Re: [whatwg] Time and Date (was: Joe Clark's Criticisms of the WHATWG and HTML 5)
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Colin Lieberman wrote: > Matthew Raymond wrote: > > > > I support the element for the opposite reason, in fact. I don't > > want to see authors styling the date format. I'd rather see the date > > format localized or customized to a user preference. If the author > > wants it in a specific format, they can use CSS to style the element > > in such a way as to show its contents: > > > > HTML: > > | (*)???;YY;D???(*) > > > > CSS (using css3-content): > > | time { content: contents; } > > I agree to a point. Time and date should be machine readable in markup, > but I don't know if UAs should *default* to user preference over-riding > the author's chosen format. > > My argument here is cultural or sociological - If, in 10 years, kids > grew up only ever seeing dates presented in one format, they wouldn't > learn about how dates work elsewhere. This seems like a small thing, but > I think the flavor of dealing with varieties of date formats is just one > way that we get to participate in a really cool, big world full of lots > of different people. I think it is highly unlikely that would be so successful as to hide all other date formats from users. Would we only be so lucky! -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
[whatwg] Time and Date (was: Joe Clark's Criticisms of the WHATWG and HTML 5)
Matthew Raymond wrote: I support the element for the opposite reason, in fact. I don't want to see authors styling the date format. I'd rather see the date format localized or customized to a user preference. If the author wants it in a specific format, they can use CSS to style the element in such a way as to show its contents: HTML: | (*)???;YY;D???(*) CSS (using css3-content): | time { content: contents; } I agree to a point. Time and date should be machine readable in markup, but I don't know if UAs should *default* to user preference over-riding the author's chosen format. My argument here is cultural or sociological - If, in 10 years, kids grew up only ever seeing dates presented in one format, they wouldn't learn about how dates work elsewhere. This seems like a small thing, but I think the flavor of dealing with varieties of date formats is just one way that we get to participate in a really cool, big world full of lots of different people. Yes - dates should be standardized for machines. This allows AT to help folks with (for example) learning disabilities. No - people should not only be served one flavor of date format unless they need it. Just my two cents, Colin Lieberman