Re: [Vserver] CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-05-28 Thread gary ng
Thanks. The reason I said it is legitimate use is that
I saw people offer vserver based VDS solutions. After
a closer examine, I think vserver is more suitable for
host service only "jail" rather than a full featured
VDS(I had one before which use uml), so mainly for
internal server management(moving vserver from one
machine to another is much easier). 


--- Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:42:04AM -0700, gary ng
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am testing out vserver(1.2.10 on 2.4, not ready
> for
> > 2.6 yet because of stability issue unrelated to
> > vserver) and I am wondering what is the impact of
> > giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN to it.
> 
> well, it basically allows the vserver root to take
> over the host system quite easily ...
> 
> > Without it, I cannot mount within vserver but I
> see
> > mount as a legitimate use like mounting CIFS/NFS
> or
> > FUSE related file systems.
> 
> no, mounting filesystems (without special security)
> isn't a legitimate use on a vserver ...
> 
> you can do that in a more secure way with 2.6/1.9.x
> (but it isn't advisable anyway)
> 
> > Oh, while I am at it, what capability is needed so
> > that I can setup vpn(pptp, openvpn etc.) within
> the
> 
> you can set those things up from outside, or wait
> until ngnet (2.6 only) will become more mature ...
> 
> > vserver or it will the vserver no longer
> virtual(too
> > much rights so it can get out of the jail)?
> > 
> > thanks in advance for any help.
> 
> best,
> Herbert
> 
> > regards,
> > gary
> > 
> > PS. please CC if possible as I am not on the list
> > 
> 



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-05-28 Thread Bodo Eggert
On Sat, 28 May 2005, gary ng wrote:

> I am testing out vserver(1.2.10 on 2.4, not ready for
> 2.6 yet because of stability issue unrelated to
> vserver) and I am wondering what is the impact of
> giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN to it.
> 
> Without it, I cannot mount within vserver but I see
> mount as a legitimate use like mounting CIFS/NFS or
> FUSE related file systems.

You can also mount filesystems containing device nodes. This would give
you root access to the host.

Secure user mounts are planned in the vanilla kernel, maybe they can be 
adopted for vservers.
-- 
Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say:
45. Was that YOUR directory?
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-05-28 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:42:04AM -0700, gary ng wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am testing out vserver(1.2.10 on 2.4, not ready for
> 2.6 yet because of stability issue unrelated to
> vserver) and I am wondering what is the impact of
> giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN to it.

well, it basically allows the vserver root to take
over the host system quite easily ...

> Without it, I cannot mount within vserver but I see
> mount as a legitimate use like mounting CIFS/NFS or
> FUSE related file systems.

no, mounting filesystems (without special security)
isn't a legitimate use on a vserver ...

you can do that in a more secure way with 2.6/1.9.x
(but it isn't advisable anyway)

> Oh, while I am at it, what capability is needed so
> that I can setup vpn(pptp, openvpn etc.) within the

you can set those things up from outside, or wait
until ngnet (2.6 only) will become more mature ...

> vserver or it will the vserver no longer virtual(too
> much rights so it can get out of the jail)?
> 
> thanks in advance for any help.

best,
Herbert

> regards,
> gary
> 
> PS. please CC if possible as I am not on the list
> 
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] Confused by routing

2005-05-28 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:26:58PM +0200, Gilles wrote:
> 
> Hi Herbert,
> 
> Thanks a lot for this complete example.
> I'll muse on it (may take some time!).
> 
> Two small questions, to be sure:
> 
> 1. Everything is setup on the Host(s), nothing on the guest
>(i.e. in the "pre-start.d" et al. directories)?

the example isn't even vserver related ...

> 2. Vserver and QEMU setups are the same wrt connecting to the
>Host and outer world?

no, qemu has a virtual network which results in
a tun/tap device being set up, but that is compareable
to your 'real host' setup (with the bridge active)

best,
Herbert

> Best,
> Gilles
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] Start-Up Scipts

2005-05-28 Thread Björn Steinbrink
On 2005.05.27 18:15:34 +0200, Oliver Welter wrote:
> Hi List,
> 
> I have a little problem with vserver Start-up scriots...
> I am running Gentoo Host/Guest with 2.6.9 kernel and vserver-tools 0.30.196
> 
> 1) I have a vServer called "wwwmain" - I added a script "wwwmain.sh" in 
> /etc/vservers/ but it seems that this is never executed..

Then you are probably using a new style configuration, the
.sh is for the old style. The flower page lists the various
start/stop script possibilites.

HTH
Björn
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] Start-Up Scipts

2005-05-28 Thread Oliver Welter

Can you add the bind mount to /etc/vservers/wwwmain/fstab so that it
is mounted on startup?


Great this was exactly what I was looking for

Anyway - the startscript seems not to be called...any ideas on that ?

Oliver
--
Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben
oliwel's public key: http://www.oliwel.de/oliwel.crt
Basiszertifikat: http://www.ldv.ei.tum.de/page72


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


[Vserver] CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-05-28 Thread gary ng
Hi,

I am testing out vserver(1.2.10 on 2.4, not ready for
2.6 yet because of stability issue unrelated to
vserver) and I am wondering what is the impact of
giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN to it.

Without it, I cannot mount within vserver but I see
mount as a legitimate use like mounting CIFS/NFS or
FUSE related file systems.

Oh, while I am at it, what capability is needed so
that I can setup vpn(pptp, openvpn etc.) within the
vserver or it will the vserver no longer virtual(too
much rights so it can get out of the jail)?

thanks in advance for any help.

regards,
gary

PS. please CC if possible as I am not on the list



__ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver