[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny commented on WELD-2508 Re: Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names In the end, only TargetInstanceProxy and ProxyObject needed adjustments, rest is either part of API, hence should be easily usable, or is obscure enough as it is. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny updated WELD-2508 Weld / WELD-2508 Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names Change By: Matej Novotny Status: Pull Request Sent Resolved Resolution: Done Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny assigned an issue to Matej Novotny Weld / WELD-2508 Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names Change By: Matej Novotny Assignee: Matej Novotny Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny updated an issue Weld / WELD-2508 Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names Change By: Matej Novotny Fix Version/s: 3.1.0.Final Fix Version/s: 3.1.x Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002-sha1:609a505) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated an issue Weld / WELD-2508 Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names Change By: Martin Kouba Fix Version/s: 3.1.x Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny commented on WELD-2508 Re: Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names Agreed Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba commented on WELD-2508 Re: Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names Theoretically speaking we shouldn't break anything by changing it as this is all a matter of Weld internals... I agree but in practice a lot of things might break . Therefore, I suggest to fix this in 3.1. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2508) Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny created an issue Weld / WELD-2508 Methods added in our proxies should have more complex names Issue Type: Enhancement Affects Versions: 3.0.4.Final Assignee: Unassigned Components: Proxies Created: 18/Jun/18 9:19 AM Priority: Optional Reporter: Matej Novotny I recently ran into this SO question where user had a method with same signature as one we add on our proxies (leading to DuplicateMemberException). This got me thinking whether we shouldn't use some more obscure method names for whatever we add on proxies. E.g. each such method having some prefix such as weld__. It's not the first time I've seen someone bump into this issue but it's still rare hence this is not really an issue but enhancement and with low priority (if it's even worth the effort). Theoretically speaking we shouldn't break anything by changing it as this is all a matter of Weld internals, but we may want to double check with at least integrators (WFLY and other servers) as they often incorrectly depend in our internals.