Re: [Vserver] [OPoll] BME inclusion into next stable release
OPINION POLL please check (X) all points which apply ... (according to your opinion) [ ] I had no idea about this issue/deficiency [X] I did already know about it [ ] I'm already using BME (or similar) patches [ ] I will start using BME patches now [X] I do not need/use this 'feature' at all [ ] I think this SHOULD get into the next stable Linux-VServer release because ... [ ] I am using it/want to use it [ ] It's more a bugfix than a feature [ ] I like the idea of ro --bind mounts [X] I think this should NOT be included into the next stable release because ... [ ] it is not thoroughly tested [ ] it is not mature enough [ ] it adds unnecessary code [X] it should better be fixed in the mainline Linux Kernel TIA, Herbert ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] future 2.6 development ...
Answers interleaved. 1) should the 2.4 branch be frozen, and if when? I think you can freeze this as soon as 2.6 becomes stable enough to rely on. Big security holes/crashes could be patched, but not new features. 2) is it bad if 2.4 and 2.6 branches diverge? I do not think so, see above 3) is multitude (2.4/2.6/2.6SE) preferred over development speed? I prefer secure over speed ;-), but I do not see any use in supporting 2 branches for new developments, as the reason why I would stay with an older 'trusted' version is that 'it works and don't want to touch it' 4) is a 2.4/2.6 migration path important to you? Yes. I would prefer to not have to change anything if I want to change to a newer version (assuming the 'new' features are by default off if they could be potentially dangerous or different from the 2.4 branch) 5) what branch 2.4, 2.6 or 2.6SE would you prefer? At this point, 2.4 since I run it, in the future, possibly 2.6 6) what branch/version do you currently use/test? 2.4.24-vs1.22 ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] fedora vserver on a rh9 host not starting
I had the same 'problem' with slackware. Apperantly when no daemons are started in a vserver, it is marked as 'not running'. Just start syslogd or something in the vserver and it should catch on. I did not get it to properly use the startup scripts in the vserver yet. Hm i wonder what vserver-stat would say of the context when it is started without daemons.. Tam - Original Message - From: Arnaud Abelard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:46 AM Subject: [Vserver] fedora vserver on a rh9 host not starting Hello, We've been successfully running rh9 vservers on our rh9 host. We tried to build a fedora core vserver on this host, and surprisingly, we can enter the fc1 vserver, but can't start it: # on the host server (rh9): [EMAIL PROTECTED] vserver]# uname -a Linux vserver.sciences.univ-nantes.fr 2.4.22-ctx17a-smp #2 SMP Wed Aug 27 10:42:10 CEST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] vserver]# vserver fc1-test enter ipv4root is now 1.2.3.4 Host name is now somename.somedomain.com New security context is 29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# ps ax PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1 ?S 0:13 init [3] --init 14894 pts/0S 0:00 /bin/bash -login 14951 pts/0R 0:00 ps ax [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] vserver]# vserver fc1-test start Starting the virtual server fc1-test Server fc1-test is not running ipv4root is now 1.2.3.4 Host name is now somename.somedomain.com New security context is 30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] vserver]# vserver fc1-test status Server fc1-test is not running we are running vservers 0.29, we used both the default fed1.0-minimum and our own minimum install. Any idea? Thanks, -- Arnaud Abélard Administrateur réseaux et systèmes Irin / Faculté des Sciences Université de Nantes ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
