[web2py] Re: Suggestion to add more mod_wsgi info to help new users -- WSGIPassAuthorization for instance
Great! Thanks Massimo. I'm sure that will save some others some time!
[web2py] Re: Suggestion to add more mod_wsgi info to help new users -- WSGIPassAuthorization for instance
Thank you. I updated setup-web2py-ubuntu.sh and setup-web2py-fedora.sh On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 20:47:34 UTC-5, Larry Weinberg wrote: > > In order to have the web2py examples work out of the box on Apache with > mod_wsgi, an extra directive is needed in the Apache configuration for the > VirtualHost (or directory, or .htaccess) > > WSGIPassAuthorization On > > This allows basic authentication to proceed through. > > It looks like there are some good reasons why mod_wsgi in apache strips > authorization by default: > The link to the info is: > http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationDirectives#WSGIPassAuthorization > > > > > >
[web2py] Re: Suggestion to add more mod_wsgi info to help new users -- WSGIPassAuthorization for instance
In order to have the web2py examples work out of the box on Apache with mod_wsgi, an extra directive is needed in the Apache configuration for the VirtualHost WSGIPassAuthorization On This allows basic authentication to proceed through. It looks like there are some good reasons why mod_wsgi in apache strips authorization by default: The link to the info is: http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationDirectives#WSGIPassAuthorization
[web2py] Re: Suggestion to add more mod_wsgi info to help new users -- WSGIPassAuthorization for instance
Please. Tell us more. On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 16:41:39 UTC-5, Larry Weinberg wrote: > > I'm a newbie to apache configuration, so I just spent hours trying to > determine why none of the REST-api-with-authentication web2py examples > were working for me. All worked fine without authentication. > > It turns out the apache server with mod_wsgi strips the authorization out > by default. > A one line sentence about this in the web2py manual would have left me > with more hair! > > Thanks for listening. >