[Vserver] Re: www.virtualinfrastructure.nl
Have you tried checking the domain at www.nic.nl ? Joep's phone number is listed there... Regards, Evert Guenther Fuchs wrote: Hi there, as Joep Gommers of virtualinfrastructure.nl seems unavailable and his site contains lots of Casino spam entries (possibly beeing hacked, although probably only beeing spammed down) I removed his link from the start page. This abviousely also effects the Logo contest, which got spammed down as well 8-( Anyone having contact to Joep to get this sorted? ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: www.virtualinfrastructure.nl
Hi guys, currently in plane over sweden. On business im afraid, i've seen most emails and ill be fixing things up real soon. When i have, you'll be the first to know. Phone listed is depricated, but though private email you can get the good one. Cheers,Thanks for the passionate dealings for vserver,J-On 3/7/06, Evert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Have you tried checking the domain at www.nic.nl ?Joep's phone number is listed there...Regards,EvertGuenther Fuchs wrote: Hi there, as Joep Gommers of virtualinfrastructure.nl seems unavailable and his site contains lots of Casino spam entries (possibly beeing hacked, although probably only beeing spammed down) I removed his link from the start page. This abviousely also effects the Logo contest, which got spammed down as well 8-( Anyone having contact to Joep to get this sorted?___ Vserver mailing listVserver@list.linux-vserver.orghttp://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] sendfile in kernel 2.6.16r5 broken ?
Hello everyone, Is the sendfile kernel option broken in 2.6.16rc5 or only together with vserver ? Wenn I am running kernel 2.6.16rc5 with the vserver patch vs2.1.1-rc10 I have to deaktivate sendfile in Apache because it is broken. Are their other things to be broken in the dev version ? Martin ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] stucked file on xfs (x86_64)
Hi,
I've a weird problem, sometimes a random file stucks after 1-2 weeks
uptime on a xfs partition within a vs. the xfs is laying on lvm2
dm-crypto, userspace is 32bit Debian, kernel is AMD64. I using vs since
2.6.14.4-2.1.x but I changed to 2.6.15.2-2.1.0.5.1 when this problem
appeared and I hoped that it will solve it - but unfortunately not..
today I got another stucked file, the process goes to state 'D' if I
try to stat or open it. another files in this directory are working
well.
It's a highly loaded file server and I never had same problem outside
the vs, so I think it isn't a generic xfs problem. I've noticed that
too, this lockup happens on mass rm'ing of files, but of course not on
every mass rm.. as I said, it's a really big file server with millions
of files, please think twice before you say xfs? vs? it's works for me
at home! :)
the details..
dmesg is empty on the host, no panic or same.
this kernel process is stucked on the host:
root 15062 0.4 0.0 00 ?DMar06 6:15 [pdflush]
vs:/# uname -a
Linux vs 2.6.15.2-vs2.1.0.5.1 #4 SMP Tue Feb 14 18:15:09 CET 2006 x86_64
GNU/Linux
vs:/# uptime
18:26:21 up 9 days, 8:36, 2 users, load average: 30.5, 30.5, 30.2
- it's not real load, I've kicked out the users, no network traffic
vs:/# cat /proc/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
/dev/root / ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/mapper/blv /mirror/pub xfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
/dev/mapper/bvlv /mirror/pub/fsn xfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
none /proc proc rw,nodiratime,nodev 0 0
none /tmp tmpfs rw,nodev 0 0
none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
/dev2/root2 /bin ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
/dev2/root2 /sbin ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
/dev2/root2 /lib ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
/dev2/root2 /lib/modules ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
/dev2/root2 /usr ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
/dev2/root2 /usr/local ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
/dev2/root2 /etc/terminfo ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
/dev2/root2 /etc/alternatives ext3 ro,nodev,data=ordered 0 0
vs:/# ps axu(too long to paste here, cutted)
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 1 0.0 0.0 1516 464 ?SFeb26 0:01 init [3]
root 11733 0.0 0.0 1848 540 ?SN Feb26 0:01
/usr/sbin/inetutils-inetd -R 120
root 11757 0.0 0.0 3368 516 ?SNs Feb26 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd
root 11799 0.0 0.0 1764 588 ?SNs Feb26 0:00 /usr/sbin/cron
#497 11763 0.0 0.0 4128 960 ?DN 09:20 0:31 ftpd
#492 19892 0.0 0.0 4140 960 ?DN 09:31 0:06 ftpd
#497 26474 0.0 0.0 4008 928 ?DN 09:39 0:00 ftpd
#492 28038 0.0 0.0 4128 956 ?DN 09:40 0:00 ftpd
#497 2061 0.0 0.0 4008 928 ?DN 09:48 0:00 ftpd
#497 2405 0.0 0.0 4008 928 ?DN 09:49 0:00 ftpd
#497 3524 0.0 0.0 4128 956 ?DN 09:50 0:00 ftpd
root 16748 0.0 0.0 1912 508 ?DN 11:30 0:00
/opt/bin/myglinsert 3 bla bla
root 25866 0.0 0.0 1916 508 ?DN 13:30 0:00
/opt/bin/myglinsert 3 bla bla
...
vs:/# ls -l /proc/19892/fd/
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:32 0 - socket:[33836916]
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:32 1 - socket:[33836916]
l-wx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:32 2 - /dev/null
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:32 6 - /mirror/pub/lacee/site
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:32 7 - socket:[33850456]
vs:/# ls -l /proc/2405/fd/
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:34 0 - socket:[33884876]
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:34 1 - socket:[33884876]
l-wx-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:34 2 - /dev/null
lr-x-- 1 root root 64 Mar 7 18:34 6 - /mirror/pub/lacee/site
..the rest is same..
vs:/# stat /mirror/pub/lacee/site
File: `/mirror/pub/lacee/site'
Size: 4096Blocks: 16 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: fd14h/64788dInode: 1613995234 Links: 3
Access: (0777/drwxrwxrwx) Uid: ( 497/ UNKNOWN) Gid: ( 9500/ UNKNOWN)
Access: 2006-03-07 18:30:07.769923805 +0100
Modify: 2006-03-07 09:36:30.683606795 +0100
Change: 2006-03-07 09:36:30.683606795 +0100
vs:/# cd /mirror/pub/lacee/site
vs:site# ls | wc -l
84
vs:site# for i in *; do echo $i; stat $i; done
...
bc-me2bo.r49
[oops, 'stat' locked on this file!]
SysRQ+t - very long, copied only the stucked processes, but not all of
them is here, cause the 'dmesg' buffer is too small and I haven't a
serial console :(
kernel: myglinsertD 81003438c000 0 16748 16740
kernel: 810013347ce8 0086 0292
kernel:0292 0008
81007b708260
kernel:0292 880e3596
kernel: Call Trace:880e3596{:xfs:xfs_iunlock+102}
8019fa8f{__d_lookup+159}
kernel:803deea1{__down_read+129}
880fc211{:xfs:xfs_getattr+65}
kernel:8810d23b{:xfs:vn_revalidate+59}
[Vserver] [x86] 2.6.15.4-vs2.0.2-rc10 works with FC4
Hi there, tested on FC4 host system: # testme.sh -v -A Linux-VServer Test [V0.15] Copyright (C) 2003-2006 H.Poetzl chcontext is working. chbind is working. chcontext 0.30.210 -- allocates/enters a security context This program is part of util-vserver 0.30.210 Copyright (C) 2004 Enrico Scholz This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty. Linux 2.6.15.4-vs2.0.2-rc10 #4 Tue Mar 7 18:36:50 CET 2006 i686 Ea 0.30.210 273/glibc (DSa) v13,net VCI: 0002:0001 273 0316 (TbLgnP) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc-Version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)) #4 Tue Mar 7 18:36:50 CET 2006 --- [000]# chcontext true chcontext --xid 45678 true [000]# succeeded. [001]# chcontext --xid 45678 egrep 'context|VxID' /proc/self/status [001]# succeeded. [011]# chcontext --secure --xid 45678 mknod /tmp/testme.sh.OF8312/node c 0 0 [011]# succeeded. [031]# chcontext --hostname zaphod.8309 uname -a | grep -q zaphod.8309 [031]# succeeded. [101]# chbind --ip 192.168.0.42 true [101]# succeeded. [102]# chbind --ip 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0 --ip 10.0.0.1/24 true [102]# succeeded. [201]# chcontext --xid 45678 --flag fakeinit bash -c 'test $$ -eq 1' [201]# succeeded. [202]# chcontext --flag fakeinit bash -c 'test $$ -eq 1' [202]# succeeded. -- regards 'n greez, Guenther Fuchs (aka muh and powerfox) ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] No luck with chroot-barrier
I can't seem to get the chroot-barrier to work. == in guest, before setting chroot-barrier == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ date Tue Mar 7 21:43:19 UTC 2006 == in host, turning on chroot-barrier == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo setattr --barrier /var/lib/vservers/rice == in guest, after chroot-barrier == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ date -bash: /bin/date: Permission denied I'm running Ubuntu Dapper Drake, with the kernels and tools from here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VServer which links to here: http://www2.uni-klu.ac.at/support/VServer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l | grep vserver ii util-vserver 0.30.209-2 tools for Virtual private servers and contex ii vserver-debiantools 0.2.5 Tools to manage debian virtual servers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux mystic 2.6.15-17-686 #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 21 22:10:08 CET 2006 i686 GNU/Linux From the Ubuntu wiki page, it appears the kernel has Vserver version 2.0.1.2 applied against the (near) latest Ubuntu Dapper kernel, as listed above. Haven't confirmed that though. Am I doing something wrong with the setattr command? Or is something other than me broken? Tony Lewis ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] No luck with chroot-barrier
On 2006.03.08 09:10:39 +1100, Tony and Robyn Lewis wrote: I can't seem to get the chroot-barrier to work. == in guest, before setting chroot-barrier == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ date Tue Mar 7 21:43:19 UTC 2006 == in host, turning on chroot-barrier == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo setattr --barrier /var/lib/vservers/rice The barrier should be set on the parent directory, so the correct thing to do would be: setattr --barrier /var/lib/vservers/rice/.. == in guest, after chroot-barrier == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ date -bash: /bin/date: Permission denied Yep, cause you just denied access to the guest's / directory :) HTH Björn ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] No luck with chroot-barrier
Bjrn Steinbrink wrote: On 2006.03.08 09:10:39 +1100, Tony and Robyn Lewis wrote: == in host, turning on chroot-barrier == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo setattr --barrier /var/lib/vservers/rice The barrier should be set on the parent directory, so the correct thing to do would be: setattr --barrier /var/lib/vservers/rice/.. Nuts. Brain glossed over that in the doco any number of times. Thanks. Tony Lewis ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
