Re: [wtr-general] Re: Upgrading anxiety

2011-12-31 Thread Jari Bakken
It's still useful for people using 1.X. Perhaps create a new
comparison page for 2.X?

Den 31. des. 2011 kl. 10:18 skrev Jarmo Pertman :

> On Dec 30, 10:54 am, Željko Filipin 
> wrote:
>> https://github.com/jarib/watir-webdriver/wiki/Comparison-with-Watir-1.X
>
> This list is not up to date anymore - should we just delete the
> statements which aren't true anymore so it would reflect the actual
> state? This list seems to be true when compared with Watir 1.x, but
> not with 2.x.
>
>
> Jarmo Pertman
> -
> IT does really matter - http://itreallymatters.net
>
> --
> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
> you ask, be nice.
>
> watir-general@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com


Re: [wtr-general] Upgrading anxiety

2011-12-31 Thread Željko Filipin
On Saturday, December 31, 2011, Jarmo Pertman  wrote:
> This list is not up to date anymore - should we just delete the
> statements which aren't true anymore so it would reflect the actual
> state?

I think anybody can edit wiki pages at github, and I think you have the
most knowledge about what needs to be fixed there.

Željko

-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com


[wtr-general] Re: Upgrading anxiety

2011-12-31 Thread Jarmo Pertman
On Dec 30, 10:54 am, Željko Filipin 
wrote:
> https://github.com/jarib/watir-webdriver/wiki/Comparison-with-Watir-1.X

This list is not up to date anymore - should we just delete the
statements which aren't true anymore so it would reflect the actual
state? This list seems to be true when compared with Watir 1.x, but
not with 2.x.


Jarmo Pertman
-
IT does really matter - http://itreallymatters.net

-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com


[wtr-general] Re: Upgrading anxiety

2011-12-31 Thread Jarmo Pertman
On Dec 30, 2:57 am, Chuck van der Linden  wrote:
> c) Replace:  browser.text_contains  with  browser.text.include?
> d) Replace:  text_field.verify_contains("dfadf")  with
> text_field.text.include?("dfadf')

This is not enough, because it returns only false/true. You should
still assert that with the testing framework like RSpec or Test::Unit:
assert text_field.text.include?(...)
text_field.text.should include(...)


> Watir: browser.close  => WW: browser.window.close

WW also has browser.close


Jarmo Pertman
-
IT does really matter - http://itreallymatters.net

-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com