http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,2021713,00.html

Radical cleric loses deportation appeal


Staff and agencies
Monday February 26, 2007
Guardian Unlimited 


The Jordanian cleric Abu Qatada. Photograph: Prison service
 


The radical Muslim preacher Abu Qatada today lost his appeal against moves to 
deport him to his native Jordan in what was a landmark legal victory for the 
Home Office. 
The Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) ruled that Qatada faced "no 
real risk of persecution" if he was returned to Jordan, where his lawyers claim 
he could be tortured. 

The 45-year-old preacher - once described as Osama bin Laden's European 
ambassador - will seek leave to appeal the ruling at the court of appeal. 

Human rights lawyer Gareth Peirce said it was a "profoundly important appeal" 
that could have global ramifications. 

Qatada was sentenced in his absence to life imprisonment in Jordan for 
involvement in terrorist attacks dating back to 1998. 

At Siac hearings last May, his legal team said part of the government's case 
against him was based on evidence extracted by torture, and Ms Peirce today 
said he faced the prospect of trial by a military court using evidence obtained 
by torture if he was deported to Jordan. 

Amnesty International also voiced about the Siac decision. 

In its ruling - which has been hailed by the home secretary, John Reid - Siac 
cited safeguards obtained by the UK, principally the controversial "memorandum 
of understanding" (MOU) on not using torture that was signed between Britain 
and Jordan in 2005. 

The ruling has been seen as a first test of the legal robustness of memoranda 
of understanding. The government, which has agreed a number of them with other 
countries, wants to extradite a number of foreign terror suspects. 

Moves towards using MOUs as a key element of anti-terror policy follow a number 
of defeats for the government in the courts over previous attempts to detain 
foreign suspects indefinitely. 

Siac accepted that senior members of the Jordanian General Intelligence 
Directorate (GID) security service had probably "sanctioned or turned a blind 
eye" to torture in the past. 

However, Siac said Jordan's government and the GID would be aware of the risks 
of ill-treating Qatada. 

Critics of MOUs say they are worthless and that extradited terror suspects 
could face death, torture or long prison sentences. 

Speaking of the possibility Qatada could face torture, Ms Peirce said this 
"would be so grotesquely unreconcilable with the concept of justice that it 
would constitute, we say, a complete denial of our responsibilities - to deport 
on that basis with that known prospect". 

However, Tony Blair's official spokesman said the Siac ruling had "recognised 
the value of memorandums of understanding and the assurances linked to them". 

Mr Reid said he welcomed "the decision of the Special Immigration Appeals 
Commission that Abu Qatada presents a threat to our national security and can 
be deported". 

He said he was pleased Siac had backed the MOU process, adding: "It is our firm 
belief that these agreements strike the right balance between allowing us to 
deport individuals who threaten the security of this country and safeguarding 
the rights of these individuals on their return." 

At the Siac hearings in May, Ian Burnett QC, a lawyer for Mr Reid, said it 
would be "extraordinary" if Jordan did not comply with the MOU's diplomatic 
assurances. 

Qatada has always denied being al-Qaida's European ambassador, insisting that 
he had never met Bin Laden. 

He has been held in British prisons for much of the last five years, and had 
been detained in the high security Belmarsh prison for around two years without 
charge until a December 2004 ruling said indefinite detention without trial was 
unlawful. 

After being released on a control order, he was returned to prison in August 
2005 pending deportation. 

Two Algerian terror suspects deported to their homeland last month have been 
arrested, imprisoned and charged with terrorist activities, despite being 
assured by Algerian officials in Britain that they would face no criminal 
proceedings.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke