[Wayland-bugs] [Bug 84014] Pointer locking protocol

2018-06-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84014
Bug 84014 depends on bug 85715, which changed state.

Bug 85715 Summary: wl_fixed is not precise enough for high dpi mice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85715

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |MOVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
wayland-bugs mailing list
wayland-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs


[Wayland-bugs] [Bug 84014] Pointer locking protocol

2018-06-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84014

Daniel Stone  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Daniel Stone  ---
At this point we can probably close it ... :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
wayland-bugs mailing list
wayland-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs


[Wayland-bugs] [Bug 84014] Pointer locking protocol

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84014

--- Comment #3 from Jonas Ådahl  ---
An unstable protocol (pointer constraints) was released as part of
wayland-protocols 1.1. Weston 1.12 includes support. I'll leave this one open
until there is a stable protocol added.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
wayland-bugs mailing list
wayland-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs


[Wayland-bugs] [Bug 84014] Pointer locking protocol

2014-11-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84014

Pekka Paalanen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||85715

--- Comment #2 from Pekka Paalanen  ---
I'm adding a depends-on to bug 85715 because that report raises an interesting
question: with high-resolution, high-rate mice, can we still use wl_fixed_t for
the relative motion events, or can it be too imprecise leading slow motion to
be rounded to zero?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
wayland-bugs mailing list
wayland-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs


[Wayland-bugs] [Bug 84014] Pointer locking protocol

2014-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84014

Jonas Ådahl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||84644

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
wayland-bugs mailing list
wayland-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs


[Wayland-bugs] [Bug 84014] Pointer locking protocol

2014-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84014

--- Comment #1 from Jonas Ådahl  ---
A follow up to the previous RFC posted here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2014-September/017318.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Wayland-bugs mailing list
Wayland-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs