Re: [Vserver] fedora core 4 and ibm 336
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 06:19:37PM +0100, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote: > Bonjour, > > I try to use vserver on an ibm 336 server and fedora core 4. > Ibm 336 does not seem to support 2.6.14 kernel and by extension > 2.6.14 vserver kernel does not seem? why do you conclude that? > Only 2.6.11 boots correctly. > Any solution to find a vserver 2.6.11 rpm kernel ? > a vserver patch to 2.6.11 ? there have been several, but they are outdated by now ... nevertheless if that is your choice http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/OUTDATED/ best, Herbert > thanks in advance. > > > Jean-Marc > > > > > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Fedora Core 4
--- Eric Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:48:52PM -0700, Eric > > Jorgensen wrote: > > > I know this isn't kernel compilation 101, but if > > > someone has already figured out the steps, I'd > > rather > > > not re-invent the wheel. > > > > > > Apparently, since FC4 uses gcc 4, the vanilla > > kernel > > > does not compiled cleanly. I googled, and found > > > patches to 2.6.11, however, I couldn't get them > to > > > complile cleanly. I also suspect that then the > > > vserver patches will not apply correctly. > > > > let me ask the 'stupid' question: why are you > using > > their gcc 4 and not a 3.x version? > > > > AFAIK they still provide the compat-gcc packages > > (even for FC4) and IMHO gcc4 isn't a good choice > > for kernel compiling anyway (including the > patches) > > > > Great idea - I'll give that a whirl. That worked like a charm with 2.6.11.11. I did have to uninstall gcc4 for the kernel, and then reinstall gcc4 and g++ to compile the tools, but it was all quite painless. # sh testme.sh Linux-VServer Test [V0.12] (C) 2003-2005 H.Poetzl chcontext is working. chbind is working. Linux 2.6.11.11-vs2.0-rc4 i686/0.30.207/0.30.207 [Ea] VCI: 0002:0001 273 0316 --- [000]# succeeded. [001]# succeeded. [011]# succeeded. [031]# succeeded. [101]# succeeded. [102]# succeeded. [201]# succeeded. [202]# succeeded. ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Fedora Core 4
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:33:22AM +0200, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Eric Jorgensen wrote: > | So has anyone gone through the work of getting a FC4 > | kernel patched with both the gcc 4 changes as well as > | vserver? Could this kind somebody mind sharing the > | patches with the list? :-) > > http://rpm.hozac.com/tmp/kernel-2.6.12-1.1382_FC4.vs2.0.0.0.rc4.src.rpm > > It seems 2.6.12 has issues with initramfs/initrd though, so it won't boot. hmm ... 2.6.12.1 too? if so, maybe somebody should file a bugreport? best, Herbert > - -- > Daniel Hokka Zakrisson > GPG id: 06723412 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCwfpiYTbdogZyNBIRAnc0AJ4qqK7BUOs9YZSZZJWlMg4UTM1KlwCdGsNf > suTGXCckw7UYxKFVtJOy38U= > =iWsc > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Fedora Core 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Jorgensen wrote: | So has anyone gone through the work of getting a FC4 | kernel patched with both the gcc 4 changes as well as | vserver? Could this kind somebody mind sharing the | patches with the list? :-) http://rpm.hozac.com/tmp/kernel-2.6.12-1.1382_FC4.vs2.0.0.0.rc4.src.rpm It seems 2.6.12 has issues with initramfs/initrd though, so it won't boot. - -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson GPG id: 06723412 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCwfpiYTbdogZyNBIRAnc0AJ4qqK7BUOs9YZSZZJWlMg4UTM1KlwCdGsNf suTGXCckw7UYxKFVtJOy38U= =iWsc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Fedora Core 4
--- Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:48:52PM -0700, Eric > Jorgensen wrote: > > I know this isn't kernel compilation 101, but if > > someone has already figured out the steps, I'd > rather > > not re-invent the wheel. > > > > Apparently, since FC4 uses gcc 4, the vanilla > kernel > > does not compiled cleanly. I googled, and found > > patches to 2.6.11, however, I couldn't get them to > > complile cleanly. I also suspect that then the > > vserver patches will not apply correctly. > > let me ask the 'stupid' question: why are you using > their gcc 4 and not a 3.x version? > > AFAIK they still provide the compat-gcc packages > (even for FC4) and IMHO gcc4 isn't a good choice > for kernel compiling anyway (including the patches) > Great idea - I'll give that a whirl. ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Fedora Core 4
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:48:52PM -0700, Eric Jorgensen wrote: > I know this isn't kernel compilation 101, but if > someone has already figured out the steps, I'd rather > not re-invent the wheel. > > Apparently, since FC4 uses gcc 4, the vanilla kernel > does not compiled cleanly. I googled, and found > patches to 2.6.11, however, I couldn't get them to > complile cleanly. I also suspect that then the > vserver patches will not apply correctly. let me ask the 'stupid' question: why are you using their gcc 4 and not a 3.x version? AFAIK they still provide the compat-gcc packages (even for FC4) and IMHO gcc4 isn't a good choice for kernel compiling anyway (including the patches) > So has anyone gone through the work of getting a FC4 > kernel patched with both the gcc 4 changes as well as > vserver? Could this kind somebody mind sharing the > patches with the list? :-) they should be pretty independant, and linux-vserver should not trigger gcc4 issues ... I hope HTH, Herbert PS: IMHO gcc 4.x is a bad choice for _any_ production system (might change with gcc 4.2 :) > Thanks, > > jorgy > > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Fedora Core 4
On Monday 27 June 2005 22:48, Eric Jorgensen ( EJ )wrote: >I know this isn't kernel compilation 101, but if >someone has already figured out the steps, I'd rather >not re-invent the wheel. > >Apparently, since FC4 uses gcc 4, the vanilla kernel >does not compiled cleanly. I googled, and found >patches to 2.6.11, however, I couldn't get them to >complile cleanly. I also suspect that then the >vserver patches will not apply correctly. Why should they not apply correctly ? The ones for 2.6.12 compiling (with some warnings about deprecated stuff and uninitialized vars) cleanly. Will try the 2.6.11 ones also. But thats just plain vanilla + vserver. Nothing else. >So has anyone gone through the work of getting a FC4 >kernel patched with both the gcc 4 changes as well as >vserver? Could this kind somebody mind sharing the >patches with the list? :-) I'll look into it, once I fought the battle against my desktop ;) (on getting FC4 on it). >Thanks, > >jorgy -- QOTD: "Like this rose, our love will wilt and die." ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
