Re: New iMac

2009-10-22 Thread Martin Hill


On 22/10/2009, at 12:11 PM, Daniel Kerr wrote:
(Side note to Martin. Should I guess you'd be loving one of these to  
replace

your eyeTVMac) ;o) hehe.
All round looks like a nice upgrade I think.


Too right - the home Mac is only a dual-core iMac 24 which takes a  
lot longer to compress videos (using EyeTV in that case) and  
definitely gets bogged down trying to do too many other tasks  
simultaneously, but I think we'll be content with it for the next few  
years at least!


:-)

-Mart


Kind Regards
Daniel


On 22/10/09 12:01 PM, Martin Hill marth...@iinet.net.au wrote:



The Turbo-boost feature of the quad-core Core i5 and i7 chips can  
shut

down unused cores and boost the clock speed of the remaining cores to
much faster clock speeds depending on usage:

The 2.66 GHz Core i5 has a Turbo Boost speed of up to 3.20 GHz
the 2.8 GHz Core i7 can go up to 3.46 GHz in Turbo Boost mode.

At the other end of the spectrum, the Core i7 also supports Hyper-
threading which effectively gives you twice the number of logical
cores for a grand total of 8 cores.  If you need to run lots of apps
at once or you have things like video compression jobs and VMware and
other multi-threaded apps running and want to spread your load over
multiple CPUs, this feature can be very useful.  The Core i5 however
does not support Hyper-threading.

I've found hyper-threading very useful on my 8-core Nehalem Mac Pro  
as

with hyper-threading Mac OS X shows it is running on a 16 core
monster.  I am able to fully max out my 12GBs of RAM running several
video compression jobs (which are each multi-threaded over up to 4
cores each), dual-core Windows XP and a second dual-core VM running
Vista, and a stack of other Mac apps without any slow downs at all.
It is not quite as fast as 16 real cores, but it definitely does
encoding and other multi-threaded tasks faster than 8 maxed-out
physical cores.   (having 4 x 1TB drives hardware RAIDed internally
helps a lot as well so that disk access doesn't become the  
bottleneck).


-Mart

On 22/10/2009, at 9:32 AM, Craig Bruce wrote:



Indeed the 2.66 is a core i5 quad core rather than a core 2 dual  
core

it can also be build with the core i7 as a custom build
--

Craig Bruce
Director

M  0403 040 088
P  08 9367 4691
F  08 9367 4692
E  craig.br...@maxstyle.com.au
W http://www.maxstyle.com.au

Twitter Maxstyle_com_au
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/maxstyle

Disclaimer: The information transmitted on this message is intended
only for the person or organisation to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any
use, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken
in reliance of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this message in error, please contact MaxStyle Pty Ltd
immediately.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the
company.

On 22/10/2009, at 9:17 AM, Daniel Forsdyke wrote:



Hi Adrian

I believe the 'slower' machine has a quad core processor rather
than the dual core on the other one.

Regards
Daniel Forsdyke
--
An Apple iPhone creation

On 22/10/2009, at 9:13, Adrian Skehan adrianske...@mac.com wrote:



Good morning all,

Looking at the latest iMac I notice that the 27-inch: 3.06GHz list
price is $2,199 and the 27-inch: 2.66GHz is $2,599 that is an
extra $300 for a seemingly slower machine.  Have I missed
something or is 2.66GHz quicker than 3.06GHz?



Regards,

Adrian
adrianske...@me.com



-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/ 
guidelines.shtml

Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au




-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au





-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au





-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au



---
Daniel Kerr
MacWizardry

Phone: 0414 795 960
Email: daniel @ macwizardry . com . au
Web:   http://www.macwizardry.com.au


**For everything Macintosh**




-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au





-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - 

Re: New iMac

2009-10-22 Thread Michael Waldie


Hi Martin,

		  I don't know too much about video compression but I do use the  
EyeTV Hybrid a fair bit for recording from a variety of sources and  
then convert them for viewing in Front Row. I tend to export it as the  
size it's captured for the best quality I can get.
Comparing the i5 or i7 to my 24 iMac with a 2.8GHz, there'll be quite  
a noticeable difference?


Cheers

Mike



On 22/10/2009, at 3:40 PM, Martin Hill wrote:


On 22/10/2009, at 12:11 PM, Daniel Kerr wrote:
(Side note to Martin. Should I guess you'd be loving one of these to  
replace

your eyeTVMac) ;o) hehe.
All round looks like a nice upgrade I think.


Too right - the home Mac is only a dual-core iMac 24 which takes a  
lot longer to compress videos (using EyeTV in that case) and  
definitely gets bogged down trying to do too many other tasks  
simultaneously, but I think we'll be content with it for the next few  
years at least!


:-)

-Mart


Kind Regards
Daniel


On 22/10/09 12:01 PM, Martin Hill marth...@iinet.net.au wrote:



The Turbo-boost feature of the quad-core Core i5 and i7 chips can  
shut

down unused cores and boost the clock speed of the remaining cores to
much faster clock speeds depending on usage:

The 2.66 GHz Core i5 has a Turbo Boost speed of up to 3.20 GHz
the 2.8 GHz Core i7 can go up to 3.46 GHz in Turbo Boost mode.

At the other end of the spectrum, the Core i7 also supports Hyper-
threading which effectively gives you twice the number of logical
cores for a grand total of 8 cores.  If you need to run lots of apps
at once or you have things like video compression jobs and VMware and
other multi-threaded apps running and want to spread your load over
multiple CPUs, this feature can be very useful.  The Core i5 however
does not support Hyper-threading.

I've found hyper-threading very useful on my 8-core Nehalem Mac Pro  
as

with hyper-threading Mac OS X shows it is running on a 16 core
monster.  I am able to fully max out my 12GBs of RAM running several
video compression jobs (which are each multi-threaded over up to 4
cores each), dual-core Windows XP and a second dual-core VM running
Vista, and a stack of other Mac apps without any slow downs at all.
It is not quite as fast as 16 real cores, but it definitely does
encoding and other multi-threaded tasks faster than 8 maxed-out
physical cores.   (having 4 x 1TB drives hardware RAIDed internally
helps a lot as well so that disk access doesn't become the  
bottleneck).


-Mart

On 22/10/2009, at 9:32 AM, Craig Bruce wrote:



Indeed the 2.66 is a core i5 quad core rather than a core 2 dual  
core

it can also be build with the core i7 as a custom build
--

Craig Bruce
Director

M  0403 040 088
P  08 9367 4691
F  08 9367 4692
E  craig.br...@maxstyle.com.au
W http://www.maxstyle.com.au

Twitter Maxstyle_com_au
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/maxstyle

Disclaimer: The information transmitted on this message is intended
only for the person or organisation to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any
use, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken
in reliance of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this message in error, please contact MaxStyle Pty Ltd
immediately.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the
company.

On 22/10/2009, at 9:17 AM, Daniel Forsdyke wrote:



Hi Adrian

I believe the 'slower' machine has a quad core processor rather
than the dual core on the other one.

Regards
Daniel Forsdyke
--
An Apple iPhone creation

On 22/10/2009, at 9:13, Adrian Skehan adrianske...@mac.com wrote:



Good morning all,

Looking at the latest iMac I notice that the 27-inch: 3.06GHz list
price is $2,199 and the 27-inch: 2.66GHz is $2,599 that is an
extra $300 for a seemingly slower machine.  Have I missed
something or is 2.66GHz quicker than 3.06GHz?



Regards,

Adrian
adrianske...@me.com



-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/ 
guidelines.shtml

Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au




-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au





-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au





-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au



---
Daniel Kerr

mail

2009-10-22 Thread Martin Sulkowski

I'm getting more and more into trouble to keep my e-mails organised.
Is there a program available that could have a file called customer and when I 
need to send him or a supplier an e-mail related to his job ,that this e-mail 
is automatically in his file.The same for incoming e-mails related to this job.
What are you guys using who use e-mail a lot?Will Bento do the job?
Thanks Martin 
_
View photos of singles in your area Click Here
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/

-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au



RE: prezi

2009-10-22 Thread Martin Sulkowski

Hi Peter
What did you mean with paying  careful attention to bandwidth costs vs 
purchase cost of the full  version.in your reply?Thanks Martin

 Subject: Re: prezi
 From: hinch...@multiline.com.au
 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:00:45 +0800
 To: wamug@wamug.org.au
 
 
 
 On 19/10/2009, at 6:15 PM, gary dorn wrote:
 
 
  my daughter cam home form school  and asked if she could use prezi,  
  as recommended by one of her teachers
  http://prezi.com/
  Coolest online presentation tool I have ever seen
  Techcrunch
  Insanely great
  Harvard Business
  Pretty amazing
  CNET
  Love at first use
  user praise
 
 
  any one got any thoughts/experiences on this.
  chow
  -- 
  gary dorn
  north perth
 
 
 I have no personal experience with this, but given that it' seems to  
 be based on Adobe Air, which works ell on the Mac, has a free version  
 to try which allows you to download your finished presentations, I  
 can't see a downside. It's probably worth a run with the free version  
 for a while before considering upgrading to a paid version, with  
 careful attention to bandwidth costs vs purchase cost of he full  
 version.
 
 
 --
 
 Peter HinchliffeApwin Computer Services
 FileMaker Pro Solutions Developer
 Perth, Western Australia
 Phone (618) 9332 6482Mob 0403 064 948
 
 Mac because I prefer it -- Windows because I have to.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
 Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
 Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
 Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au
 
  
_
Take a peek at other people's pay and perks Check out The Great Australian Pay 
Check
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157639755/direct/01/

-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au



Re: prezi

2009-10-22 Thread Peter Hinchliffe



On 22/10/2009, at 7:55 PM, Martin Sulkowski wrote:


Hi Peter

What did you mean with paying
 careful attention to bandwidth costs vs purchase cost of the full
 version.
in your reply?
Thanks Martin



Only that with the free version everything is done online - all image  
processing, every change to layout, every changed idea, the download  
of the final product (Everything!) is a bit more bandwidth used up -  
so with a large presentation this could conceivably make significant  
inroads into your monthly traffic allowance.


I'm simply saying that it would be useful to run with the free version  
for a while and see how your traffic costs are affected. It could be  
that any increase in costs might make it more worthwhile to use one of  
the paid versions. Only you can make this judgement, bearing in mind  
that we do have a teenager involved with all this:-)


--

Peter HinchliffeApwin Computer Services
FileMaker Pro Solutions Developer
Perth, Western Australia
Phone (618) 9332 6482Mob 0403 064 948

Mac because I prefer it -- Windows because I have to.







-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au



Re: mail

2009-10-22 Thread Neil Houghton
Hi Martin,


In Entourage, I just use ³rules² - I set up folders (and sub-folders where
appropriate) and just set-up rules to file as appropriate ­ eg:

If ³from² is *...@acme.com, move to folder ³acme² (same with ³to²
*...@acme.com)

The mail is filed even before I read it - so at a glance I can see which
unread mail is in an ³important² folder and which can be looked at later.

I¹m sure Mail must have a similar feature/tool to do this.

Cheers


Neil
-- 
Neil R. Houghton
Albany, Western Australia
Tel: +61 8 9841 6063
Email: n...@possumology.com



on 22/10/09 7:51 PM, Martin Sulkowski at martin6...@live.com wrote:

 I'm getting more and more into trouble to keep my e-mails organised.
 
 Is there a program available that could have a file called customer and when I
 need to send him or a supplier an e-mail related to his job ,that this e-mail
 is automatically in his file.The same for incoming e-mails related to this
 job.
 
 What are you guys using who use e-mail a lot?
 Will Bento do the job?
 
 Thanks Martin

 
 Click Here View photos of singles in your area
 http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/
 
 
 
 -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
 Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
 Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
 Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au
 




-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au