Hi Peter, I just pushed [1] to address this issue. Let me know if the problem persists.
Florin [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4115/1 <https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4115/1> > On Dec 5, 2016, at 8:08 AM, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at > Cisco) <pmi...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hello vpp-dev, > > I would like to ask if anyone have idea what may be wrong? > > Thank you. > > Peter Mikus > Engineer – Software > Cisco Systems Limited > > From: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 7:58 AM > To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> > Cc: Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com > <mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>>; csit-...@lists.fd.io > <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io> > Subject: RE: CSIT encapsulation test are failing > > Hello vpp-dev, > > I’ve noticed that since dpdk-16.11 is merged in VPP, our encapsulation tests > for LISP IP4oIP4 and IP6oIP4 and also VXLANoIP4 is failing due to: > > vat# Count Node Reason > 999999 dpdk-input Rx L4 checksum errors > > This does not affect oIP6 encapsulations, which might be interesting to > compare. > > In DPDK16.11 I’ve found there was some rework regarding the Rx L4 checksum > handling in > (http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=9bc52f49fcfe2a499b1738700d857427c1433a5b > > <http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=9bc52f49fcfe2a499b1738700d857427c1433a5b>) > - Maybe it is not related but does anybody know by chance what might be the > issue? > > Packet traces attached. I do not see packets coming from interface with > encapsulation. Encapsulations are done between two VPP nodes. > > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > csit-dev mailing list > csit-...@lists.fd.io <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev > <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev>
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
