[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2109) beanmanager wont respect java classlaoders?

2016-02-14 Thread Tomas Remes (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Tomas Remes commented on  WELD-2109 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: beanmanager wont respect java classlaoders?  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I think we need more information about your setup. In which jar (or bean archive) do you have the code mentioned above? Is it common deployment or is it module jar? And what about the second jar? Producer would be more than helpful. Thank's 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-509) VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording

2016-02-14 Thread Tomas Remes (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Tomas Remes edited a comment on  CDITCK-509 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Wrt {{org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.extensions.lifecycle.processBeanAttributes.VerifyValuesTest}} - the test is currently ok and reflects the spec assertion. However I understand your concern. I think the case you mention is variation at problem issued by CDI-581. On the other hand I think it could make quite sense to not allow change BeanAttributes of bean which is not enabled but it's  questonable  questionable ... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-509) VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording

2016-02-14 Thread Tomas Remes (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Tomas Remes commented on  CDITCK-509 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wrt org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.extensions.lifecycle.processBeanAttributes.VerifyValuesTest - the test is currently ok and reflects the spec assertion. However I understand your concern. I think the case you mention is variation at problem issued by CDI-581. On the other hand I think it could make quite sense to not allow change BeanAttributes of bean which is not enabled but it's questonable... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-509) VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording

2016-02-14 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Mark Struberg commented on  CDITCK-509 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oh I think we missed the most obvious chicken-egg problem yet: The spec currently defines that ProcessBeanAttributes must ONLY get fired for 'enabled' beans. But if you use ProcessBeanAttributes#veto() then this bean is not enabled anymore... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues