Re: [whatwg] 'Applicable Specifications'' Relevance Authors

2012-06-11 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Smylers wrote:
>
> The definition of an 'applicable specification' is marked as only having 
> relevance for implementations: 
> http://www.whatwg.org/html#other-applicable-specifications
> 
> I think that the paragraph which defines an applicable specification and 
> the note that follows it are relevant to authors, too -- in particular 
> authors wondering if they can extend HTML.
> 
> Currently 'HTML5 for Web Developers' has a link 'other applicable 
> specifications' which doesn't go anywhere: 
> http://developers.whatwg.org/elements.html

I have changed the internal labeling accordingly. Let me know if you want 
even more of that section exposed to the author version.

-- 
Ian Hickson   U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/   U+263A/,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'


[whatwg] 'Applicable Specifications'' Relevance Authors

2012-04-11 Thread Smylers
The definition of an 'applicable specification' is marked as only having
relevance for implementations:
http://www.whatwg.org/html#other-applicable-specifications

I think that the paragraph which defines an applicable specification and
the note that follows it are relevant to authors, too -- in particular
authors wondering if they can extend HTML.

Currently 'HTML5 for Web Developers' has a link 'other applicable
specifications' which doesn't go anywhere:
http://developers.whatwg.org/elements.html

Cheers

Smylers