Re: GNU Wget 1.9.1

2004-05-12 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
"Lawrance, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>I am unable to get wget to work via a proxy for HTTPS sites.
>
>It does work via proxy for HTTP
>It does work with HTTPS NOT through proxy
>
>Any ideas? Should this work?

It works in the CVS version of Wget.  Please try it and see if it
works for you.



RE: wget hangs or downloads end up incomplete in Windows 2000 & X P.

2004-05-12 Thread Phillip Pi
> On Wed, 12 May 2004, Herold Heiko wrote:
>
> > > OK, I did more tests. I noticed -v is already enabled by 
> > > default since the
> > 
> > you probably have verbose=on in your wgetrc file.
> 
> Good idea. Should I delete wgetrc? I doubt that will fix my problem since 
> I tried on two different Windows machines.

FYI. I don't have wgetrc file anywhere. I only have sample.wgetrc file on
the machines I used so it sounds like verbose is enabled by default
regardless of wgetrc file.

  
> > >  5250K .. .. .. .. ..
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The timestamp was from almost an hour ago (I was in a 
> > > meeting) during the 
> > > download test. Notice it never timed out to retry or abort! Please 
> > 
> > What happens if you restart wget again with mirror-like options on the same
> > directory tree ? Does it hang again on the same file ? If yes, what if you
> 
> Which wget parameter options are they? I never noticed it hangs on the
> same file for each hang in different tests. Please remember sometimes I
> have missing files when downloads are complete. It is either hang, finish
> but incomplete, or perfect. Those are the three results I have seen from
> many tests.
> 
> 
> > try to download that file only ?
> > If not, could you for any chance run a sniffer on that machine (ethereal is
> > free) ?
> 
> I do not know how to use this network tool. If you can give me 
> instructions I can try!
> 
> 
> > It would be useful to know if really everything is freezed, or if, for
> > example, for some reason the data is just trickling down at 1byte/minute or
> > something similar (stuck in retrasmission?). 
> 
> I have no idea. Does wget have a bytes/bits per second statistics?



RE: GNU Wget 1.9.1

2004-05-12 Thread Post, Mark K
Title: Message



It's a known 
bug.  I'm waiting for a fix for it myself.
 
 
Mark 
Post
 

-Original Message-From: Lawrance, Mark 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 
2004 9:09 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: GNU Wget 
1.9.1

GNU Wget 1.9.1
The non-interactive download utility
Updated for Wget 1.9.1, May 2003
I am unable to get wget to 
work via a proxy for HTTPS sites.
 
It does work via proxy for 
HTTP
It does work with HTTPS NOT 
through proxy
 
Any ideas? Should this 
work?
 
Mark Lawrance
 
Senior Wintel ArchitectArchitecture 
and EngineeringLondon Stock ExchangeDDE: +44 (0)20 7797 
1277
Mobile: +44 (0)7971 032235[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---The 
London Stock Exchange plc will shortly be moving to: 10 Paternoster 
Square London EC4M 7LSThis will be our new registered office 
address from 17th May 2004. The move will be completed by mid June 
2004.Our telephone numbers, email and website addresses will not be 
changing. Please speak to your company contact if you have any questions 
about the 
move.---Please 
read these warnings and restrictions:This e-mail transmission is 
strictly confidential and intended solely for the ordinary user of the e-mail 
address to which it was addressed. It may contain legally privileged and/or 
CONFIDENTIAL information. The unauthorised use, disclosure, distribution 
and/or copying of this e-mail or any information it contains is prohibited and 
could, in certain circumstances, constitute a criminal offence.If you 
have received this e-mail in error or are not an intended recipient please 
inform the London Stock Exchange immediately by return e-mail or telephone 020 
7797 1000.We advise that in keeping with good computing practice the 
recipient of this e-mail should ensure that it is virus free. We do not accept 
responsibility for any virus that may be transferred by way of this e-mail. 
E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and 
unauthorised amendment, and we do not accept liability for any such corruption, 
interception or amendment or any consequences thereof. Calls to the 
London Stock Exchange may be recorded to enable the Exchange to carry out its 
regulatory responsibilities.London Stock Exchange plcOld Broad 
StreetLondon EC2N 1HPRegistered in England and Wales No 
20757


RE: wget hangs or downloads end up incomplete in Windows 2000 & X P.

2004-05-12 Thread Phillip Pi
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Herold Heiko wrote:

> > From: Phillip Pi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > OK, I did more tests. I noticed -v is already enabled by 
> > default since the
> 
> you probably have verbose=on in your wgetrc file.

Good idea. Should I delete wgetrc? I doubt that will fix my problem since 
I tried on two different Windows machines.

 
> >  5250K .. .. .. .. ..
> > 
> > 
> > The timestamp was from almost an hour ago (I was in a 
> > meeting) during the 
> > download test. Notice it never timed out to retry or abort! Please 
> 
> What happens if you restart wget again with mirror-like options on the same
> directory tree ? Does it hang again on the same file ? If yes, what if you

Which wget parameter options are they? I never noticed it hangs on the
same file for each hang in different tests. Please remember sometimes I
have missing files when downloads are complete. It is either hang, finish
but incomplete, or perfect. Those are the three results I have seen from
many tests.


> try to download that file only ?
> If not, could you for any chance run a sniffer on that machine (ethereal is
> free) ?

I do not know how to use this network tool. If you can give me 
instructions I can try!


> It would be useful to know if really everything is freezed, or if, for
> example, for some reason the data is just trickling down at 1byte/minute or
> something similar (stuck in retrasmission?). 

I have no idea. Does wget have a bytes/bits per second statistics?



RE: wget hangs or downloads end up incomplete in Windows 2000 & X P.

2004-05-12 Thread Herold Heiko
> From: Phillip Pi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> OK, I did more tests. I noticed -v is already enabled by 
> default since the

you probably have verbose=on in your wgetrc file.

>  5250K .. .. .. .. ..
> 
> 
> The timestamp was from almost an hour ago (I was in a 
> meeting) during the 
> download test. Notice it never timed out to retry or abort! Please 

What happens if you restart wget again with mirror-like options on the same
directory tree ? Does it hang again on the same file ? If yes, what if you
try to download that file only ?
If not, could you for any chance run a sniffer on that machine (ethereal is
free) ?
It would be useful to know if really everything is freezed, or if, for
example, for some reason the data is just trickling down at 1byte/minute or
something similar (stuck in retrasmission?). 

Heiko Herold

-- 
-- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it
-- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- +39-041-5907073 ph
-- +39-041-5907472 fax


GNU Wget 1.9.1

2004-05-12 Thread Lawrance, Mark
Title: Message




GNU Wget 1.9.1
The non-interactive download utility
Updated for Wget 1.9.1, May 2003
I am unable to get wget to 
work via a proxy for HTTPS sites.
 
It does work via proxy for 
HTTP
It does work with HTTPS NOT 
through proxy
 
Any ideas? Should this 
work?
 
Mark Lawrance
 
Senior Wintel ArchitectArchitecture 
and EngineeringLondon Stock ExchangeDDE: +44 (0)20 7797 
1277
Mobile: +44 (0)7971 032235[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

---

The London Stock Exchange plc will shortly be moving to: 

10 Paternoster Square 
London 
EC4M 7LS

This will be our new registered office address from 17th May 2004. 
 
The move will be completed by mid June 2004.

Our telephone numbers, email and website addresses will not be changing. 

Please speak to your company contact if you have any questions about the move.

---

Please read these warnings and restrictions:

This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed. It may contain legally privileged and/or CONFIDENTIAL information. 

The unauthorised use, disclosure, distribution and/or copying of this e-mail or any information it contains is prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, constitute a criminal offence.

If you have received this e-mail in error or are not an intended recipient please inform the London Stock Exchange immediately by return e-mail or telephone 020 7797 1000.

We advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient of this e-mail should ensure that it is virus free. We do not accept responsibility for any virus that may be transferred by way of this e-mail. 

E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment, and we do not accept liability for any such corruption, interception or amendment or any consequences thereof. 

Calls to the London Stock Exchange may be recorded to enable the Exchange to carry out its regulatory responsibilities.

London Stock Exchange plc
Old Broad Street
London EC2N 1HP
Registered in England and Wales No 20757




Re: I love you!

2004-05-12 Thread L-Soft list server at Microsoft (1.8e)
> lovely, :-)
Unknown command - "LOVELY,". Try HELP.

Summary of resource utilization
---
 CPU time:0.000 secDevice I/O:4
 Overhead CPU:0.000 secPaging I/O:0
 CPU model: 933MHz Pentium III 256k (1152M)
 Job origin:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]