Re: [Vserver] 2.6.14-vs2.1.diff

2005-11-01 Thread Gebhardt Thomas 
Hi,

is there (or will there be) a 2.6.14-vs2.0.diff ?
Or is vs2.1 considered to be stable for a production
environment?

Thanks, Thomas
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] 2.6.14-vs2.1.diff

2005-11-01 Thread Herbert Poetzl 
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:13:31PM +0200, Gebhardt Thomas wrote:
 Hi,
 
 is there (or will there be) a 2.6.14-vs2.0.diff ?
 Or is vs2.1 considered to be stable for a production
 environment?

no 2.6.14-vs2.0 diff, but a 2.6.14-vs2.0.1 (soon)

http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.14-vs2.0.1-pre3-prelim.diff.bz2

vs2.1.x is the devel branch, and it is available here:

http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.14-vs2.1.0-rc5-prelim.diff.bz2


HTH,
Herbert

 Thanks, Thomas
 ___
 Vserver mailing list
 Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

[Vserver] Mirgation to vserver / Suse / kernel 2.4 guest

2005-11-01 Thread Andreas John 
Hi!

I tried to migrate an existing server with suse 7.2 to a linux-vserver.
I am running vs20.

I proceeded as follows:

vserver foo build -m skeleton --hostname foo.bar.de --netdev eth0
--interface 1.2.3.4/24 --context 126 --

and then I copied all /* of the former server to /var/lib/servers/foo/
(except /dev/*).

When I do a vserver -v foo start I tries to start and changes the
context.But vserver-stat does not show up the machine.
/var/run/servers/foo still exists, so I assume the vserver crashed
silently while starting. Even a vserver --debug foo start did not
reveal much information. An strace -f waited forever for a forked child.

What else can I try? May it be a problem that the guest was a kernel
2.4.x before? Of did I forget something while migrating?

rgds,
Andreas


___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] PPC build failure of util-vserver

2005-11-01 Thread Enrico Scholz 
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 as you can see in
 

 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/349-util-vserver-0.30.209-2.fc5/ppc/build.log
 
 two check of util-vserver 0.30.209 are failing on a PPC machine.
 ...
 http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/MANDRAKE/util-vserver-0.30.209-1mdk.src.rpm

 involves just a small patch which disables the addr_limit_3gb tests,
 as they did never work on mandrake (because of the missing flag)

should not be relevant here ('cflags' testcase does not use this flag)

 PASS: lib/testsuite/cflags
 PASS: lib/testsuite/personality
 ...
 and compiled fine (and works fine) on my ppc laptop

 maybe it is a compiler/fc* issue?

I added some more debugging (giving out line numbers) and at least the
'personality' testcase succeeded... OOM killer does not seem to be it
neither. New build at

  
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/415-util-vserver-0.30.209-3.fc5/ppc/build.log

gives me the binaries which are available at

  http://ensc.de/vserver/cflags
  http://ensc.de/vserver/personality


They are running fine in 'qemu-ppc' but I am not sure if qemu is
working. It would be nice when the two programs above can be tested
on a native box (statically linked, run as non-root).



TIA
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] Mirgation to vserver / Suse / kernel 2.4 guest

2005-11-01 Thread Andreas John 
Hello!

Answering to myself: I played around with parameters at random, setting
the init style to plain helped:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/vservers/dagobert/apps/init/style
plain


rgds,
j.



___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] PPC build failure of util-vserver

2005-11-01 Thread Herbert Poetzl 
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:11:59AM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
 Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  as you can see in
  
 
  http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/349-util-vserver-0.30.209-2.fc5/ppc/build.log
  
  two check of util-vserver 0.30.209 are failing on a PPC machine.
  ...
  http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/MANDRAKE/util-vserver-0.30.209-1mdk.src.rpm
 
  involves just a small patch which disables the addr_limit_3gb tests,
  as they did never work on mandrake (because of the missing flag)
 
 should not be relevant here ('cflags' testcase does not use this flag)
 
  PASS: lib/testsuite/cflags
  PASS: lib/testsuite/personality
  ...
  and compiled fine (and works fine) on my ppc laptop
 
  maybe it is a compiler/fc* issue?
 
 I added some more debugging (giving out line numbers) and at least the
 'personality' testcase succeeded... OOM killer does not seem to be it
 neither. New build at
 
   
 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/415-util-vserver-0.30.209-3.fc5/ppc/build.log
 
 gives me the binaries which are available at
 
   http://ensc.de/vserver/cflags
   http://ensc.de/vserver/personality

$ ./cflags 
Killed

$ ./personality 
Killed

here are my versions:

http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/UTIL-VSERVER/cflags
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/UTIL-VSERVER/personality

(which work flawlessly)

best,
Herbert

 They are running fine in 'qemu-ppc' but I am not sure if qemu is
 working. It would be nice when the two programs above can be tested
 on a native box (statically linked, run as non-root).
 
 TIA
 Enrico
 ___
 Vserver mailing list
 Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
 http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver