Re: setUser() vs. setUserRelationship()
This is just off the top of my head, but you _can_ model the toManyThousands relationship, just don't make it a class property. Then in the EOGenerator template you could get all the toMany relationships that are not class properties and generate the code to use ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship for those. But that assumes that all non-class-property toMany relationships should be handled this way... Dave On Aug 9, 2011, at 5:32 AM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote: Yep, modeling an unmodeled relationship… sounds contradictory. I guess in my dream it was really modeled but generated different accessors during EOGenerate. :-) On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote: Yes, you're right. :-) I found ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship in your presentation but nowhere you said it was part of entity modeler. :-) On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: Ricardo, No, you were dreaming. :-) Regards, Kieran. (Sent from my iPhone) On Aug 4, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Ricardo J. Parada rpar...@mac.com wrote: I thought there was something about this in one of the sessions in this WOWODC 2011 but I can't recall. Something about selecting ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship in the entity modeler but I don't see it. Is there such as thing in entity modeler? Thanks, Ricardo On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote: Ok, I haven't even looked yet -- so excuse if I'm off base -- But shouldn't this be a part of the eo-templates? Just about every model has this potential problem, so is there a reason we can't check off a box in the modeler to suggest this is a unmodeled to-many or something and generate the methods? Not that making the method is hard or anything, more that it seems like a solid standard practice that should be elevated in visibility? On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: It's easy, ….. (1) Copy and paste the example from that er.extensions.eof.ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship class javadoc into BBEdit (2) Do some find/replace editing (3) Paste the result into your entity class that needs to have the unmodeled toMany relationship. (4) Delete the model toMany relationship in the relationships pane in the EOModel. Test, and you are done. I have thought about having some user-info entry in the model entity that could be used to auto generate this boiler-plate code in the eogen superclass, but it just has not been a priority for me. Regards, Kieran On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote: On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: On a related note, with regards tens of millions on one side of a to-many …. that will kill your performance on saving a change to that relationship unless you make the relationship a one-sided relationship. @see er.extensions.eof.ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationshipS, D for one solution to that situation. I recommend using an unmodeled toMany for any relationship where the toMany can be in the thousands. YMMV. this is of interest to me -- any docs or just code to read on this subject? ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rparada%40mac.com This email sent to rpar...@mac.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rparada%40mac.com This email sent to rpar...@mac.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Expired sessions and relative image links
Hi Tim, I am not really clear on what you are doing and what the problem is. This code should only affect URLs that get sent into your application. Which should be none. Why do you have relative URLs to resources? Have you looked at the BASE tag, http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_base.asp? That maybe a better solution to your problem. What's been causing this for me are requests for Ajax/WebServerResources/ibox/images/bg.png when using AMD. I don't see why that should be. Are you using a custom CSS file with the AMD? Is the relative URL in there? That will only work with Wonder, and only if the image path is relative to the location of the CSS file in your project. Chuck On 2011-08-05, at 12:51 PM, Timothy Worman wrote: On Aug 5, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: On 2011-08-05, at 11:45 AM, Tim Worman wrote: I'm seeing this now and it's been driving me exactly bat-sh!t crazy. In all the threads I've read on this topic the only thing I haven't found is WHY it happens. Why do any of the transactions on my pages believe that image files are sessions ids? Anybody……….? Bueller………? The transactions on your pages _don't_ believe that image files are sessions ids. From that page: The request URI looks like this: /cgi-bin/WebObjects/woapp.woa/wo/images/headerart.jpg. The /wo/ indicates that it is a session based, component request so WO just hands it off to the WOComponentRequestHandler. The WOComponentRequestHandler needs a session to handle the request, so it creates one if one does not exist. After that point it hits the error of the URL being nonsense. Chuck Thanks for the explanation Chuck - very much appreciated. After implementing Klaus's code, I'm now returning 404's on most of the images in my app - so they don't show up at least in development. So, this will fubar deployment. I am using Wonder/apache to rewrite urls. Do I have to get the rewriting involved in referencing my images properly now? Tim What's been causing this for me are requests for Ajax/WebServerResources/ibox/images/bg.png when using AMD. …and maybe others. Oh, and thanks to Klaus for sharing the code! Tim Worman UCLA GSEIS On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Klaus Berkling wrote: Sometime back in 2005 Kaj Hejer posted a question about having a relative link to an image, and clicking links on the wo app page resulted in their custom 'session expired' page. The solution was to catch the request for the image in dispatchRequest and return a 404. Well I recently came acros the same type of problem. I though I'd share the code: http://web.mac.com/kib/page1/files/relative_image.html If you have sessions that you can't account for, this may be why. Thanks kib The trouble with normal is it always gets worse. Bruce Cockburn Klaus Berkling Systems Administrator DynEd International, Inc. www.dyned.com | www.eskimo.com/~kiberkli -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Using AjaxInPlaceEditor in WORepetition
On 2011-08-08, at 2:58 AM, naneon.raym...@neuf.fr naneon.raym...@neuf.fr wrote: Hi Chuck, here in attached three pics. pic0 is a little table personnel which contains relationship key Project and personneUlr as iID and tempsutil I call txImplication in my code. In EOF terms we would call that a Many to Many (M2M) join table. With an extra attribute that makes things more complex, but still manageable. pic1 is pprec I call it project entity EOPprec should have a to many relationship to EOPersonnel, ==I agree with you but PowerAMC did another thing You can still put it in your model. That is what you should do. I an not sure what to call this. assigned people? ==Yes assigned people. I created my table and relation from PowerAMC. It's this software which create the sql code I used to generate my database. The eoPersonnelUlr relationship looks wrong. Or it is poorly named. Is this owner or manager? ==manager pic2 is personneUlr I call it person Entity EOPersonnelUlr should also have a to many relationship to EOPersonnel, I an not sure what to call this. projects? == yes projects Then you create a new EOPersonnel, attach it to EOPprec and EOPersonnelUlr (addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey). This object is then what gets edited in your grid, not session.getTxImplication(). Before editing the new EOPersonnel in grid. I must his data. Before saving his data I must have them. So I create variables to have data I would like to save in EOPersonnel I hope you understand me You can also create and insert the objects. If they are not used, then delete them before saving. Chuck -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Editing Context Sporadically not Reverting?
Hi Andrew, Have you gotten anywhere on this? Chuck On 2011-07-31, at 12:36 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote: Hi there; I'm still trying to track this one down; getting closer to the source of the issue, sporadically the exception below (illogically) fires; - - - - - EOEditingContext ec = myEo.editingContext(); // actually default ec String newValue = GEN RANDOM STRING; myEo.setFoo(newValue); if(ec.updatedObjects().isEmpty()) throw new IllegalStateException(...); - - - - - Has anybody got any ideas about what broadly happens between a value being set on an EO and the editing context's updated objects being populated? -- this may give me some leads. cheers. Original Message Subject: Editing Context Sporadically not Reverting? Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:20:34 +1200 From: Andrew Lindesay a...@lindesay.co.nz To: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com Hi; We're seeing a wierd one which I have not previously had come up. I have an object X living in the default EC which is modified by takeValuesFromRequest(..). In the invokeAction(..) the method revert() is invoked on the default EC. However the modifications on X survive the revert. This happens sporadically. If I look at updatedObjects() on the ec just prior to the revert, when this problem arises it seems to think it has no modified objects. I'm fairly sure that I am sticking to the editing context golden rules and are not doing anything terribly wierd. Has anybody else seen this one? cheers -- Andrew Lindesay www.silvereye.co.nz ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net This email sent to ch...@global-village.net -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Cayenne
Sigh. I can't leave well-enough alone... On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:38 AM, John Huss wrote: No, I mean the user list, like this post. :-) On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:08 PM, David Holt programming...@mac.com wrote: Interested parties would like to know what you found interesting! :-) Is this the list you're thinking of? http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cayenne-dev/201108.mbox/thread David ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
