[Vserver] UDP not working
Hi, I'm trying to run bind inside a vserver. Port 53/tcp works perfectly, but the udp equivalent doesn't work. When I do a tcpdump, I see the packets arriving, but no reply from the vserver. I've tried running bind on the host, with the same IP, and it did work (to rule out netfilter misconfigurations). Also adding various capabilities (NET_ADMIN, NET_RAW, ...) doesn't help. The kernel version is 2.6.22.1 (including latest patch + utils). Any idea what the problem might be ? -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Gentoo] baselayout-vserver is dead!
On Friday 03 November 2006 18:00, Benedikt Böhm wrote: Just want to let you know that baselayout-vserver is dead now, since we got baselayout-1.13.0_alpha5 working within vservers. Great work, thanks !! :-) Will that eventually be merged into the main portage tree or will it remain in the vps overlay ? -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] reiserfs user quotas
On Thursday 07 September 2006 02:08, Chuck wrote: On Wednesday 06 September 2006 16:18, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 08:43:16AM -0400, Chuck wrote: we use reiserfs v3 in each guest. each guest is its own partition using lvm to solve guest server total quota is there a way to manage user disk quotas separately within each guest? yes, should work fine with the help of vroot (you need one device per guest) ok will look into this.. im not sure i was completely clear on our setup.. each vserver has its own partition so its controlled by that for the server itself.. You have to use vroot, as Herbert mentioned See this guide for in-detail instructions on how to use quotas in this situation: http://www.5dollarwhitebox.org/wiki/index.php/Howtos_Linux-Vserver_With_LVM_And_Quotas Hope that helps :-) -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Startup Scripts (Related to: sys-apps/baselayout-vserver)
as far as I know, gentoo is the only distro which uses a 'special' init system, which does not work inside a virtual environment (well, without minor tweaks), IMHO that is not a deficiency in gentoo, only a missing (or better incomplete) 'implementation' of the gentoo init style AFAIK the problem with gentoo init scripts is, that some of the scripts depend on other scripts like clock, ntp, net.eth0, etcwhich configure system level things. As that is not possible / allowed inside a regular guest, they will fail, and as such the scripts depending on them as well. That's why you have to use the baselayout-vserver, which includes emtpy scripts for those ones. - init scripts get not only started if they are in a specific runlevel, but also if another script depends on them. so that might be the reason why on gentoo you have to use other init scripts whereas on ubuntu etc, it works out of the box. hmm -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] bind9 in vserver
I'd like to know what is the security problem with CAP_SYS_RESSOURCE ? Herbert said Currently the following Linux Capabilities are considered secure, if you add others to them, you will probably open some security hole. but what is the problem with override resource limits, quota, reserved space on fs, ...? DOS on another vserver using the whole ressources ? what else ? I'm sure some other people on this list can explain that a lot better than I can. The great thing about vserver is besides the stuff you surely know, that it restricts access to the host system a lot. So only basic stuff is allowed. If you need quota...which is safe AFAIK, you have to add that capetc... (and use vroot). The problem with that sys-ressource cap is IIRC that it gives too much access rights to the guest. Which in turn _may_ lead to a host take over ... correct me if I'm wrong.. The bind problem is that with the default installation, it tries to raise its caps on runtime. And that is bad, and by default disabled for a vserver-guest. I run several name servers as guests, and have compiled bind with caps-disabled, and it works great. So either use the dev version of vserver (as suggested) or recompile bind. Hope this helps :-) -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: IPV6 and VSERVER ?
I want to test Bruno's ipv6 patch, but where can I get the latest vserver-2. 1.1 patch for kernel-2.6.16.18? I've get kernel-2.6.16.18 from www.kernel.org, and patch-2.6.16.18-vs2.1.1rc21-ipv6a.diff from http://homepage.internet.lu/brunop/vserver/. But I can't get vs2.1.1 patch for kernel-2.6.16.18. I searched in http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/, but only get patch-2.6.16.17-vs2. 1.1-rc21.diff. Just use patch-2.6.16.17-vs2. 1.1-rc21.diff -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Backupninja and Vservers
Hi Mark, Could anyone elaborate on the use of backupninja with vservers? Haven't tried that one yet. But have a look at: rsnapshot http://www.rsnapshot.org/ and rdiff-backuphttp://www.nongnu.org/rdiff-backup/ Both work very well. -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Logo contest
I prefer these: 3, 20 (should have a capital S) The webpage with all discussed logo's can be found here: http://www.virtualinfrastructure.nl/personal/vserver/index.htm If everybody could reply their preference and remarks to the mailinglist, i can count the replies. Maybe herbert should make the final decision? -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] patch for linux-2.6.14.3
Hi Bertl, Could you please make a patch for linux-2.6.14.3 ? -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] patch for linux-2.6.14.3
*phew* traveled into the past and did a few releases so folks are happy again ... :) Thnx :-) -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] simple disk quota -thoroughly confused
before i continue, i assume that quotas will work on reiserfs ? every system we have is reiser. IIRC is does There are several documents about them for vservers but this one looks like it may be the most current? http://linux-vserver.org/Standard+non-shared+quota That's the most recent one, yes. so in my case since we use udev. i could issue vrsetup /dev/vroot1 /dev/sda4 ? yes what would i replace lvm or evm with? i am using neither.. i simply created one huge volume on sda4 which all the guests use. Then that doc is not for you Think about using lvm, it makes life so much easier :-) so there are a few questions out of all this... arbitrarily choose a vserverx block device? what to use in place of evm or lvm above? then the instruction below.. The doc is only for the case where you have a seperate partition or lv for every guest - - inside the guest run: quotacheck -maugv - umm.. there is no quotacheck program or script inside the guest that i can find... what package is it included in? quota pkg an alternative would be to create a fixed size (maybe 20g or 40g) file mounted via loopback creating a virtual disk for each of the colos as their 'drive'..maybe that would be better? then they could never corrupt anything to do with our main disks... Why don't you use lvm ? Better and faster than loopback -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] simple disk quota -thoroughly confused
thing is with lvm if each guest gets its own logical volume, then why use quotas since that volume can be partitioned as it will anyway no? exactly! :-) no need to do some fancy magiclwm does it for you :-) btw, LV's are resizeable... per user quota may be easily implemented if you want/need to, with lvm. on a shared partition this is currently not possible AFAIK i may be talking out my xxx here since i have not even read about lvm yet. never bothered with it.. think ill read up on it a bit before i say or ask anything more so i dont look like a total stooge :D Check this: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Problem with new utils ?
i'm currently migrating my vservers to the new config-style. the name of the vserver isn't displayed here neither, but i'm able to start stop them _with_ the name (as usual). the vserver prog then says assuming legacy mode i guess you didn't compile your tools with the legacy api enabled... On Monday 06 June 2005 15:05, Benoit des Ligneris wrote: A problem this time, When using the new tools (witvdirh the legacy method), the name of the vservers running on the system is empty and it is not possible to enter/stop/start/... them. vserver-stat display the vservers, processes, etc. however, name is empty too. Has anyone already had this kind of problem ? We are using a 2.6.9-vs1.9.3 kernel which is a bit old but not that much. Because those are productions systems we would like the transition to be as smooth as possible : 1) remove old utils 2) install the new version : util-vserver-0.30.204 3) use it ;-) If some additional steps are necessary, we would like to document/script them and maybe, provide an upgrade path for others. Ben -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Arch] i686
Where do I find the test? I'll run it for x86_64 for you. I'm currently at 2.6.11.7-vs2.0-pre3. I'll run it and then upgrade and run again. hey that would be great! Kernel: 2.6.11.8-vs2.0-pre4 util-vserver: 0.30.207 (linked against glibc) CPU: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 31 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ stepping: 0 cpu MHz : 1005.172 Test-results: Linux-VServer Test [V0.12] (C) 2003-2005 H.Poetzl chcontext is working. chbind is working. Linux 2.6.11.8-vs2.0-pre4 x86_64/0.30.207/0.30.207 [Ea] VCI: 0001:0025 236 0376 --- [000]# succeeded. [001]# succeeded. [011]# succeeded. [031]# succeeded. [101]# succeeded. [102]# succeeded. [201]# succeeded. [202]# succeeded. Hope this helps! -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] error compiling util-vserver on x86_64
Hi Arjen, I'm playing around with vserver on x86_64 too and get the same error as you got. I was wondering if you or someone else found a solution yet? Have you tried the patch (on 13thfloor)? Please let me know if you got a fix. I haven't had time yet to try out the patch. I had only tested with an unpatched dietlibc, which didn't work. -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] error compiling util-vserver on x86_64
On Monday 11 April 2005 00:35, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:05:48AM +0200, Georges Toth wrote: kernel: 2.6.11.6 patch: 1.9.5 util-vserver: 0.30.205 using: dietlibc-0.28 Any idea ? yup .. get a new dietlibc, the right compiler and fixed tools, it should work then ;) i'm using gcc-3.3.5 i'll try that patch.. btw, looks like broken glibc/kernel headers to me ... i doubt that... it's a fresh gentoo install using 2.6 headers, latest stable glibc i don't see what could be broken... the setup is the same as on my non-64 vserver-server. -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Linux-VServer Agenda ...
Hi bertl, sounds great to me, go for it! :-) On Sunday 20 February 2005 02:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote: Hi Community! yesterday evening I had the pleasure to meet with Serguei Beloussov. we had excellent Dinner at the 'Schnitzelwirt' where we talked about - who would have guessed - different virtualization techniques and various commercial and non commercial products in this area ... he clearly pointed out that his company has some interest, that virtualization techniques - like the one linux-vserver uses - 'gain momentum' in the face of system emulators like VMware(tm) and partitioning approaches like Xen. he also told me that they are watching this project very closely and that, while it is small compared to their products, it's quite interesting ... after that we had some fun with Billards (Carambol) and right afterwards I was basically offered a job where I would be able to do some kernel development and get payed for doing so ... let me know what you think! TIA, Herbert ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] XFS on 2.4.28 problem to compile
btw, who else is using XFS with linux-vserver? (just curious) i was, and would love to, if quota (inside vserver, every vserver on a separate partition) would work with xfs. but IIRC, it doesn't. ps: haven't had time yet to test vserver on 2.6, will try to do so in the next days. -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] XFS on 2.4.28 problem to compile
On Sunday 28 November 2004 17:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Georges Toth wrote: btw, who else is using XFS with linux-vserver? (just curious) i was, and would love to, if quota (inside vserver, every vserver on a separate partition) would work with xfs. but IIRC, it doesn't. should work fine .. at least I don't see why it shouldn't ... hmm, ok. i'm wondering then why i formated all the lvm partitions with ext3 :-) -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] kprobes
hi, i saw this on lwn.net: IBM developerWorks [0] shows how to use Kprobes to debug the Linux kernel. The benefits of using Kprobes are many. printk's can be inserted without rebuilding and rebooting the kernel. Processor registers can be logged and even modified for debugging -- without disruption to the system. Similarly, Linux kernel data structures can also be logged and even modified non-disruptively as well. You can even debug race conditions on SMP systems with Kprobes -- and save yourself the trouble of all that rebuilding and rebooting. You'll find kernel debugging is faster and easier than ever. maybe that could be _real_ useful for the vserver project ? :-) [0]: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-kprobes.html?ca=dgr-lnxw04Kprobe -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: kprobes
I've been monitoring the kprobes project for some time now, and it really is interesting, especially as the code required for each arch is very small maybe that could be _real_ useful for the vserver project ? :-) yeah, it probably could, especially for hunting down nasty stuff on a real system ... do you have any specific kernel debugging case in mind here? not directly... i just wanted to let you (and others) know about that project in case you don't already :-). i haven't had time yet to fully check it out, but thought it might be useful for debugging various stuff. (i.e. quota, limitations(cpu, mem), ...) -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] ebuild for alpha util-vserver 0.29.214
hi, could you please make a bugtracker entry on gentoo.org for that ebuild for it to be included in the portage tree ? :-) On Wednesday 28 July 2004 18:44, Luc Dumaine wrote: hi, i hacked an ebuild for util-vserver 0.29.214. i can send it by email to the interested parties, or post it on the list if attachments are tolerated. regards. ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] automated response
euh? what's wrong with the mailinglist? (bunch of weird mails arrived today...) On Monday 26 July 2004 18:11, Don't delete this account wrote: Thankyou for contacting Colourweb Internet, a premier internet solution provider. One of our representatives will contact you shortly. ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Weekly News (001)
hi herbert, - first experimental testing of Vserver Disk Limits for the Linux 2.6 development releases which means using quota (in a VS) in 2.6 could soon be reality, right? if soGREAT :-) - Test Suite for Kernel/Tool testing kool PS: I'd like to get some feedback if this kind of info is appreciated or not ... it absolutely is. thnx! -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Mailing List Future ...
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml) instead of a closed (subscription only) list i don't care i can live with the few spam i get from this list (which doesn't mean i don't think it's annoying though :-) ) 2) do we want martin to maintain and further improve the existing solution yes 3) are we able to tolerate/ignore the unavoidable spam every day/week/month (if it's unavoidable) yes 4) do we want the mailing list to become a medium of communication and cooperation for linux vserver yes -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I wrote some Gentoo specific howto's, not on the installation, but on the administration of vservers. It can be obtained from: http://vserveradmin.intouch.nl/ that link doesn't work for me...? - -- regards, Georges Toth -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtdH08pWPvwUjUA0RAoFaAKCq8oSVSSf/0si3bKcs5nW57HnQagCg5foT m3foUbosupdcwTGslCIhVJg= =8Zy1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Development 1.9.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, so this means that v1.9.0 supports everything the stable release does + much more, but except vroot. is that correct ? On Monday 10 May 2004 18:34, Herbert Poetzl wrote: Hi Community! I'm happy to present the initial Linux 2.6 development version of Linux-VServer aka vs1.9.0. it can be downloaded as all-in-one patch and broken out devel patches (splits) from: http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/d_rel26/v1.9.0/ there are many changes and new features in this release, especially a legacy mode which allows you to use older tools (back to vserver 0.27) to work. nevertheless development tools are required to unleash the full power. a feature overview can be found at: http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=Release+FAQ documentation and examples will follow shortly. please test this version and report any issues (e.g. with the template provided at: http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/BugTemplate-01.txt) enjoy, Herbert ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver - -- regards, Georges Toth -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAn7Dl8pWPvwUjUA0RAiQ0AJ9YGLiOglmUKk2OcQ3zcMQTlgYw7ACg01Mi VndxbkhU59sr1T4idBgcLPE= =Wmu3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] 1.26 includes quota patch?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 do those quota patches work for xfs as well? - -- regards, Georges Toth -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAZzaA8pWPvwUjUA0RAgPnAKDfZPU3s8bIpn8uGP9uTqk1yQlmqwCgkKoO nBifRpvFJuTRXa6V9lrTXDk= =6904 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Context Quota Disk Limits q0.13
Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 15:28 schrieb Herbert Poetzl: if there is demand, a release for the stable branch will follow (just let me know) enjoy, Herbert yes, there is ;-) -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] At the Eve of this Year ...
I too, would like to thank Herbert for his great work and, Enrico and Jack, and all the other people involved in this project. Let's see what next year brings... :-) Have a great new year, and c ya all in 2004, yup :-)!! On Wednesday 31 December 2003 15:27, Herbert Poetzl wrote: Per Aspera Ad Astra! First I would like to thank everyone from the bottom of my heart who contributed to Linux-VServer development. We value every aid we get in striving for our ultimate goal, to provide the best Virtual Private Server solution for free (as in speech and beer ;) The future looks bright, and I'm confident, that the next year will be an interesting one. Well, at least the last quarter of this year was interesting for me ... ;) A Three Month Retrospective (or This Year for Linux-VServer) At the end of September after maintaining and rediffing Vserver patches for over a year, I decided to take over the leadership of Linux-VServer. A month later, Jack had returned and officially handed over project leadership to me, the first 'brand new' Linux-Vserver release was done on the 1st of November. Since then, we had four (4) stable releases, and nine (9) development release, and Linux-Vserver was ported to eleven (11) different architectures, and three non mainline kernels. Last but not least the multitude of 'new' and 'improved' userspace tools and scripts, aiding in vserver creation, maintenance and testing. Maybe Linux-VServer development did happen a little too fast, or maybe the community just wasn't used to this kind of 'rapid evolution', anyway I think it was very beneficial for all who joined and controlled the game. And the Future? First I hope that ALL community members, especially those who are still paralyzed by the high release frequency, may speak up, and let us all know, what direction they would like best, what path we shall take in the future. This doesn't mean that I have no plans for Linux-VServer, this just means, that I would like to collect your ideas and desires to lay a path which suits the community most. Second, I would like to integrate commercially interested groups of the vserver community (the business people ;) more deeply into the development process, and as a start, I would like to form a platform, where hosting providers can deposit, discuss and share their requirements, issues and solutions regarding Linux-VServer in an appropriate way they consider useful. And of course, development, development and development ... I honestly hope, that You enjoyed the journey as much I did, and that you will continue accompany me ... thanks for this year, and good luck for the next, Herbert ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] LTP
Herbert, maybe this could be useful for testing new vserver patches? http://ltp.sourceforge.net/ -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] first stage of Gentoo ebuilds completed
I think, for now, it would be sufficient, to provide and url, where I can download the patches, gentoo uses ontop of the vanilla kernel ... i'm a gentoo person :-) first of all, great work chip !!! i'm using gentoo on all of my servers as well as vservers... :-) herbert, there is no gentoo kernel like there is a i.e. RH-kernel, there are many kernels you can choose of. here's the list of currently available kernels under gentoo: list aa-sources hppa-headers ppc-headers ac-sources hppa-sources ppc-sources alpha-sourceshppa-sources-dev ppc-sources-benh arm-headers ia64-sources ppc-sources-crypto arm-sources ksymoops ppc-sources-dev ck-sources linux-headersredhat-sources compaq-sources mips-headers rsbac-sources development-sources mips-prepatch-sourcesselinux-sources gaming-sources mips-sources sparc-sources genkernelmjc-sources timestamp.x gentoo-dev-sources mm-sources usermode-sources gentoo-sources mosix-sourcesvanilla-prepatch-sources gentoo-test-sources openmosix-sourcesvanilla-sources grsec-sourcespfeifer-sources win4lin-sources gs-sources planet-ccrma-sources wolk-sources hardened-sources ppc-development-sources xfs-sources /list if i understood that correctly, chip wants to make a vanilla+vserver ebuild (package)...? so there are no strange patches already applied by gentoo which cause conflicts or such... -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] first stage of Gentoo ebuilds completed
herbert, there is no gentoo kernel like there is a i.e. RH-kernel, there are many kernels you can choose of. here's the list of currently available kernels under gentoo: hmm, and what is in the gentoo-sources? :-D waht i meant is, there is no single kernel like on suse mandr rh etc there are many including vanilla etc gentoo-sources is the latest considered stable kernel + some patches and fixes etc if i understood that correctly, chip wants to make a vanilla+vserver ebuild (package)...? so there are no strange patches already applied by gentoo which cause conflicts or such... okay, so if I understand that right, it would make sense to have two? vserver-sources kernels, one stable and the other 'experimental' which actually is devel+ all the other nice stuff like quota, disk-limits, memory-limits O(1) scheduler and rmap15k ... right? actually one you create ebuilds for all version of vserver including the experiemental stuff. the devel ebuilds get masked. so people who want to have a stable system install the stable ebuilds, others install the devel ebuilds. (ebuilds are stored in a folder, in the portage tree i.e. vserver-sources) -- regards, Georges Toth ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
