Re: [RE:] Re: [Vserver] Linux Vserver - Feature Question
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0600, Matthew Nuzum wrote: I do think that this would be an interesting feature. http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/ (seems to have updated patches regarding this stuff) http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/token-limiter.README will look into it .. anybody volunteering to test such stuff? TIA, Herbert I think I can create a test case for this. I have a server that is not currently running any vserver stuff that will be ok with a reboot now and then. sounds good, please try to get 1.9.5.5 working there, because it already contains some blkio accounting and it would be very interesting to monitor those values ... (maybe with rrdtools) TIA, Herbert I don't monitor this list that closely these days, so jog me when there's something ready for me to test. -- Matthew Nuzum [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.followers.net - Makers of Elite Content Management System View samples of Elite CMS in action by visiting http://www.followers.net/portfolio/ ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [RE:] Re: [Vserver] Linux Vserver - Feature Question
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm, so you would like to artificially slow down the I/O transfer of a vserver, and make the transaction somewhat longer than necessary? I guess more like not slowing down the host or other vservers. -- Funny quotes: 19. Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of. ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [RE:] Re: [Vserver] Linux Vserver - Feature Question
There is something like this in a patch to UML developed by the Linode folks: http://www.linode.com/forums/archive/o_t/t_790/linode.com_status_update_04_06_04.html Looks like a token bucket, only for IO. It may be easier to do something like this in UML because their IO driver is a constant (UBD) whereas in VServer things aren't so simple since the driver could be anything? Herbert can probably comment on this better :-) I do think that this would be an interesting feature. Grisha On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Bodo Eggert wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm, so you would like to artificially slow down the I/O transfer of a vserver, and make the transaction somewhat longer than necessary? I guess more like not slowing down the host or other vservers. -- Funny quotes: 19. Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of. ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [RE:] Re: [Vserver] Linux Vserver - Feature Question
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:06:46PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: There is something like this in a patch to UML developed by the Linode folks: http://www.linode.com/forums/archive/o_t/t_790/linode.com_status_update_04_06_04.html Looks like a token bucket, only for IO. It may be easier to do something like this in UML because their IO driver is a constant (UBD) whereas in VServer things aren't so simple since the driver could be anything? Herbert can probably comment on this better :-) I do think that this would be an interesting feature. http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/ (seems to have updated patches regarding this stuff) http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/token-limiter.README will look into it .. anybody volunteering to test such stuff? TIA, Herbert Grisha On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Bodo Eggert wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm, so you would like to artificially slow down the I/O transfer of a vserver, and make the transaction somewhat longer than necessary? I guess more like not slowing down the host or other vservers. -- Funny quotes: 19. Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of. ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
RE: [RE:] Re: [Vserver] Linux Vserver - Feature Question
I do think that this would be an interesting feature. http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/ (seems to have updated patches regarding this stuff) http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/token-limiter.README will look into it .. anybody volunteering to test such stuff? TIA, Herbert I think I can create a test case for this. I have a server that is not currently running any vserver stuff that will be ok with a reboot now and then. I don't monitor this list that closely these days, so jog me when there's something ready for me to test. -- Matthew Nuzum [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.followers.net - Makers of Elite Content Management System View samples of Elite CMS in action by visiting http://www.followers.net/portfolio/ ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
