Re: [web2py] gae RFC

[Marco Mansilla]

El Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Massimo Di Pierro  escribió:

> I have isolated a minimal set of GAE SDK files that, if shipped with
> web2py, would allow to test locally and deploy on GAE from web2py
> admin without need to download the SDK separately (basically I deleted
> Django and WebObj since they are not necessary). Their license would
> allow it.
> 
> This would make web2py source 7MB bigger. It would probably go in
> gluon/contrib.
> 
> Is it a good idea? Pros? Cons?
> 
> Massimo
> 

Seems to be a really good idea, specially to me... i have a really ugly
relationship with GAE on deployment, so... go for it!.

Pros: Easy deployment on GAE (and this is a huge PRO!)

Cons: Bigger source to download, so would it be possible to have a
regular version and a GAE SDK included version?, is it too much to
ask?, some people will not use this feature, still don't think is
important, 7MB is not that much.

Re: [web2py] gae RFC

[Martín Mulone]

+1. No prblem with the seven MB increase :). How about updates?, or you have
to make all the work again when new gae sdk.

2011/3/16 Massimo Di Pierro 

> I have isolated a minimal set of GAE SDK files that, if shipped with
> web2py, would allow to test locally and deploy on GAE from web2py
> admin without need to download the SDK separately (basically I deleted
> Django and WebObj since they are not necessary). Their license would
> allow it.
>
> This would make web2py source 7MB bigger. It would probably go in
> gluon/contrib.
>
> Is it a good idea? Pros? Cons?
>
> Massimo
>
>


-- 
Pablo Martín Mulone (mar...@tecnodoc.com.ar)
http://www.tecnodoc.com.ar/

My blog: http://martin.tecnodoc.com.ar
Expert4Solution Profile:
http://www.experts4solutions.com/e4s/default/expert/6

Re: [web2py] gae RFC

[contatogilson...@gmail.com]

Nice idea.
_
*Gilson Filho*
*Web Developer
http://gilsondev.com*