Re: Un-Worder-ized Ajax framework
On 26.04.2007, at 10:18, Steven Mark McCraw wrote: 3) Consider using the frameworks. It's a few days of investment up front, but speaking as someone who was initially skeptical in adopting the frameworks in their entirety, I have to say, everything there seems really solid. It better be - there are "a couple" of people out there using the Wonder frameworks in more than one heavy load production app. cug ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Un-Worder-ized Ajax framework
Hi Ralph, I started out down the same path as yourself. Here is what I learned: 1) Don't try to get Wonder 3.0. You would think that this would be far more stable that the current build, but a recent build is the way to go (FAR more stable and complete than 3.0), especially with regard to AJAX stuff. 2) subclass ERXAjaxApplication instead of ERXApplication if you don't want to use other WOnder stuff 3) Consider using the frameworks. It's a few days of investment up front, but speaking as someone who was initially skeptical in adopting the frameworks in their entirety, I have to say, everything there seems really solid. I'm pretty heavily integrated now, and have no regrets about taking the plunge. Mark On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Ralph Scheuer wrote: Hello, we are currently evaluating the Ajax framework from Project WONDER. However, we do not intend to use anything else from those frameworks. Does anybody on this list have an un-WONDER-ized version of this framework or did anybody manage to get the version from WONDER 3.0 running without using ERExtensions (in particular without extending ERXSession and ERXApplication)? Thanks for any pointers. Ralph Scheuer ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mark% 40bluecollarsoftware.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Un-Worder-ized Ajax framework
You can't easily remove the ERExtensions dependency, but you should be able to just link to ERExtensions without breaking anything (and ERJars). Your app should extend ERXAjaxApplication or ERXAjaxSession which is the superclass of ERXApplication and ERXSession (it only adds ajax-specific things, and none of the other wonder-y things). If you aren't even able to that, you could always steal the code from those classes, but it's much better to extend. Don't use Ajax from the 3.0 release. That's almost a year old now. You should use a recent build from the build server (http:// webobjects.mdimension.com/wonder). Wonder tends to not have "unstable" builds (per se), so using the latest build is generally a good thing. You should also join wonder-disc, which is the better place to ask this question. ms On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Ralph Scheuer wrote: Hello, we are currently evaluating the Ajax framework from Project WONDER. However, we do not intend to use anything else from those frameworks. Does anybody on this list have an un-WONDER-ized version of this framework or did anybody manage to get the version from WONDER 3.0 running without using ERExtensions (in particular without extending ERXSession and ERXApplication)? Thanks for any pointers. Ralph Scheuer ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag% 40mdimension.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Un-Worder-ized Ajax framework
Hello, we are currently evaluating the Ajax framework from Project WONDER. However, we do not intend to use anything else from those frameworks. Does anybody on this list have an un-WONDER-ized version of this framework or did anybody manage to get the version from WONDER 3.0 running without using ERExtensions (in particular without extending ERXSession and ERXApplication)? Thanks for any pointers. Ralph Scheuer ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
