[Vserver] alpha and dietlibc

2005-06-23 Thread James Boddington
There is a problem with programs compiled against dietlibc on alpha 
segfaulting when SIGHUP is trapped. This affects lockfile in the 
util-vserver package. It was suggested on irc that the flags and mask 
varibales in the sigaction struct for alpha were around the wrong way.


Swapping sa_flags and sa_mask makes the alpha section the same as the 
ia64 and hppa section. This patch also tidies that up. So far no more 
segfaults when trapping SIGHUP.


diff -urN dietlibc-0.29-orig/include/signal.h dietlibc-0.29/include/signal.h
--- dietlibc-0.29-orig/include/signal.h Tue Mar 15 18:51:22 2005
+++ dietlibc-0.29/include/signal.h  Thu Jun 23 15:46:02 2005
@@ -438,14 +438,7 @@
 } sigset_t;

 struct sigaction {
-#if defined(__alpha__)
-  union {
-sighandler_t _sa_handler;
-void (*_sa_sigaction)(int, siginfo_t*, void*);
-  } _u;
-  sigset_t sa_mask;
-  unsigned long sa_flags;
-#elif defined(__ia64__) || defined(__hppa__)
+#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__ia64__) || defined(__hppa__)
   union {
 sighandler_t _sa_handler;
 void (*_sa_sigaction)(int, siginfo_t*, void*);

--
   James
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


[Vserver] Re: capchroot: chroot(): Permission denied

2005-06-23 Thread Marc Fournier

 the debian tools/patches are broken, please
 switch to 2.0-rc4 and 0.30.207, then try again
 either with a new guest/volume or by removing
 any dubious permissions/flags from the guest
 root dir like this:
 
  chmod 755 /path/to/vserver/guest
  chattr -t -i /path/to/vserver/guest
  setattr --~barrier /path/to/vserver/guest

Thanks a lot. I'll try this and let you know if it doesn't solve the
problem.

Thanks again !
Marc


___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] alpha and dietlibc

2005-06-23 Thread Bodo Eggert
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, James Boddington wrote:

 diff -urN dietlibc-0.29-orig/include/signal.h dietlibc-0.29/include/signal.h
 --- dietlibc-0.29-orig/include/signal.h Tue Mar 15 18:51:22 2005
 +++ dietlibc-0.29/include/signal.h  Thu Jun 23 15:46:02 2005

Did you CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Bug? That's not a bug, that's a feature. 
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] alpha and dietlibc

2005-06-23 Thread James Boddington

Bodo Eggert wrote:

Did you CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I have also sent an email to that list.

--
   James
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


[Vserver] cannot remove directory

2005-06-23 Thread Oliver Dietz

Hello,

---
hostserver:/vservers/suse92/etc/rc.d # vserver suse92 start
WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method
Starting the virtual server suse92
Server suse92 is not running

rm: cannot remove `var/lock/subsys/sysconfig': Is a directory

ipv4root is now 192.168.0.180
Host name is now suse92
New security context is 49176
---

is the rm-error an problem inside my guest or a util-vserver problem?
Or should i just ignore it?

Thx,
Oliver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] Suse and Yast inside VServer

2005-06-23 Thread Oliver Dietz

Hi,


 I use SuSE SLES 9 guests, except I cheated.



Wow, thats great! Exactly what i need!

i've tried that one week ago (with suse 9.2 prof.) ...

(1) made 2 partitions
(2) installed suse to each partition (making 2 minimal installations)
(3) used the one as vserver-host, the other as a template for a vserver
(4) deploy-vserver ... skeleton
(5) copied the template to there
(6) replaced fstab
(7) done some thinks i don't remind


Yep I think 7) is where the problem is :) Luckily I remember what I 
did

mostly! The main problems are because of the way SuSE init works.


ok, started from the beginning - seem's to work now :-))


1) edit the main init script /vservers/foo/etc/init.d/rc and after the
initial comment, add:
RUNLEVEL=$1


ok, this was the point i didn't do ...


2) edit the /vservers/foo/etc/init.d/network script and put some exit
0's in it. Otherwise you get a hang on vserver startup/shutdown when the
guest tries to flush the interfaces/addresses or something.


hm, i had to comment-out and disable some other stuff ... things like 
hotplug-scan-on-boot and boot-logging to /dev/console (which does not exist 
inside a vserver) ... but no problem - the errors while vserver-start have 
pointed me in the right direction ;-)


Again, thx very much!
Oliver 


___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] Vserver with Luster CFS

2005-06-23 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:05:53AM -0600, Jon Scottorn wrote:
 Sorry, that was at the end of my day.  I can today if you guys are

yes, please do so ...

 there, or through email, which ever works for me.

best,
Herbert

 Thanks,
 
 Herbert Poetzl wrote:
 
 On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:55:54PM -0600, Jon Scottorn wrote:
   
 
 I have now upgraded to VS2.0-rc4 and I still have the same result.
 
 
 
 okay, looks like you're still? awake, so why not
 join us at #vserver, irc.oftc.net?
 
 best,
 Herbert
 
   
 
 I go to start the vserver and it stalls. Again these are the processes
 running
 
 pts/0S+ 0:00 /bin/bash /usr/local/sbin/vserver monitor start
  5677 pts/0S+ 0:00 /usr/local/lib/util-vserver/lockfile
 /var/lock/vserver.usrlocaletcvserversmonitor.startup
 5694 pts/0D+ 0:00 /usr/local/lib/util-vserver/chroot-cat /etc/mtab
 
 Here is what is reported in syslog when I start it as well:
 
 idr_remove called for id=639838 which is not allocated.
  [c01d983f] sub_remove+0xef/0x100
  [c017edbe] invalidate_list+0x2e/0xe0
  [c017eec5] invalidate_inodes+0x55/0x70
  [c01d987f] idr_remove+0x2f/0xc0
  [c016abc6] kill_anon_super+0x36/0x50
  [c016a141] deactivate_super+0x61/0x80
  [c018210c] sys_umount+0x4c/0xd0
  [c016de1b] sys_stat64+0x1b/0x40
  [c01821a5] sys_oldumount+0x15/0x20
  [c0103123] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 
 Any ideas on what I can try next to see if this will work?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jon
 
 Herbert Poetzl wrote:
 
 
 
 On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:53:25AM -0600, Jon Scottorn wrote:
  
 
   
 
 I will do some testing and yes we would really like it to work.  Lustre
 is an awesome cluster filesystem that combined with the vserver software
 would have cool functionality.  basically we cluster the vservers
 directory between a high end data server and have multiple front ends so
 that if any of the systems crash we can bring the vservers on that front
 end up within a couple of minutes of being down.

 
 
 
 sounds good, we are interested too :)
 
  
 
   
 
 I will try 2.6.12, but where do I get vs2-rc4? and will it possibily
 work with 2.6.11.11 kernel?

 
 
 
 yep, 
 
 http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.11.11-vs2.0-rc4.diff.bz2
 http://www.13thfloor.at/~doener/vserver/patches/patch-2.6.12-vs2.0-rc4.diff
 
 best,
 Herbert
 
  
 
   
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jon
 
 Herbert Poetzl wrote:
 

 
 
 
 On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:53:50PM -0600, Jon Scottorn wrote:
 
 
  
 
   
 
 Hello,
 
  I am wondering if the Vserver software works on a Lustre Cluster file
 system.  I have setup everything running linux 2.6.11.11 with Vserver
 1.9.5 and latest utils and when I go to start the vserver it stalls with
 no errors, but it never starts.  Here are the processes that are running
 at the time:
 
 4287 pts/0S+ 0:00 /bin/bash /usr/local/sbin/vserver awstats 
 start
 4297 pts/0S+ 0:00 /usr/local/lib/util-vserver/lockfile
 /var/lock/vserver.usrlocaletcvserversawstats.startup
 4314 pts/0D+ 0:00 /usr/local/lib/util-vserver/chroot-cat 
 /etc/mtab
 
 To fix it I have to kill these processes and then vserver gives this 
 error:
 
 /usr/local/lib/util-vserver/vserver.functions: line 653:  4297
 Terminated  $_LOCKFILE $1 $tmp $2  (wd: /vservers)
 
 
 Failed to start vserver 'awstats'
 Terminated
 
 Any ideas?
   
 

 
 
 
 first, try with 2.6.12 and vs2.0-rc4+ (tools 0.30.207),
 then make some 'basic' tests with the Lustre FS regarding
 namespaces, it might be, that it doesn't like them ...
 
 you can for example create/configure a guest to use chroot
 and avoid the namespaces ...
 
 it is also possible that the networking? part of Lustre
 is not able to bypass the chbind security ...
 
 anyway, if you know lustre details and/or are interested
 in making this work, then we can investigate/fix it ...
 but it will require some work (mainly testing/setup) on
 your side (AFAIK it wasn't tested with lustre yet) ...
 
 best,
 Herbert
 
 
 
  
 
   
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Jon S
 
 
 ___
 Vserver mailing list
 Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
   
 

 
 
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
 
 
   
 
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] cannot remove directory

2005-06-23 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:46:44PM +0200, Oliver Dietz wrote:
 Hello,
 
 ---
 hostserver:/vservers/suse92/etc/rc.d # vserver suse92 start
 WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method
 Starting the virtual server suse92
 Server suse92 is not running
 rm: cannot remove `var/lock/subsys/sysconfig': Is a directory

try:

cd /tmp
mkdir xxx
rm xxx
rm: cannot remove directory `xxx': Is a directory

maybe your rm 'forgot' to mention the 'directory' part?
(check with both rm, the host and the guest one)

if so, check that var/lock/subsys/sysconfig isn't
a directory (by some accident) ... if not, and you
are sure that your filesystem is okay, and no other
security related patches are present, let me know

(i.e. we will investigate it further)

best,
Herbert

 ipv4root is now 192.168.0.180
 Host name is now suse92
 New security context is 49176
 ---
 
 is the rm-error an problem inside my guest or a util-vserver problem?
 Or should i just ignore it?
 
 Thx,
 Oliver
 ___
 Vserver mailing list
 Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] cannot remove directory

2005-06-23 Thread Oliver Dietz

Hi Herbert,


rm: cannot remove `var/lock/subsys/sysconfig': Is a directory


maybe your rm 'forgot' to mention the 'directory' part?
(check with both rm, the host and the guest one)


---
stargate:/vservers/suse92/var/lock/subsys # ls -l
drwxr-xr-x  3 root root 4096 Jun 23 11:03 .
drwxrwxr-t  4 root uucp 4096 Jun 23 12:35 ..
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Oct 26  2004 sysconfig

stargate:/var/lock/subsys # ls -l
drwxr-xr-x  3 root root 4096 May 13 21:53 .
drwxrwxr-t  4 root uucp 4096 Jun 21 17:24 ..
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Oct 26  2004 sysconfig
---

sysconfig is a directory. Host and guest is both Suse 9.2 ...
Is this non-standart compared to other distros?


if so, check that var/lock/subsys/sysconfig isn't
a directory (by some accident) ... if not, and you
are sure that your filesystem is okay, and no other
security related patches are present, let me know

(i.e. we will investigate it further)


hm, does the util-vserver-tools remove that file/directory when starting a 
vserver?


Thx,
Oliver 


___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


[Vserver] Mailinglist

2005-06-23 Thread Timo Müller

PLEASE Herbet or somebody else,
remove me from this list !
I´ve  done it know 5 times but i think i do something wrong...

PLEASE REMOVE ME
PLEASE
This is Spam for me !!!

Greatz
Timo

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


[Vserver] solaris containers/zones

2005-06-23 Thread Matthew Nuzum
I just saw this article come through the big-admin newsletter. I don't
currently have any Solaris computers and I haven't used Solaris 10 (or 9 for
that matter), so all I can do is read about it. This seems kind of cool and
in-line with what my ideal linux-vserver usage would look like. I just use
vservers to logically separate applications so that as they grow they can
spin off to their own server w/out hassle. Of course, vserver is great for
that because it has so little resource overhead.

http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/submitted/dollar_container.html

The feature that strikes me as so intriguing is the ability to allocate CPU
resources to zones.

Also, look how they create a zone for tomcat. That strikes me as a very easy
to use tool (no editing config files, just use set).

Not that I'm trying to critique any of the work being done on vserver; I
just thought you might like a glimpse of one other way someone is doing this
sort of thing.

-- 
Matthew Nuzum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.followers.net - Makers of Elite Content Management System
View samples of Elite CMS in action by visiting
http://www.followers.net/portfolio/



___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] solaris containers/zones

2005-06-23 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:15:54PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
 I just saw this article come through the big-admin newsletter. I don't
 currently have any Solaris computers and I haven't used Solaris 10 (or 9 for
 that matter), so all I can do is read about it. This seems kind of cool and
 in-line with what my ideal linux-vserver usage would look like. I just use
 vservers to logically separate applications so that as they grow they can
 spin off to their own server w/out hassle. Of course, vserver is great for
 that because it has so little resource overhead.
 
 http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/submitted/dollar_container.html
 
 The feature that strikes me as so intriguing is the ability to allocate CPU
 resources to zones.
 
 Also, look how they create a zone for tomcat. That strikes me as a very easy
 to use tool (no editing config files, just use set).
 
 Not that I'm trying to critique any of the work being done on vserver; I
 just thought you might like a glimpse of one other way someone is doing this
 sort of thing.

hmm, you sure you know what linux-vserver 2.6/vs2.0 can do?

anyway, thanks for the input!

best,
Herbert

 -- 
 Matthew Nuzum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.followers.net - Makers of Elite Content Management System
 View samples of Elite CMS in action by visiting
 http://www.followers.net/portfolio/
 
 
 
 ___
 Vserver mailing list
 Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


RE: [Vserver] solaris containers/zones

2005-06-23 Thread Matthew Nuzum
  I just thought you might like a glimpse of one other way someone is
doing
 this
  sort of thing.
 
 hmm, you sure you know what linux-vserver 2.6/vs2.0 can do?
 
 anyway, thanks for the input!
 
 best,
 Herbert


:-[

I guess I don't... I'm running out of hardware to experiment with, so I
haven't been playing with the new stuff too much.

You know, if a distro wanted to get some media attention, they could put
some effort behind the vserver project and roll it into their distro as an
optional module with a nice config tool.

Of course, I don't know if vserver can be built as an optional module, I've
only built it into a vanilla kernel, but still... they could raise a lot of
hype and woo some enterprise (aka paying customer) market share, I think.

-- 
Matthew Nuzum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.followers.net - Makers of Elite Content Management System
View samples of Elite CMS in action by visiting
http://www.followers.net/portfolio/

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] solaris containers/zones

2005-06-23 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:36:29PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
   I just thought you might like a glimpse of one other way someone is
 doing
  this
   sort of thing.
  
  hmm, you sure you know what linux-vserver 2.6/vs2.0 can do?
  
  anyway, thanks for the input!
  
  best,
  Herbert
 
 
 :-[

 I guess I don't... I'm running out of hardware to experiment with, so I
 haven't been playing with the new stuff too much.

you can get a feeling by reading my paper or
just looking at the version matrix ...

http://linux-vserver.org/Linux-VServer-Paper
http://linux-vserver.org/Release+FAQ

 You know, if a distro wanted to get some media attention, they could put
 some effort behind the vserver project and roll it into their distro as an
 optional module with a nice config tool.

probably ...

 Of course, I don't know if vserver can be built as an optional module, I've

module is not really an option, we change too many
things which are not covered by LSM hooks or such

 only built it into a vanilla kernel, but still... they could raise a lot of
 hype and woo some enterprise (aka paying customer) market share, I think.

only time will tell ...

best,
Herbert

 -- 
 Matthew Nuzum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.followers.net - Makers of Elite Content Management System
 View samples of Elite CMS in action by visiting
 http://www.followers.net/portfolio/
 
 ___
 Vserver mailing list
 Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


RE: [Vserver] solaris containers/zones

2005-06-23 Thread Mike Tierney
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Nuzum
 Sent: Friday, 24 June 2005 5:36 a.m.
 To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 Subject: RE: [Vserver] solaris containers/zones
 
   I just thought you might like a glimpse of one other way someone is
 doing
  this
   sort of thing.
 
  hmm, you sure you know what linux-vserver 2.6/vs2.0 can do?

 I guess I don't... I'm running out of hardware to experiment with, so I
 haven't been playing with the new stuff too much.

VMware Workstation (virtual machine software) will let you have as many
different distributions of Linux (or *BSD or Solaris 10) running as you have
disk space for. It has both Windows and Linux versions. It costs money to
buy the software but you can download an Evaluation Copy. It also lets you
clone your virtual machines as well, or even snapshot them while they are
running. Great tool for messing about with stuff and/or cross-platform
development.

 You know, if a distro wanted to get some media attention, they could put
 some effort behind the vserver project and roll it into their distro as an
 optional module with a nice config tool.

As much as I like Vservers (we use them on 2 of our Production servers!!) it
looks like the Xen project (open source virtual machine software) IS getting
LOTS of media coverage and attention/resources from vendors (Novell, IBM,
Sun, HP, Redhat, etc). Apparently the current version (v2) isn't that great
but the next version (due out in August) sounds like a huge leap forward.
Even though its virtual machines rather than virtual servers, they claim way
less overhead than other Virtual Machine software (like the VMware server
products).

Check out http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/15/xen_goes_three

Then do a few googles and you find lots of other interesting stuff, like IBM
sinking research people into making a security enchanced version (XenSE),
etc.

 Of course, I don't know if vserver can be built as an optional module,
 I've only built it into a vanilla kernel, but still... they could raise a
lot
 of hype and woo some enterprise (aka paying customer) market share, I
think.

Xen RPM's are available for some distro's now and the two big Enterprise
players (Redhat and SuSE) are incorporating it into their next major
release. It's also going into the mainstream 2.6 kernel soon.

Anyway, I like Vservers. I use Vservers. However owing to the luck of the
draw it looks like Xen is getting lots and LOTS of attention.

Having said that, I'd not run a Production server on it yet! So I'll be
sticking with Vservers for another 10 months at least.

Then again, if the Solaris people got their Linux emulation stuff (Janus?)
working properly, you could also run your Linux servers inside Solaris
Containers!

___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


Re: [Vserver] solaris containers/zones

2005-06-23 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 09:39:38AM +1200, Mike Tierney wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Nuzum
  Sent: Friday, 24 June 2005 5:36 a.m.
  To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
  Subject: RE: [Vserver] solaris containers/zones
  
I just thought you might like a glimpse of one other way someone is
  doing
   this
sort of thing.
  
   hmm, you sure you know what linux-vserver 2.6/vs2.0 can do?
 
  I guess I don't... I'm running out of hardware to experiment with, so I
  haven't been playing with the new stuff too much.
 
 VMware Workstation (virtual machine software) will let you have as many
 different distributions of Linux (or *BSD or Solaris 10) running as you have
 disk space for. It has both Windows and Linux versions. It costs money to
 buy the software but you can download an Evaluation Copy. It also lets you
 clone your virtual machines as well, or even snapshot them while they are
 running. Great tool for messing about with stuff and/or cross-platform
 development.
 
  You know, if a distro wanted to get some media attention, they could put
  some effort behind the vserver project and roll it into their distro as an
  optional module with a nice config tool.
 
 As much as I like Vservers (we use them on 2 of our Production servers!!) it
 looks like the Xen project (open source virtual machine software) IS getting
 LOTS of media coverage and attention/resources from vendors (Novell, IBM,
 Sun, HP, Redhat, etc). Apparently the current version (v2) isn't that great
 but the next version (due out in August) sounds like a huge leap forward.
 Even though its virtual machines rather than virtual servers, they claim way
 less overhead than other Virtual Machine software (like the VMware server
 products).
 
 Check out http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/15/xen_goes_three

also check out:

http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_05/focus-linux_vserver/

 Then do a few googles and you find lots of other interesting stuff, like IBM
 sinking research people into making a security enchanced version (XenSE),
 etc.
 
  Of course, I don't know if vserver can be built as an optional module,
  I've only built it into a vanilla kernel, but still... they could raise a
 lot
  of hype and woo some enterprise (aka paying customer) market share, I
 think.
 
 Xen RPM's are available for some distro's now and the two big Enterprise
 players (Redhat and SuSE) are incorporating it into their next major
 release. It's also going into the mainstream 2.6 kernel soon.
 
 Anyway, I like Vservers. I use Vservers. However owing to the luck of the
 draw it looks like Xen is getting lots and LOTS of attention.
 
 Having said that, I'd not run a Production server on it yet! So I'll be
 sticking with Vservers for another 10 months at least.
 
 Then again, if the Solaris people got their Linux emulation stuff (Janus?)
 working properly, you could also run your Linux servers inside Solaris
 Containers!

which means you get less features for a higher price,
so what's the point there? the solaris compatibility?

best,
Herbert

 ___
 Vserver mailing list
 Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver