Re: [wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

2007-04-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Vincent Demay:

> Actually WCD  was jdk1.4 compliant  but a recent issue  has been
> open  (http://81.17.46.170:8090/jira/browse/DOJO-27) to  move to
> 1.4.
  

To 1.5 you mean!
-- 
 Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka  John Banana   Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/


Re: [wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

2007-04-02 Thread Vincent Demay

Hi Bart

Actually WCD was jdk1.4 compliant but a recent issue has been open 
(http://81.17.46.170:8090/jira/browse/DOJO-27) to move to 1.4. But you 
are right. We also need to move example from 1.4 to 1.5. I will update 
pom.xml file.


Cheers
--
Vincent


Bart Molenkamp a écrit :

Hi,

I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum
JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that
wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples
requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override
annotations in the sample code, which doesn't work with JDK 1.4.

So, should it use 1.4 (and thus remove the annotations) or use 1.5
(update pom.xml)??

Thanks,
Bart.

  




[wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

2007-04-02 Thread Bart Molenkamp
Hi,

I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum
JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that
wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples
requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override
annotations in the sample code, which doesn't work with JDK 1.4.

So, should it use 1.4 (and thus remove the annotations) or use 1.5
(update pom.xml)??

Thanks,
Bart.