Yes, I am sorry, but this is too late for origin.
It passed IETF LC, IESG and IANA and is now in the final RFC-Editor
queue before it will be published very shortly.
Best regards, Tobias
Ps.: @Anne: not sure, but maybe alternatively worth considering adding
your idea to the framework-reqs document?
On 23/11/11 13:07, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2011-11-23 13:47, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Often it is convenient to use cross-origin in a specification rather
than non same origin. Can this term be added to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-websec-origin#section-5
That would be most useful.
Seems to be too late, it's in the publication queue:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/queue2.html#draft-ietf-websec-origin.
Best regards, Julian
___
websec mailing list
websec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
___
websec mailing list
websec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
