Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-10 Thread Anthony
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 11:13:02 PM UTC-5, mikech wrote:

 +1 for this.  I wasn't thinking about major edits, but we could see 
 whether the typos etc. had already been reported and not
 crowd the group with repeats.


The online book is temporarily locked, but normally when a minor typo is 
reported, it gets correct right away, so unlikely someone else will later 
see and report the same typo. 


Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-10 Thread mikech
So can we assume that the typos we see there now, have not been reported?

Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-09 Thread Anthony
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 1:58:56 AM UTC-5, viniciusban wrote:

 I think only texts are sufficient.

 We can send patches to Massimo (or somebody else) merge them in.

Without the book app, it's very difficult to see how your edits will look. 
Not a big deal for minor edits, but difficult for more substantial editing 
like adding new sections or re-organizing content.

Anthony



Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-09 Thread mikech
+1 for this.  I wasn't thinking about major edits, but we could see whether 
the typos etc. had already been reported and not
crowd the group with repeats.



Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-08 Thread Ismael Serratos
another :p

and it is used internally by the *SQLFORM.gird *and SQLFORM.smartgrid.

Should be SQLFORM.grid instead of SQLFORM.gird

in http://web2py.com/book/default/chapter/06#smart_query-%28experimental%29

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Anthony abasta...@gmail.com wrote:

 FYI, I am not specifically looking for typos, but I am adding a bunch of
 material to the book and reviewing most of the newer material, so I'm
 catching a lot of typos and errors as well. So, as Andrew says, most of the
 typos and formatting issues will likely be resolved by the next release.

 Anthony


 On Monday, November 7, 2011 5:54:37 PM UTC-5, Andrew wrote:

 I'm going through the book in detail looking for typos, and trying to
 absorb some more learnings at the same time.  By all means go ahead,
 but we may be doubling up in effort.  May I suggest waiting for a
 cleaned up Version 3.3 ?  I hope it will only contain one or two
 missed typos that may need many eyes to find.

 Regards
 Andrew

 P.S.  You did find one in a chapter that I had already reviewed :)


 On Nov 8, 10:44 am, mikech mp.c...@gmail.com wrote:
  Ok I'm reading thru that chapter, and forward.  So I'll report what I
 find.




Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-08 Thread Vinicius Assef
Massimo,
what about putting the book text in a dvcs? (git, hg, etc.)

Wouldn't it simplify updates?

--
Vinicius Assef.


On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Massimo Di Pierro
massimo.dipie...@gmail.com wrote:
 No but email me.
 On Nov 8, 2011, at 6:54 PM, mikech wrote:

 I was wondering if there was any 'bug' tracking in relation to the
 documentation.  It might be a good idea to track the corrections, and
 changes.




Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-08 Thread Anthony
On Tuesday, November 8, 2011 11:26:44 PM UTC-5, viniciusban wrote:

 Massimo,
 what about putting the book text in a dvcs? (git, hg, etc.)

 Wouldn't it simplify updates?

Should include the whole book app -- otherwise it would be difficult to see 
the results of edits made on your local machine.



Re: [web2py] Re: Online Book Typo

2011-11-08 Thread Vinicius Assef
I think only texts are sufficient.

We can send patches to Massimo (or somebody else) merge them in.

--
Vinicius Assef.


On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Anthony abasta...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tuesday, November 8, 2011 11:26:44 PM UTC-5, viniciusban wrote:

 Massimo,
 what about putting the book text in a dvcs? (git, hg, etc.)

 Wouldn't it simplify updates?

 Should include the whole book app -- otherwise it would be difficult to see
 the results of edits made on your local machine.