http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/06/AR2009120602558.html?wpisrc=newsletter
Spy vs. spy on Facebook
By Monica Hesse
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 7, 2009
On Saturday, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency set out to learn how
quickly people could use online social networks to solve a problem of national
scope.
The answer: 8 hours 56 minutes, at least when said problem involves $40,000 and
a bunch of red balloons.
In DARPA's Network Challenge, tied to the 40-year anniversary of the Internet,
the Department of Defense's research arm placed 10 weather balloons in public
places around the country. The first team to locate and submit the balloons'
correct geographic coordinates would get the cash prize. Ready, set, Twitter!
More than 4,000 teams participated. More than a few interesting things were
revealed about the human psyche.
"It's a huge game-theory simulation," says Norman Whitaker of DARPA's
Transformational Convergence Technology Office. The only way to win the hunt
was to find the location of every balloon, but a savvy participant would
withhold his sighting until he'd amassed the other nine locations, or
disseminated false information to throw others off the trail.
Over the weekend, Twitter and Facebook were all abuzz with offers to sell
coordinates for alleged sightings. There was much excitement over the red
balloon in Providence, R.I. There was no red balloon in Providence -- just a
Photoshopped decoy circulated by a conniving player.
The winning team was spearheaded by Riley Crane, a postdoctoral research fellow
at MIT's Media Lab. MIT's team set up an elaborate information-gathering
pyramid. Each balloon was allotted $4,000. The first person to spot one would
be awarded $2,000, while the people who referred them to the team would get
smaller amounts based on where they fell on the info chain. Any leftover money,
after payment to spotters and their friends, will be donated to charity.
Crane says that the team's decision to spread the wealth was instrumental to
its success, as it gave people an incentive to share good information, and a
feeling of investment in the process. He was less interested in the monetary
prize than in the potential for social research.
"On the science side, we're scratching the surface of this tremendous new
system" of social networks. "With this data set we have the potential to
understand how to face -- and exploit -- the challenges that come with living
in this interconnected world."
The practical possibilities of the Network Challenge go far beyond a research
lab. Already the powers of social networks are well documented: Earlier this
year, information about violence in Iran continued to be dispersed through
Twitter even after traditional news sources were squelched. Crane wonders what
types of applications might result from data about information dispersal
collected this weekend: "Could we design an alert system to help us find
missing children? Could we redesign the incentive structure for police
rewards?"
DARPA officials plan to meet with participants throughout the week to debrief
them on their strategies.
Not everyone believes their motives are pure. After all, what would an
intersection between the government and the Internet be without a few
conspiracy theories?
"Looks to me that 'someone' has lost a balloon with something very important in
it, and now is making all this fiction to promote it's prompt finding," wrote a
commenter on NewScientist.com.
Care to comment, Dr. Whitaker?
"That," he says, sounding like he is trying to keep a straight face, "is an
amazing story."
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
