[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-11-22 Thread Matej Novotny (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matej Novotny commented on  WELD-2508  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 In the end, only TargetInstanceProxy and ProxyObject needed adjustments, rest is either part of API, hence should be easily usable, or is obscure enough as it is.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-11-22 Thread Matej Novotny (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matej Novotny updated  WELD-2508  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Weld /  WELD-2508  
 
 
  Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Matej Novotny  
 
 
Status: 
 Pull Request Sent Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Done  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-11-17 Thread Matej Novotny (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matej Novotny assigned an issue to Matej Novotny  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Weld /  WELD-2508  
 
 
  Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Matej Novotny  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Matej Novotny  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-10-03 Thread Matej Novotny (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matej Novotny updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Weld /  WELD-2508  
 
 
  Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Matej Novotny  
 
 
Fix Version/s: 
 3.1.0.Final  
 
 
Fix Version/s: 
 3.1.x  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-06-27 Thread Martin Kouba (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Martin Kouba updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Weld /  WELD-2508  
 
 
  Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Martin Kouba  
 
 
Fix Version/s: 
 3.1.x  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-06-18 Thread Matej Novotny (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matej Novotny commented on  WELD-2508  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Agreed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-06-18 Thread Martin Kouba (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Martin Kouba commented on  WELD-2508  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 

Theoretically speaking we shouldn't break anything by changing it as this is all a matter of Weld internals...
 I agree but in practice a lot of things might break . Therefore, I suggest to fix this in 3.1.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names

2018-06-18 Thread Matej Novotny (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matej Novotny created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Weld /  WELD-2508  
 
 
  Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Enhancement  
 
 
Affects Versions: 
 3.0.4.Final  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 Proxies  
 
 
Created: 
 18/Jun/18 9:19 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Optional  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Matej Novotny  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I recently ran into this SO question where user had a method with same signature as one we add on our proxies (leading to DuplicateMemberException).  This got me thinking whether we shouldn't use some more obscure method names for whatever we add on proxies. E.g. each such method having some prefix such as weld__. It's not the first time I've seen someone bump into this issue but it's still rare hence this is not really an issue but enhancement and with low priority (if it's even worth the effort). Theoretically speaking we shouldn't break anything by changing it as this is all a matter of Weld internals, but we may want to double check with at least integrators (WFLY and other servers) as they often incorrectly depend in our internals.