Re: proposal for feedback messages refactor
Dutch saying, "from uitstel komt afstel" from? let me check the dutch dictionary..
Re: [wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?
Hi Bart Actually WCD was jdk1.4 compliant but a recent issue has been open (http://81.17.46.170:8090/jira/browse/DOJO-27) to move to 1.4. But you are right. We also need to move example from 1.4 to 1.5. I will update pom.xml file. Cheers -- Vincent Bart Molenkamp a écrit : Hi, I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override annotations in the sample code, which doesn't work with JDK 1.4. So, should it use 1.4 (and thus remove the annotations) or use 1.5 (update pom.xml)?? Thanks, Bart.
[wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?
Hi, I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override annotations in the sample code, which doesn't work with JDK 1.4. So, should it use 1.4 (and thus remove the annotations) or use 1.5 (update pom.xml)?? Thanks, Bart.
Re: Incubator release and what now?
On 4/2/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would have put the release stuff in the 1.x branch in the first place. Now that it ended up there, the sooner it comes back to 1.x the better. No, because you don't want to build a release against a moving target, which the 1.x branch clearly is. The decision was made conciously to fork the release, get that stable and then push the results to the 1.x branch. We explicitly decided to split the effort of backporting stuff from trunk and the effort of graduation. Martijn -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: Incubator release and what now?
* Martijn Dashorst: > We have some feedback on the release and should work on resolving > that. There are several avenues we can walk to fix it. > > - fix the release branch and re-issue that (requires some backporting > of threadtest iirc) > - port the release stuff to the 1.x branch, and cut a new release > > I think I prefer fixing the release branch, get it vetted and then > backport the release stuff to branch 1.x. This is the shortest way to > getting ratified IMO. Hi Martijn, I would have put the release stuff in the 1.x branch in the first place. Now that it ended up there, the sooner it comes back to 1.x the better. For those who wonder what feedback we are talking about, this is on the incubator-general mailing-list: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Ratify-the-release-of-Apache-Wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha-tf3491229.html -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
