Re: [whatwg] Interface object vs constructor in Web Workers

[Ian Hickson]

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Simon Pieters wrote:

 http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/#interface-objects-and-constructors
  
 seems to say that there must be no interface object for Worker and 
 SharedWorker, but the constructors are to be available, which doesn't 
 make any sense since the constructor and the interface object are in 
 fact the same object, unless I'm misunderstanding things.

Fixed.

-- 
Ian Hickson   U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/   U+263A/,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Re: [whatwg] Interface object vs constructor in Web Workers

[Simon Pieters]

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:47:10 +0200, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/#interface-objects-and-constructors  
seems to say that there must be no interface object for Worker and  
SharedWorker, but the constructors are to be available, which doesn't  
make any sense since the constructor and the interface object are in  
fact the same object, unless I'm misunderstanding things.


Also, it should probably say Worker and SharedWorker instead of  
Worker() and SharedWorker(url).


--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

[whatwg] Interface object vs constructor in Web Workers

[Simon Pieters]

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/#interface-objects-and-constructors  
seems to say that there must be no interface object for Worker and  
SharedWorker, but the constructors are to be available, which doesn't make  
any sense since the constructor and the interface object are in fact the  
same object, unless I'm misunderstanding things.


--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software