On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Simon Pieters wrote:
The Interface objects and constructors section says
There must be no interface objects and constructors available in the
global scope of scripts whose script's global object is a
WorkerGlobalScope object except for the following:
WorkerGlobalScope, WorkerLocation, Navigator, AbstractWorker, ErrorEvent
are not in the list. Is this intentional? If they're intended to not
create interface objects, it would be clearer if the IDLs had
[NoInterfaceObject].
I've changed that section to be more precise legalese that automatically
does the right thing.
Should EventTarget and Event be in the list?
These are now automatically covered by the new magical text in the
aforementioned section. (Basically I said that any interfaces relevant to
exposed APIs are automatically to be available.)
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
