[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2474) Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba created an issue Weld / WELD-2474 Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.0.3.Final Assignee: Matej Novotny Created: 20/Mar/18 11:48 AM Fix Versions: 3.0.4.Final Priority: Critical Reporter: Martin Kouba There are some places where it does not matter (e.g. BeanAttributesConfiguratorImpl#removeDefaultQualifierIfNeeded) but others (.e.g. org.jboss.weld.util.Observers#isContainerLifecycleObserverMethod()) may result in NoClassDefFoundError. I think we should be consistent and only use Weld literals for now. Add Comment
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2474) Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated an issue Weld / WELD-2474 Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places Change By: Martin Kouba Priority: Critical Major Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2474) Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba commented on WELD-2474 Re: Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places This particular check is only performed if an extension declares an observer method like @Observes Object event. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2474) Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places
Title: Message Title
Matej Novotny commented on WELD-2474
Re: Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places
Back there I recall I was {{grep}}ing through the code and I left some of these in place for I thought them harmless (they were in tests for the most part). But I wonder how come all the tests pass with org.jboss.weld.util.Observers#isContainerLifecycleObserverMethod()) using CDI literals? This should be used in every OM check, right?
Add Comment
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849)
___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2474) Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny updated an issue Weld / WELD-2474 Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places Change By: Matej Novotny Git Pull Request: https://github.com/weld/core/pull/1806 Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2474) Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba resolved as Done Weld / WELD-2474 Weld is still using CDI 2.0 literal implementations in several places Change By: Martin Kouba Status: Open Resolved Resolution: Done Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
