Re: Resource loading
Simplifying sounds *very* good to me. Thanks for giving it a try. Eelco On 1/7/07, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In an attempt to simplify (more readable) resource loading I - renamed IResourceStreamLocator to IResourceStreamFactory - combined what used to be AbstractResourceStreamLocator, ClassResourceStreamLocator, ResourceFinderResourceStreamLocator and CompoundResourceStreamLocator in a single class ResourceStreamFactory. Everything that used to be possible should be possible but slightly different. Instead implementing a IResourceStreamLocator and adding it to ComponentResouceStreamLocator you now must subclass ResourceStreamFactory and replace the appropriate ResourceStreamFactory method. There are only few, so don't worry. This is meant to be the first step to make properties searching more readable/simply as well. WDYT? Juergen
Re: Resource loading
yes, sounds cleaner -igor On 1/7/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simplifying sounds *very* good to me. Thanks for giving it a try. Eelco On 1/7/07, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In an attempt to simplify (more readable) resource loading I - renamed IResourceStreamLocator to IResourceStreamFactory - combined what used to be AbstractResourceStreamLocator, ClassResourceStreamLocator, ResourceFinderResourceStreamLocator and CompoundResourceStreamLocator in a single class ResourceStreamFactory. Everything that used to be possible should be possible but slightly different. Instead implementing a IResourceStreamLocator and adding it to ComponentResouceStreamLocator you now must subclass ResourceStreamFactory and replace the appropriate ResourceStreamFactory method. There are only few, so don't worry. This is meant to be the first step to make properties searching more readable/simply as well. WDYT? Juergen
hangman exception: attach
Hangman doesnt work anymore WicketMessage: Error attaching this container for rendering: [MarkupContainer [Component id = 0, page = wicket.examples.hangman.Guess, path = 1:letters:0.ListItem, isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]] Root cause: java.lang.IllegalStateException: wicket.Component has not been properly attached. Something in the hierarchy of wicket.examples.hangman.Guess$2$1 has not called super.onAtach() in the override of onAttach() method at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2799) at wicket.MarkupContainer.attachChildren(MarkupContainer.java:372) at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2807) at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.onGenerateItems(ListView.java:614) at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.onAttach(ListView.java:548) at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2796) at wicket.MarkupContainer.attachChildren(MarkupContainer.java:372) at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2807) at wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:1082) at wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycle.redirectTo(WebRequestCycle.java:171) at wicket.request.target.component.PageRequestTarget.respond(PageRequestTarget.java:61) at wicket.request.compound.DefaultResponseStrategy.respond(DefaultResponseStrategy.java:53) at wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.respond(AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:65) at wicket.RequestCycle.doProcessEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:944) at wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:973) at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1054) at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1125) at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:470) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:232) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:122) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1041) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:354) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:226) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:627) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:141) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:269) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:430) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:687) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:492) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:199) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:339) at org.mortbay.jetty.nio.HttpChannelEndPoint.run(HttpChannelEndPoint.java:270) at org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:475) Complete stack:
junit error due to radiobox changes
There are junit test failure dues to changes to RadioBoxes? Juergen
Re: hangman exception: attach
fixed -igor On 1/7/07, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hangman doesnt work anymore WicketMessage: Error attaching this container for rendering: [MarkupContainer [Component id = 0, page = wicket.examples.hangman.Guess, path = 1:letters:0.ListItem, isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]] Root cause: java.lang.IllegalStateException: wicket.Component has not been properly attached. Something in the hierarchy of wicket.examples.hangman.Guess$2$1 has not called super.onAtach() in the override of onAttach() method at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2799) at wicket.MarkupContainer.attachChildren(MarkupContainer.java:372) at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2807) at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.onGenerateItems(ListView.java:614) at wicket.markup.html.list.ListView.onAttach(ListView.java:548) at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2796) at wicket.MarkupContainer.attachChildren(MarkupContainer.java:372) at wicket.Component.attach(Component.java:2807) at wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:1082) at wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycle.redirectTo(WebRequestCycle.java :171) at wicket.request.target.component.PageRequestTarget.respond( PageRequestTarget.java:61) at wicket.request.compound.DefaultResponseStrategy.respond( DefaultResponseStrategy.java:53) at wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.respond( AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:65) at wicket.RequestCycle.doProcessEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:944) at wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:973) at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1054) at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1125) at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:470) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:232) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:122) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter( ServletHandler.java:1041) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java :354) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java :226) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java :627) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java :141) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:269) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:430) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete( HttpConnection.java:687) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:492) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:199) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:339) at org.mortbay.jetty.nio.HttpChannelEndPoint.run(HttpChannelEndPoint.java :270) at org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run( BoundedThreadPool.java:475) Complete stack:
Re: junit error due to radiobox changes
doh, fixed :) i made a trivial change and didnt bother to run the tests, shame on me. -igor On 1/7/07, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are junit test failure dues to changes to RadioBoxes? Juergen
