Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
Thanks, Ryan! It'd be interesting to see numbers for the same test on the same machine but using User-Mode Linux... :-) Grisha On Sat, 22 May 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:19:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just FYI... > > thanks for checking this for us ... > > Roderick: I asked Ryan to do those tests for us > to check the impact of linux vserver on typical > applications ... > > > Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel > > configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench. > > > > Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here: > > http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2 > > > > 2.6.6 > > vanilla1: 495.1 > > vanilla2: 494.7 > > vanilla3: 493.6 > > vanilla4: 494.1 > > average = 494.3 +/- 0.6 > > > 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in host > > host1: 496.7 > > host2: 494.1 > > host3: 496.1 > > host4: 497.3 > > average = 496 +/- 1.5 > > > 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in vserver > > vserver1: 452.0 (ignored) > > vserver2: 484.5 > > vserver3: 488.2 > > vserver4: 487.9 > > average = 486.8 +/- 2 > > so the overhead of linux vserver on the host > is not measurable (it seems that it is slightly > faster than a vanilla kernel, but within the > expected and measured noise) > > and the overhead inside a vserver is roughly > 2% which leaves us with 98% of the native > performance ... > > best, > Herbert > > > Test machine: > > Dual Xeon 2.8GHz > > Fedora Core 2 > > binutils-2.15.90.0.3 > > gcc-3.3.3 > > util-vserver-0.29-214 > > > > Cheers, > > Ryan > > > > > > ___ > > Vserver mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > ___ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:19:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just FYI... thanks for checking this for us ... Roderick: I asked Ryan to do those tests for us to check the impact of linux vserver on typical applications ... > Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel > configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench. > > Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here: > http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2 > > 2.6.6 > vanilla1: 495.1 > vanilla2: 494.7 > vanilla3: 493.6 > vanilla4: 494.1 average = 494.3 +/- 0.6 > 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in host > host1: 496.7 > host2: 494.1 > host3: 496.1 > host4: 497.3 average = 496 +/- 1.5 > 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in vserver > vserver1: 452.0 (ignored) > vserver2: 484.5 > vserver3: 488.2 > vserver4: 487.9 average = 486.8 +/- 2 so the overhead of linux vserver on the host is not measurable (it seems that it is slightly faster than a vanilla kernel, but within the expected and measured noise) and the overhead inside a vserver is roughly 2% which leaves us with 98% of the native performance ... best, Herbert > Test machine: > Dual Xeon 2.8GHz > Fedora Core 2 > binutils-2.15.90.0.3 > gcc-3.3.3 > util-vserver-0.29-214 > > Cheers, > Ryan > > > ___ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
On Fri, 21 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just FYI...
>
> Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel
> configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench.
>
> Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here:
> http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2
So Ryan. Could you explain for the 'kernelly-challenged' what these mean
-- in general?
Good, bad, or ugly?
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
Just FYI... Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench. Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here: http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2 2.6.6 vanilla1: 495.1 vanilla2: 494.7 vanilla3: 493.6 vanilla4: 494.1 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in host host1: 496.7 host2: 494.1 host3: 496.1 host4: 497.3 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in vserver vserver1: 452.0 vserver2: 484.5 vserver3: 488.2 vserver4: 487.9 Test machine: Dual Xeon 2.8GHz Fedora Core 2 binutils-2.15.90.0.3 gcc-3.3.3 util-vserver-0.29-214 Cheers, Ryan ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
