Re: [Vserver] iproute2 behavior problem
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:32:12PM -0500, Chuck wrote: > i am assuming this behavior is in recent iproute2 changes. previously > on an x86 machine last year, 140 ip addys on one nic would load very > fast. > > now, on amd64 current versions, it pauses 2 whole seconds between ip > addys!! when you add them? remove them? or just view them? could be an overeager nameservice reverse lookup trying to find a name to your IPs :) HTH, Herbert > it is intolerable. does anyone have a fix for this or know what causes > it? too little information ... best, Herbert > -- > > Chuck > > ___ > Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Just for info about 2.6.19
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:12:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried util-vserver-0.30.212 with kernel-2.6.19: compil ok, starting
> vservers ok . Just a little bug :
>
> trying vserver vweb1 enter : ok but the prompt indicates always vweb3 as i'm
> in vweb1's context :
>
> srvweb:/usr/local/util-vserver-0.30.212-rc2# vserver vweb1 enter
> WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method
> ipv4root is now 192.168.0.230
> New security context is 49152
> vweb3:/# ip addr
> 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:16:17:1a:69:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 192.168.0.230/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global secondary
> eth0:vweb1
> vweb3:/# exit
> logout
> srvweb:/usr/local/util-vserver-0.30.212-rc2# vserver vweb3 enter
> WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method
legacy will not work either .. although we might
be able to work around that in the future
HTH,
Herbert
> ipv4root is now 192.168.0.232
> New security context is 49154
> vweb3:/# ip addr
> 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:16:17:1a:69:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 192.168.0.232/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global secondary
> eth0:vweb3
> vweb3:/#
>
> Patrick
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Herbert Poetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vserver] Just for info about 2.6.19
>
>
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 06:48:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm using util-vserver 0.30.211
> >
> > which does not support 2.6.19 kernels, because
> > mainline changed in regard of virtualization
> > in back then 'unexpected' ways ...
> >
> > please update to 0.30.212+
> >
> > best,
> > Herbert
> >
> > > srvweb:/etc/bind# vserver-info
> > > Versions:
> > >Kernel: 2.6.18.3-vs2.1.1.2
> > >VS-API: 0x00020102
> > > util-vserver: 0.30.211; Oct 18 2006, 14:38:29
> > >
> > > Features:
> > >CC: gcc, gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
> > > CXX: g++, g++ (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
> > > CPPFLAGS: ''
> > >CFLAGS: '-g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W'
> > > CXXFLAGS:
> > > '-g -O2 -ansi -Wall -pedantic -W -fmessage-length=0'
> > >build/host: i686-pc-linux-gnu/i686-pc-linux-gnu
> > > Use dietlibc: yes
> > >Build C++ programs: yes
> > >Build C99 programs: yes
> > >Available APIs: compat,v11,fscompat,v13,net,oldproc,olduts
> > > ext2fs Source: e2fsprogs
> > > syscall(2) invocation: alternative
> > > vserver(2) syscall#: 273/glibc
> > >
> > > Paths:
> > >prefix: /usr/local
> > > sysconf-Directory: ${prefix}/etc
> > > cfg-Directory: ${prefix}/etc/vservers
> > > initrd-Directory: $(sysconfdir)/init.d
> > >pkgstate-Directory: ${prefix}/var/run/vservers
> > > vserver-Rootdir: /opt/vservers
> > >
> > >
> > > Assumed 'SYSINFO' as no other option given; try '--help' for more
> > > information.
> > >
> > > ===
> > > srvweb:/etc/bind# vserver-stat
> > > CTX PROCVSZRSS userTIME sysTIMEUPTIME NAME
> > > 0 84 985.7M 219.2M 4m17s11 1m51s38 6h50m05 root server
> > > 49152 18 421M 119.7M 0m07s54 0m01s11 6h49m08
> > > 49153 16 838.4M 85.8M 0m03s14 0m03s62 6h48m54
> > > 49154 1166M 23.4M 0m00s33 0m00s40 6h48m41
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 6:02 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Vserver] Just for info about 2.6.19
> > >
> > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > Hello
> > > > >
> > > > > I try new release today (patch-2.6.19-vs2.1.x-t1.diff) but it
> doesn't
> > > work
> > > > > properly : boot ok, starting vserver ok but it doesn't switch
> context i
> > > > > think.
> > > > >
> > > > > I try to explain :
> > > > > my master is : srvweb
> > > > > So i try :
> > > > > srvweb:/#vserver vweb1 start
> > > > > srvweb:/#vserver vweb2 start
> > > > > srvweb:/#vserver vweb3 start
> > > > >
> > > > > All seems to work fine but suddenly the prompt is changing :
> vweb3:/#
> > > > > whereas i didn't enter into vserver !!! The context-ID are OK in
> > > > > /usr/local/var/run/vservers/vwebX.ctx
> > > > > but i can't never get out from vweb3 !!! i've seen on the tty1 a
> > > message :
> > > > > get_ctx_id() and the prompt was changing alone whereas i wasn't
> loggued
> > > on
> > > > > this tty.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then i enter into vserver vweb3 and i try to leave it with CTRL-D :
> it
> > > stays
> > > > > in vweb3 in the home directory of user with which i connect to the
> > > master !
> > > > > I can never come back to
Re: [Vserver] numa option
On Saturday 02 December 2006 16:26, Bert De Vuyst wrote: Thank you. Clears it all up now.. good. > On Saturday 02 December 2006 04:45, Chuck wrote: > > i have this option turned on via recommendation of the help, but i see then > > talking about dual core opteron and em64t in the same breath. what is em64t > > and would i have it with a tyan mobo and dual opteron multicore processors? > > EM64 is a INTEL Xeon/woodcrest with 64bit extentions. > These systems use a shared bus for there CPUs. (no NUMA) > > a AMD dual Opteron system uses NUMA. (both for single and dual core) > a single AMD Opteron dual core doesn't use UNMA. > > Best regards, > > Bert. > > > > > CONFIG_NUMA: > > Enable NUMA (Non Uniform Memory Access) support. The kernel > > will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the local memory > > controller of the CPU and add some more NUMA awareness to the kernel. > > This code is recommended on all multiprocessor Opteron systems. > > If the system is EM64T, you should say N unless your system is EM64T > > NUMA > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > -- Chuck "...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger, and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. " The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] numa option
On Saturday 02 December 2006 04:45, Chuck wrote: > i have this option turned on via recommendation of the help, but i see then > talking about dual core opteron and em64t in the same breath. what is em64t > and would i have it with a tyan mobo and dual opteron multicore processors? EM64 is a INTEL Xeon/woodcrest with 64bit extentions. These systems use a shared bus for there CPUs. (no NUMA) a AMD dual Opteron system uses NUMA. (both for single and dual core) a single AMD Opteron dual core doesn't use UNMA. Best regards, Bert. > > CONFIG_NUMA: > Enable NUMA (Non Uniform Memory Access) support. The kernel > will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the local memory > controller of the CPU and add some more NUMA awareness to the kernel. > This code is recommended on all multiprocessor Opteron systems. > If the system is EM64T, you should say N unless your system is EM64T > NUMA ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] resource management
On Saturday 02 December 2006 09:48, Michael S. Zick wrote: do you or anyone know if this kernel has the memory page/reiser problem? 2.6.17-vs2.0.2.1-gentoo also compiled with 2006.1 profile, gcc4.1.1 and the new glibc i have it installed for vservers in case i need an emergency server to add but it will normally not have guests installed. this machine is an x86 4xp3 machine being set up as our NAS backup storage server (also running reiser on lvm2). > On Fri December 1 2006 22:56, Chuck wrote: > > On Friday 01 December 2006 21:51, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > > > i installed this new kernel, and decided to reboot immediately. there is a > > CONSIDERABLE difference in the amount of initial memory used! i have never > > seen this machine this low before. 680mb. typically startup memory has always > > been around 900mb. > > > > Super! > > > there is also a noticable difference in the response of the machine.. time > > will tell. > > > > A personal record: 2.6.18.2 is the only kernel that ever trashed my reiserfs. > I have been beating on 2.6.18.3 for over a week now with no problems found. > > > thanks for the info! > > > > i still need to find out if i need to set file handles higher etc, and how to > > do that. > > > > I do not have a clue to that question. Someone on the list that is running > a high resource requirement installation will have to comment on that. > > > > > Mike > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > -- Chuck "...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger, and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. " The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] resource management
On Fri December 1 2006 22:56, Chuck wrote: > On Friday 01 December 2006 21:51, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > i installed this new kernel, and decided to reboot immediately. there is a > CONSIDERABLE difference in the amount of initial memory used! i have never > seen this machine this low before. 680mb. typically startup memory has always > been around 900mb. > Super! > there is also a noticable difference in the response of the machine.. time > will tell. > A personal record: 2.6.18.2 is the only kernel that ever trashed my reiserfs. I have been beating on 2.6.18.3 for over a week now with no problems found. > thanks for the info! > > i still need to find out if i need to set file handles higher etc, and how to > do that. > I do not have a clue to that question. Someone on the list that is running a high resource requirement installation will have to comment on that. > Mike ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Just for info about 2.6.19
Hello,
I've tried util-vserver-0.30.212 with kernel-2.6.19: compil ok, starting
vservers ok . Just a little bug :
trying vserver vweb1 enter : ok but the prompt indicates always vweb3 as i'm
in vweb1's context :
srvweb:/usr/local/util-vserver-0.30.212-rc2# vserver vweb1 enter
WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method
ipv4root is now 192.168.0.230
New security context is 49152
vweb3:/# ip addr
2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:16:17:1a:69:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.230/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global secondary
eth0:vweb1
vweb3:/# exit
logout
srvweb:/usr/local/util-vserver-0.30.212-rc2# vserver vweb3 enter
WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method
ipv4root is now 192.168.0.232
New security context is 49154
vweb3:/# ip addr
2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:16:17:1a:69:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.232/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global secondary
eth0:vweb3
vweb3:/#
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: "Herbert Poetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Vserver] Just for info about 2.6.19
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 06:48:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using util-vserver 0.30.211
>
> which does not support 2.6.19 kernels, because
> mainline changed in regard of virtualization
> in back then 'unexpected' ways ...
>
> please update to 0.30.212+
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
> > srvweb:/etc/bind# vserver-info
> > Versions:
> >Kernel: 2.6.18.3-vs2.1.1.2
> >VS-API: 0x00020102
> > util-vserver: 0.30.211; Oct 18 2006, 14:38:29
> >
> > Features:
> >CC: gcc, gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
> > CXX: g++, g++ (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
> > CPPFLAGS: ''
> >CFLAGS: '-g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W'
> > CXXFLAGS:
> > '-g -O2 -ansi -Wall -pedantic -W -fmessage-length=0'
> >build/host: i686-pc-linux-gnu/i686-pc-linux-gnu
> > Use dietlibc: yes
> >Build C++ programs: yes
> >Build C99 programs: yes
> >Available APIs: compat,v11,fscompat,v13,net,oldproc,olduts
> > ext2fs Source: e2fsprogs
> > syscall(2) invocation: alternative
> > vserver(2) syscall#: 273/glibc
> >
> > Paths:
> >prefix: /usr/local
> > sysconf-Directory: ${prefix}/etc
> > cfg-Directory: ${prefix}/etc/vservers
> > initrd-Directory: $(sysconfdir)/init.d
> >pkgstate-Directory: ${prefix}/var/run/vservers
> > vserver-Rootdir: /opt/vservers
> >
> >
> > Assumed 'SYSINFO' as no other option given; try '--help' for more
> > information.
> >
> > ===
> > srvweb:/etc/bind# vserver-stat
> > CTX PROCVSZRSS userTIME sysTIMEUPTIME NAME
> > 0 84 985.7M 219.2M 4m17s11 1m51s38 6h50m05 root server
> > 49152 18 421M 119.7M 0m07s54 0m01s11 6h49m08
> > 49153 16 838.4M 85.8M 0m03s14 0m03s62 6h48m54
> > 49154 1166M 23.4M 0m00s33 0m00s40 6h48m41
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 6:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Vserver] Just for info about 2.6.19
> >
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hello
> > > >
> > > > I try new release today (patch-2.6.19-vs2.1.x-t1.diff) but it
doesn't
> > work
> > > > properly : boot ok, starting vserver ok but it doesn't switch
context i
> > > > think.
> > > >
> > > > I try to explain :
> > > > my master is : srvweb
> > > > So i try :
> > > > srvweb:/#vserver vweb1 start
> > > > srvweb:/#vserver vweb2 start
> > > > srvweb:/#vserver vweb3 start
> > > >
> > > > All seems to work fine but suddenly the prompt is changing :
vweb3:/#
> > > > whereas i didn't enter into vserver !!! The context-ID are OK in
> > > > /usr/local/var/run/vservers/vwebX.ctx
> > > > but i can't never get out from vweb3 !!! i've seen on the tty1 a
> > message :
> > > > get_ctx_id() and the prompt was changing alone whereas i wasn't
loggued
> > on
> > > > this tty.
> > > >
> > > > Then i enter into vserver vweb3 and i try to leave it with CTRL-D :
it
> > stays
> > > > in vweb3 in the home directory of user with which i connect to the
> > master !
> > > > I can never come back to the master
> > > >
> > > > I think it's a very little bug for you :-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for your great job.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > >
> > > You _are_ using at least util-vserver 0.30.212-rc1, right? That's when
> > > the initial 2.6.19 support was added, and (from what I hear) it works
> > > for most things, but some are broken (e.g. chcontext not creating a
new
> > > UTS namespace).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
> >
