have to reduce the frame-size to 128, > changing VLIB_FRAME_SIZE to 128 will do the trick ? or do we need to change > anything else other than this ? Please advise. > > > > Thanks, > > Chetan > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20050): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20050 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85179707/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
