Re: embedded frameworks + split install
Moin Peter, sorry for the delay. Am 16.11.2006 um 01:14 schrieb Peter Vandoros: Ulrich Köster wrote: Am 15.11.2006 um 01:38 schrieb Peter Vandoros: Hi Mike, Doesn't this mean that you will no longer be able to use any of the WebServerResources from within standard WO frameworks such as JavaWOExtensions? No. Then how would you use a resource in the JavaWOExtensions framework? What will the url look like? Won't it look something like WebObjects/Frameworks/JavaWOExtensions.framework/ WebServerResources/some_image.jpg As before no need to change you code or components. What i have been doing to overcome this situation is to create a virtual directory/symbolic link in the default /WebObjects/ Frameworks directory that points to the framework that has WebServerResources. Eg. /WebObjects/Frameworks/my_framework.framework where my_framework.framework points to /WebObjects/Applications/ YourApp.woa/Contents/Frameworks/my_framework.framework. This obviously means an extra step in deploying new versions of the same framework on the same server. It does also mean that if you have only one valid version of the framework on the server then you only need to perform this step at time of configuring the server. The problem is that we're not deploying versions. It's just a bunch of files moved to the server. I'm not sure what you mean? Don't you need web access to particular versions of the Ajax framework? For sure. Exactly the one that I've used to test the app. Uli Peter ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ulrich% 40assense.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
Re: Performance on new xserves ?
Thanks Asa! Have you had any experience of 1.4 vs 1.5 JVM on G5's ? I'm wrestling with whether or not to change to 1.5, and performance improvements would certainly be a good reason. On Nov 30, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Asa Hardcastle wrote: We ordered two xserves today also, so we'll probably have some stats soon also, although we won't have anything to compare fairly to until next year. As for the xeons, we've been developing on Mac Pros since early September, they are ridiculously fast. We've found that 1.5 far exceeds 1.4 in performance, especially with the Wonder AJAX frameworks. And we've seen the boost from Java 1.5 across the board on fast and slow machines. As a disclaimer -- we have not done extensive testing (any testing in fact) to understand the performance boosts we're seeing. later, asa On Nov 30, 2006, at 8:59 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: Has anyone had the opportunity to try WebObjects out on the new Xeon xserves? If so, what was performance like, and what JVM were you using? I'm still a little confused about how/when 64 bit will be / is available for Java... Well, we ordered ours today, so I guess we can do some stats before New Year Eve. I just got an iMac Core Duo 17, it's damn fast (it take 35 seconds to build Wonder's frameworks). ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/a.talk% 40zenn.net This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
Re: Performance on new xserves ?
No experience on G5s. But on G4s it _seemed_ to make a big difference. asa On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Ken Anderson wrote: Thanks Asa! Have you had any experience of 1.4 vs 1.5 JVM on G5's ? I'm wrestling with whether or not to change to 1.5, and performance improvements would certainly be a good reason. On Nov 30, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Asa Hardcastle wrote: We ordered two xserves today also, so we'll probably have some stats soon also, although we won't have anything to compare fairly to until next year. As for the xeons, we've been developing on Mac Pros since early September, they are ridiculously fast. We've found that 1.5 far exceeds 1.4 in performance, especially with the Wonder AJAX frameworks. And we've seen the boost from Java 1.5 across the board on fast and slow machines. As a disclaimer -- we have not done extensive testing (any testing in fact) to understand the performance boosts we're seeing. later, asa On Nov 30, 2006, at 8:59 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: Has anyone had the opportunity to try WebObjects out on the new Xeon xserves? If so, what was performance like, and what JVM were you using? I'm still a little confused about how/when 64 bit will be / is available for Java... Well, we ordered ours today, so I guess we can do some stats before New Year Eve. I just got an iMac Core Duo 17, it's damn fast (it take 35 seconds to build Wonder's frameworks). ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/a.talk% 40zenn.net This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
Problem with Subversion and Xcode line encodings
I have been having a very strange problem with Subversion and Xcode. I am trying to convert from CVS to SVN but when I commit a file that I have edited in Xcode i get ~/trunk/Core/src/ticoon $ svn commit crypto Adding crypto Adding crypto/HexTool.java Transmitting file data .svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Unrecognized line ending style svn: Your commit message was left in a temporary file: svn:'/Users/daspinall/trunk/Core/src/ticoon/svn-commit.tmp' The repository is a linux (Debian) server. The cvs2svn worked fine. I can edit and commit to this repo, but if I add a new file it fails. If I query the properties ticoon $ svn proplist -v crypto/HexTool.java Properties on 'crypto/HexTool.java': svn:executable : * svn:eol-style : native svn:keywords=Date Author Id Revision ticoon $ I have tried setting the svn:eol-style to CR, LF, I have tried changing the line encoding in XCode, all to no success. Please don't say _use eclipse_, I am looking at that also, but the developers have projects and comfort levels with XCode, so I think a migration for both CVS and XCode at once is too much. Subversion is the same on both the Macs and the Linux server $ svn --version svn, version 1.4.2 (r22196) XCode is version 2.4 I don't know what else could be the problem. Help? David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (416) 513-9524 x263 Ticoon Technology Inc. 56 The Esplanade, Suite 404, Toronto, ON, M5E 1A7 ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
