Re: [whatwg] Proposal Update

[Domenic Denicola]

From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Jacob 
Villarreal

> I finally got my proposal straightened out.  It's as simple as follows:

Hi Jacob,

I would respectfully ask that you stop using this list for your proposal. So 
far you have created four separate threads and still not been able to engage us 
according to the use-cases first working mode that is necessary for adding new 
features to HTML. As such it's more appropriate for you to take this elsewhere. 
I'd suggest creating a personal web page or GitHub repository where you work on 
your proposal together with any other interested parties. Please do not create 
any more threads on this mailing list.

Thanks, and I hope you can understand.

-Domenic

[whatwg] Proposal Update

[Jacob Villarreal]

I finally got my proposal straightened out.  It's as simple as follows:
Content Markup Language (CML)
Port Tag:Syntax:  (+)
Source Tag:Syntax:  (+)
Destination Tag:Syntax:  
CSS Tag:Syntax:  /
Appendation Operator:Syntax: +  (placed at the end of either , or 
)
CSS is accomplished by appending singular/multiple sources to a singular 
destination record for retrieval, and appliance of style attributes to page 
objects as in the following code:

**CSS Batch**+++
**CSS Attribution**
CSS batch sources must be grouped in the preferred sequential order.  The  
tag encapsulates the source batch for css attribution on the sources in 
sequential order.
The  tag enables portability with real-time data ports, 
encryption/decryption, and porting to window popups, window tabs, and viewport.
The internal '+' tag operator enables line parsing within html records, for 
execution of specific html lines of source code.
I think CML will eventually phase out html all together.  What do you think?
Jacob