[web2py] Re: Static file caching problem?
I examined the TCP traffic with Wireshark and could not see the actual requests go out to the server. I am beginning to believe this is a Firebug instrumentation problem. I would believe the Wireshark trace, it had no filters and I removed as much traffic as possible on the interface and all I got was a GET to the controller for the page. Sorry for the noise. Ron
Re: [web2py] Re: Static file caching problem?
did you try with http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com ? 2011/5/19 ron_m ron.mco...@gmail.com I examined the TCP traffic with Wireshark and could not see the actual requests go out to the server. I am beginning to believe this is a Firebug instrumentation problem. I would believe the Wireshark trace, it had no filters and I removed as much traffic as possible on the interface and all I got was a GET to the controller for the page. Sorry for the noise. Ron -- http://martin.tecnodoc.com.ar
Re: [web2py] Re: Static file caching problem?
Martin, Thanks for the suggestion, the analyze function shows 200 for the status but that it loaded from cache which is consistent with observation using Wireshark. This tool is also a much more direct approach to increasing performance. It also pointed out that the items getting the 200 do not have an expires setting. Now I see why the browser would reload a JPG an hour later that has not changed in months. Ron
