Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.2 branch
Freddie Witherden wrote: Hi all, On 31 Jan 2009, at 09:05, Dennis Schridde wrote: Nope, not much holding back 2.2. I would like to see the new lobby protocol which Gerard was working on make it into 2.2. Will simplify things in the future. I did slightly more work on it, and was not satisfied with the end result. It just didn't feel right (oooh). I think we should completely rewrite the joining/hosting code. Also, JSON is quite OK, but a way to send lua objects safely would be even better. We would have one dependency (+one interface) less. - Gerard ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.2 branch
Hi, On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:55:49 +0100, Gerard Krol g.c.k...@student.tudelft.nl wrote: I did slightly more work on it, and was not satisfied with the end result. It just didn't feel right (oooh). I think we should completely rewrite the joining/hosting code. Also, JSON is quite OK, but a way to send lua objects safely would be even better. We would have one dependency (+one interface) less. Lua is fine with me -- so long as it is not too hard to parse on the Python (server) side of things. The one advantage that JSON did have was that it was possible to write an HTTP interface for the lobby server (using JSON) allowing for web-based clients. Therefore a better way might be to get a Lua script for serialising Lua objects as JSON. That way we get maximum compatibility with minimum effort. Regards, Freddie. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.2 branch
2009/2/19 Freddie Witherden fred...@witherden.org: Lua is fine with me -- so long as it is not too hard to parse on the Python (server) side of things. The one advantage that JSON did have was that it was possible to write an HTTP interface for the lobby server (using JSON) allowing for web-based clients. Therefore a better way might be to get a Lua script for serialising Lua objects as JSON. That way we get maximum compatibility with minimum effort. This is a good idea. I'd also like to see an HTML interface for checking on the lobby server. Heck, I'd write it myself. - Zarel ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.2 branch
Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2009 07:50:10 schrieb bugs buggy: On 1/5/09, Per Inge Mathisen per.mathi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:54 PM, bugs buggy buginato...@gmail.com wrote: I was just curious, since the release of 2.1, what is the plan for the next version? I was thinking that 2.2 should be branched from trunk, and then we could pretty much make a release from that ASAP. I am pretty much thinking the same thing. I don't think I have seen responses on this subject from the other members. Is there anything holding back a 2.2 branch, besides the time factor? Or should we make a package from current trunk, package the FMVs with it, and release it for a pre-alpha candidate (without branching) to see what, if anything needs to be done? That way, we will get a better idea if we should branch 2.2 now, or wait a bit longer. What say you all? Nope, not much holding back 2.2. I would like to finish my raycasting before, but I can also release it in half-finished state. In that case I would like to get a timeframe / date for feature freeze, so I could plan better. --DevUrandom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.2 branch
Hi all, On 31 Jan 2009, at 09:05, Dennis Schridde wrote: Nope, not much holding back 2.2. I would like to see the new lobby protocol which Gerard was working on make it into 2.2. Will simplify things in the future. Other than that, the sooner we branch, the better! Regards, Freddie. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.2 branch
On 1/5/09, Per Inge Mathisen per.mathi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:54 PM, bugs buggy buginato...@gmail.com wrote: I was just curious, since the release of 2.1, what is the plan for the next version? I was thinking that 2.2 should be branched from trunk, and then we could pretty much make a release from that ASAP. I am pretty much thinking the same thing. I don't think I have seen responses on this subject from the other members. Is there anything holding back a 2.2 branch, besides the time factor? Or should we make a package from current trunk, package the FMVs with it, and release it for a pre-alpha candidate (without branching) to see what, if anything needs to be done? That way, we will get a better idea if we should branch 2.2 now, or wait a bit longer. What say you all? ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
