Re: [web2py] Re: GSOC who is in charge and how should we proceed?
On 02/20/2011 12:25 PM, Tim Michelsen wrote: I am very excited for GSOC as I was an achiever back in 2009. It changed my career forever. http://www.google-melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2011/timeline We need get our applications in very soon so let's get cracking! Who is in charge of this and how can I help? Shall we collect Ideas on the google code wiki and then vote? Do we have a wiki for this somewhere? I think we could just gather then here on the list then make a page ready for the proposal that documents do idea. (If I remember it is a plus to have when applying.) BR, Jason
Re: [web2py] Re: GSOC who is in charge and how should we proceed?
On 02/20/2011 06:04 PM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: I cannot work on this for another week. After that I am all for it and I will send my comments about the proposed goals. Some are interesting. I do not think voting is a good idea since feasibility is also important. I totally agree. A team of core developers and those familiar with web2py framework should make the choices on this one. BR, Jason I would like to add one option. Build a social and modular web2py Learning Management System that runs on GAE. Some of the other projects that have been proposed could be components of the LMS and also work independently. Massimo On Feb 20, 4:25 am, Tim Michelsen wrote: I am very excited for GSOC as I was an achiever back in 2009. It changed my career forever. http://www.google-melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2... We need get our applications in very soon so let's get cracking! Who is in charge of this and how can I help? Shall we collect Ideas on the google code wiki and then vote?
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
How about setting up some real solid documentation with Sphinx? It is low hanging fruit, but I think getting some good documentation set up would help the web2py community directly. I don't know the current testing coverage percentages now, but getting those to 90%-100% might be another good one. Cheers, James Hancock On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:39 AM, pbreit wrote: > InstantPress is nice but the UI is a little too fancy for me. No reason to > re-invent the wheel here.
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
I'd love to see 1) WordPress copy and 2) Vbulletin/FluxBB/etc copy. No fancy UIs. Keep it simple.
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
A component library rooted on LOAD. Pages would be made by components sibiling or nested. MVC pattern applied then not to the page but component oriented. 2011/2/17 Anthony : > Maybe get started on some of these ideas: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/web2py-developers/55_7Kr3jDjI/0008xQ036uYJ (either > as a separate framework, or preferably, somehow integrated into web2py, > maybe as an alternative development model). > > Other ideas: > > Full-text search (maybe an abstraction layer with pluggable search backends, > like http://haystacksearch.org/, http://code.google.com/p/django-fts/) > Integrated Comet and WebSockets support > (http://seventhings.liftweb.net/comet, > http://zotonic.com/page/625/websockets-comet) > Integrated unit, functional, and performance/load testing > (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/funkload, > http://code.google.com/p/multi-mechanize/) > Expanded NoSQL support. > > Anthony > On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:03:40 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> We need proposals. What do we want to be done? >> >> On Feb 16, 2:57 pm, Tim Michelsen wrote: >> > Hello, >> > is web2py considering to mentor for this year? >> > >> > http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/soc/ >> > >> > Regards, >> > Timmie
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
New CRUD or SQLFORM API that decoupled "one form and one table" model of functioning more easily in many differents scenarios... For "many to many" relation for example it is rare that you want to add only one relation at a time. When 2 tables are related many to many there should be a CRUD automatically generated form that respond to 90% of the needs... Or that you can configure the CRUD API to make it works differently under different use case... Subform with normalized schema so you can add any number of input on the fly that will be store in the "subtable" into a one to many relation with the base form table. Improve plain text search Richard On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Albert Abril wrote: > A CMS based on the zotonic[1] (for example) interface. > Or just a killer CMS > > instantpress could be a good base. > > [1] http://zotonic.com/gallery/735/screen-shot-gallery > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Thadeus Burgess wrote: > >> statistics engine = statlib >> -- >> Thadeus >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Jason Brower wrote: >> >>> Local editor integration and permenent admin settings for that and >>> other features. >>> >>> - Original message - >>> > We need proposals. What do we want to be done? >>> > >>> > On Feb 16, 2:57 pm, Tim Michelsen wrote: >>> >>> > > Hello, >>> > > is web2py considering to mentor for this year? >>> > > >>> > > http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/soc/ >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > Timmie >>> >>> >> >
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
A CMS based on the zotonic[1] (for example) interface. Or just a killer CMS instantpress could be a good base. [1] http://zotonic.com/gallery/735/screen-shot-gallery On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Thadeus Burgess wrote: > statistics engine = statlib > -- > Thadeus > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Jason Brower wrote: > >> Local editor integration and permenent admin settings for that and other >> features. >> >> - Original message - >> > We need proposals. What do we want to be done? >> > >> > On Feb 16, 2:57 pm, Tim Michelsen wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > is web2py considering to mentor for this year? >> > > >> > > http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/soc/ >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Timmie >> >> >
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
statistics engine = statlib -- Thadeus On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Jason Brower wrote: > Local editor integration and permenent admin settings for that and other > features. > > - Original message - > > We need proposals. What do we want to be done? > > > > On Feb 16, 2:57 pm, Tim Michelsen wrote: > > > Hello, > > > is web2py considering to mentor for this year? > > > > > > http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/soc/ > > > > > > Regards, > > > Timmie > >
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
Local editor integration and permenent admin settings for that and other features. - Original message - > We need proposals. What do we want to be done? > > On Feb 16, 2:57 pm, Tim Michelsen wrote: > > Hello, > > is web2py considering to mentor for this year? > > > > http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/soc/ > > > > Regards, > > Timmie
Re: [web2py] Re: GSoC
Some ideas: Mangodb support Improved wizard tool Improved plugin_wiki statistics engine - Original message - > We need proposals. What do we want to be done? > > On Feb 16, 2:57 pm, Tim Michelsen wrote: > > Hello, > > is web2py considering to mentor for this year? > > > > http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/soc/ > > > > Regards, > > Timmie
