Re: Almost 100,000 downloads for Wicket!
congratulations! On 12/2/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And that is only counting the sourceforge downloads. http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=119783ugn=wickettype=prdownloadmode=alltimepackage_id=0 Martijn -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a
Re: ListView in a form sucks
* Eelco Hillenius: Well, no. We'd have to start a new vote. Which I'm not gonna do this time, as my previous two tries got a very luke-warm response :) No Wicket developer seems to be willing to undertake this. So, shall I start the vote? -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Unit tests, license headers
The unittests discovered that we don't have the correct license header for the newest addition to our core project in wicket-1.x branch: WildcardMatcherHelper.java 2 points: 1. I thought we had our default new file template in place, why doesn't it work? 2. Unit tests are to be run. If a test fails, at least check if it is caused by your change wicket-1.x/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/application/WildcardMatcherHelper.java Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Download Wicket 1.2.3 at http://wicketframework.org
Re: ListView in a form sucks
Sure, go for it. Eelco On 12/4/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Eelco Hillenius: Well, no. We'd have to start a new vote. Which I'm not gonna do this time, as my previous two tries got a very luke-warm response :) No Wicket developer seems to be willing to undertake this. So, shall I start the vote? -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
[VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
See thread [1]« ListView in a form sucks » for background information on this. As stated by Eelco, the idea is: « to move at least a bunch of [2]repeaters to the core project and give them more visibility by replacing a couple of the list view based examples we have now with repeaters. » Some citations: « It is very easy to miss those great extensions, just because they are not in core. » « ListView is fragile » « Regardless of the problems people have with list views - most think the repeaters work better anyway. » So please cast your votes: [ ] Leave ListView in core unchanged and let the repeaters forever in the extensions [ ] Move at least a bunch of repeaters from wicket-extensions into core and deprecate ListView -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ [1] http://www.nabble.com/ListView-in-a-%3Cform%3E-sucks-tf2717109.html#a7575558 [2] http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/wicket/extensions/markup/html/repeater/RepeatingView.html
Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
Here's my non-binding +1: [ ] Leave ListView in core unchanged and let the repeaters forever in the extensions [X] Move at least a bunch of repeaters from wicket-extensions into core and deprecate ListView -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
So please cast your votes: [ ] Leave ListView in core unchanged and let the repeaters forever in the extensions [ x ] Move at least a bunch of repeaters from wicket-extensions into core and deprecate ListView Eelco (binding) Though we don't have to actually deprecate ListView. I think just a couple of @see tags and some explanation that you might prefer a repeater when working with database would be enough imo.
Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: See thread [1]« ListView in a form sucks » for background information on this. As stated by Eelco, the idea is: « to move at least a bunch of [2]repeaters to the core project and give them more visibility by replacing a couple of the list view based examples we have now with repeaters. » Some citations: « It is very easy to miss those great extensions, just because they are not in core. » « ListView is fragile » « Regardless of the problems people have with list views - most think the repeaters work better anyway. » So please cast your votes: [ ] Leave ListView in core unchanged and let the repeaters forever in the extensions [X] Move at least a bunch of repeaters from wicket-extensions into core and deprecate ListView -Matej (binding)
Re: Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
I don't like to deprecate listview. It has enough good usecases to keep it and promote its use. And furthermore, I would like to know *which* repeaters move to core... Therefore: -1 for the proposal (either outcome) Martijn On 12/4/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So please cast your votes: [ ] Leave ListView in core unchanged and let the repeaters forever in the extensions [ x ] Move at least a bunch of repeaters from wicket-extensions into core and deprecate ListView Eelco (binding) Though we don't have to actually deprecate ListView. I think just a couple of @see tags and some explanation that you might prefer a repeater when working with database would be enough imo. -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket;Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a
Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
Well, just to specify my vote closely, I'm for adding DataView and all it's superclasses (RefreshingView, ...) in the core. And I'm against making ListView deprecated. -Matej Matej Knopp wrote: Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: See thread [1]« ListView in a form sucks » for background information on this. As stated by Eelco, the idea is: « to move at least a bunch of [2]repeaters to the core project and give them more visibility by replacing a couple of the list view based examples we have now with repeaters. » Some citations: « It is very easy to miss those great extensions, just because they are not in core. » « ListView is fragile » « Regardless of the problems people have with list views - most think the repeaters work better anyway. » So please cast your votes: [ ] Leave ListView in core unchanged and let the repeaters forever in the extensions [X] Move at least a bunch of repeaters from wicket-extensions into core and deprecate ListView -Matej (binding)
Re: Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
I would like to know *which* repeaters move to core... That could be another proposal for which we need some to time to settle which ones. The point of this vote is to get clear whether we want to keep the things as they are, or that we want to put some more weight on the repeaters instead of listview. Eelco
Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
[ ] Leave ListView in core unchanged and let the repeaters forever in the extensions [X] Move at least a bunch of repeaters from wicket-extensions into core (and deprecate ListView) == skip that -igor
Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
Martijn Dashorst wrote: I don't like to deprecate listview. It has enough good usecases to keep it and promote its use. And furthermore, I would like to know *which* repeaters move to core... Therefore: -1 for the proposal (either outcome) Is this a formal veto for the whole thing, or would you accept it if we move some repeaters to core and don't deprecate ListView? Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
Re: Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
see the new thread. it is pretty specific. -igor On 12/4/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/4/06, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martijn Dashorst wrote: I don't like to deprecate listview. It has enough good usecases to keep it and promote its use. And furthermore, I would like to know *which* repeaters move to core... Therefore: -1 for the proposal (either outcome) Is this a formal veto for the whole thing, or would you accept it if we move some repeaters to core and don't deprecate ListView? As the proposal currently stands it is a veto. If the proposal is amended/changed, I will change my vote. The current proposal just doesn't leave much room for the middle way. In this particular case, I found the premise bad: ListView does not suck, and should remain in core. I really don't like votes where halfway through the voting subjects change. This is a horrible precedent, and clouds the meaning of earlier votes. On the other hand, starting 5 vote threads to get one thing fixed is also not helpful and just as bad. Martijn -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a
Re: [VOTE] [EDITED] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
+1 Eelco On 12/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -igor On 12/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: move DataView and all super+support classes into core alongside ListView amend ListView's javadoc to refer users to the newly added repeaters that might better fit the usecase -igor
Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
On 12/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: see the new thread. it is pretty specific. Done, however, I would like it better if the original poster would have done so. It is his proposal. Martijn
Re: Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
On 12/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then you shouldve stated so! :) He's backk! :D Martijn -igor On 12/4/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: see the new thread. it is pretty specific. Done, however, I would like it better if the original poster would have done so. It is his proposal. Martijn -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket;Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a
Re: [VOTE] [EDITED] Moving the wicket-extension's repeater package to core
+1 Juergen Igor Vaynberg wrote: move DataView and all super+support classes into core alongside ListView amend ListView's javadoc to refer users to the newly added repeaters that might better fit the usecase -igor
